For the believer, sin comes from our flesh (sarks). The flesh of the believer is still in a process of change and progress to made into the image of God.
If John had meant in I John 1:8 that the believer still has the sin nature, that is what he would have said. He had the Greek vocabulary available to say that. He could have said - "if we say that we do not have a sin nature (or old man, or old nature)", but instead he wrote, "If we say that we have no sin . . ."
You can't just take the word "sin" and translate it as "sin nature".
Does all sin originate from the sin nature? Adam did not have a sin nature and he sinned. Lucipher did not have a "sin nature" and he sinned. So to ask a rhetorical question "Is it not true that sin must originate from the sin nature?" just muddies the waters of understanding.
Here is how I see it. When a person becomes converted, his old nature (sin nature) died with Christ, and a new nature (new man) is resurrected with Christ. This very "literally" is a new birth. The believer then does not have the old sin nature, but a new nature (new man). This is all at the deep level of the spirit where the Holy Spirit indwells the believer.
[SUP]6 [/SUP]knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him, that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves of sin. [SUP]7 [/SUP]For he who has died has been freed from sin. [SUP]8 [/SUP]Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him, Romans 6:6-8
But the believer does still have the flesh: and Paul writes a lot about the ongoing battle of the believer between the flesh and the spirit. And yes, our flesh does still have leftover remnants of "sin" from when we were unbelievers: that is we still may have fears, pride, envy, selfishness, lust, etc. that we need to overcome. These were strongholds or tendencies that we may have developed when we were unbelievers and still had the old nature (sin nature).
If John had meant in I John 1:8 that the believer still has the sin nature, that is what he would have said. He had the Greek vocabulary available to say that. He could have said - "if we say that we do not have a sin nature (or old man, or old nature)", but instead he wrote, "If we say that we have no sin . . ."
You can't just take the word "sin" and translate it as "sin nature".
Does all sin originate from the sin nature? Adam did not have a sin nature and he sinned. Lucipher did not have a "sin nature" and he sinned. So to ask a rhetorical question "Is it not true that sin must originate from the sin nature?" just muddies the waters of understanding.
Here is how I see it. When a person becomes converted, his old nature (sin nature) died with Christ, and a new nature (new man) is resurrected with Christ. This very "literally" is a new birth. The believer then does not have the old sin nature, but a new nature (new man). This is all at the deep level of the spirit where the Holy Spirit indwells the believer.
[SUP]6 [/SUP]knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him, that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves of sin. [SUP]7 [/SUP]For he who has died has been freed from sin. [SUP]8 [/SUP]Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him, Romans 6:6-8
But the believer does still have the flesh: and Paul writes a lot about the ongoing battle of the believer between the flesh and the spirit. And yes, our flesh does still have leftover remnants of "sin" from when we were unbelievers: that is we still may have fears, pride, envy, selfishness, lust, etc. that we need to overcome. These were strongholds or tendencies that we may have developed when we were unbelievers and still had the old nature (sin nature).
Chester, I am addressing your first paragraph here. I don't think the flesh is being changed into the image of God. That is if by flesh you mean our selfish self, our self that seeks its own pleasures and comforts.
I think that is the part being crucified by the Spirit. I agree this happens through our mind and it being renewed. Scripture seems to connect the mind and the heart - as a man thinks in his heart, so is he. It's an odd concept, but there it is.
As far as if you mean our actual body, the temporary tent, it must also be destroyed because corruption cannot share with incorruption. But we know we will receive a new body just as we have received a new Spirit.