.
● Matt 2:11-12 . .Then they opened their treasures and presented him with
gifts of gold and of incense and of myrrh.
Those were not only appropriate tributes in that day, but also valuable
commodities that Joseph could put to use in financing his family's pending
sojourn in Egypt. (Matt 2:13-14)
It would've been fun if Matthew had told us the weight of the gold so we
could put a dollar figure on it according to today's precious metals.
● Matt 2:11-12 . . And having been warned in a dream not to go back to
Herod, they returned to their country by another route.
That was a safety measure to prevent Herod from knowing where to find the
lad because rulers in that day were typically Machiavellian-- they didn't just
crush potential threats to their power; they utterly annihilated it; and as
subsequent events demonstrate, ol' Herod had neither conscience nor
concern for child welfare.
● Matt 2:16a . .Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise
men, was exceeding wroth
There's really nothing in the story to even remotely suggest that the wise
men had made a fool out of Herod. It was all in his own mind, i.e. his own
perception of the events. In other words; Herod was under the impression
that they had mocked him; thus his reaction was stimulated by a false
premise.
● Matt 2:16b . . He sent forth, and slew all the children that were in
Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under,
according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men.
The Greek word for "coasts" is a mite ambiguous. It technically indicates
borders, but can also indicate regions.
That verse is commonly appropriated to calculate Jesus' age relative to when
the wise men visited him and his mother. But the verse merely indicates the
passage of time since Herod interviewed the men; which is quite useless for
calculating Jesus' age seeing as how he was already born before the men
even left their country-- how long before they left their country, nobody
knows for sure.
● Matt 2:17-18 . .Then what was said through the prophet Jeremiah was
fulfilled: "A voice is heard in Ramah, weeping and great mourning, Rachel
weeping for her children and refusing to be comforted, because they are no
more." (Jer 31:15)
Ramah was roughly six miles north of Jerusalem, while Bethlehem is roughly
the same distance south in the opposite direction.
Ramah was settled by the people of Rachel's biological son Benjamin, so that
any weeping done by the mothers in that area would be reckoned, by heritage,
to be Rachel's weeping.
What this suggests to me is that the slaughter of the innocents extended
beyond the community of Bethlehem. Were we to set a draftsman's compass
to a radius equal to the distance between Bethlehem and Ramah, and scribe
a circle with Bethlehem at the center, it would yield a pretty good idea of the
area covered by Herod's death squads.
But Herod's efforts were futile. Jesus wasn't even in the country; Joseph had
moved the child and his mother down into Egypt before all the killing
began. (Matt 2:13)
_