Your ignorance of astronomy, math, and physics does not equate to NASA is lying. What it does reveal is that you're exhibiting a great deal of ignorance, denial of the truth, and possibly delusional thinking - or alternatively simply trolling - to the extent that you will not accept empirical truth that refutes your false premise (e.g. we are all in the center of the earth) even when it is explained and demonstrated to you with empirical evidence. This behavior eventually gets tagged as disruptive.
The behavior violates rule #2 which states:
"We like to welcome all to Christian Chat, but if anyone is not here for fellowship (or for wanting to know about Christianity), but simply for disrupting fellowship, offending people, whatever, then that person is not welcome."
Creating threads with blatantly false premises and then ranting nonsensically to defend them when educated people correct you with scholarly empirical evidence is disruptive to our Christian fellowship.
I'm just letting you know in advance because your stay here might be shortened if you continue to act in this manner.
The influence of light on
astrophotography has already been explained to you in the simplest of terms. The reason why those stars and planets appear small in that photograph has to do with distance. Saturn is 1.2 billion km, roughly 7 AU, from the Earth when the two are at their closest approach to one another. They are 1.67 billion km, around 11 AU, from each other when they are at their most distant.
Perspective, in context vision and visual perception, is the way in which objects appear to the eye based on their spatial attributes, dimensions, and the position of the eye relative to the objects.
As objects become more distant they appear smaller because their
visual angle decreases. The visual angle of an object is the angle subtended at the eye by a triangle with the object at its base. The greater the distance of the object from the eye, the greater is the height of this triangle, and the less the visual angle. See: Burton, H. E. (1945). The optics of Euclid. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 35, 357-372.
An example would be viewing the sun and the moon from a position on earth. They appear to be roughly the same size because the sun, although much larger, is also much farther away. The relationship between distance and apparent height of objects is an inverse-linear function:
where h is the apparent height, d is the distance of the object, and a is the actual size of the object. So if you want to find the true height of an object in the distance, multiply the apparent height with the distance the object is from you.
You may use an angular calculator to find the real size of distant objects if you have some basic information regarding them.
Now this can be demonstrated right here on planet earth by simply taking a large helium filled balloon, first holding it up to your face, and then letting it float away. As the distance between the observer and the balloon increases, the size of the balloon appears to decrease to the observer. Where before it was very large when held directly up to the face, it is eventually a small point in the distant sky as it floats far away from the observer. If you put up a road sign and walk away from it, you will observe the same thing.
This is scientific law, not hypothesis or theory.
That dot is a mosquito on the screen. Such statement is as valid and statement of always lying NASA...
