The cerimonial laws which were shadows and types were nailed to the cross. But the moral law did not change.
Jesus did not die to remove the moral law.
The standard of right and wrong has not changed. Jesus died to forgive us not to remove the law.
Hopefully this is what you said above.
If you do not establish that your concept of the ceremonial law contains an identical list of laws as Paul's concept of the ceremonial law, then you are misunderstanding him by interpreting him as referring to the ceremonial law, however, the Paul never lists which laws are part of the ceremonial law and never even refers to that as being a category of law. If a group of people were to create lists of which laws they considered to be part of the ceremonial law, then they would have a wide variety of lists and none of those people should interpret Paul as referring to a list that they just created. If I categorized God's laws based upon which part of the body is most commonly used to obey/disobey them, such as with the law against theft being a hand law, then interpreted Paul was referring to a category that I had just created without establishing that he categorized God's law in the same manner, such as interpreting Colossians 2:14 as nailing hand laws to the cross, then I would be making the same sort of error that you are making.
Jesus gave himself to pay the penalty for our sins, so what was nailed to his cross was not any of God's laws, but the list of the sin that we have committed. For example:
1.) You shall not commit murder.
2.) This person has been found guilty of murder.
The first is an example of a law that is for our own good while the second is an example of a handwritten ordinance that was was against someone that was nailed to their cross in order to announce why they were being executed, which was instead nailed to Christ's cross.
The existence of the category of moral law would imply that we can be acting morally while disobeying the laws that are not in that category, however, there is no example in the Bible where someone's disobedience to God is stated to be moral. Morality is in regard to what we ought to do and we ought to obey God, so all of God's laws are inherently moral laws. Legislators give laws according to what they think ought to be done, so for you to suggest that some of God's laws are not moral laws is to suggest that God made a moral error about what ought to be done when He gave those laws and is therefore to claim to have greater moral knowledge than God.