1
You're missing the point of this post if you think this is about worship styles. Please read first. Thanks.
I was listening to Issues Etc.. They were discussing Luther and worship. Something they said made me think.
Is there anything dangerous about not using a hymnal anymore?
Churches used to sing out of hymnals during worship.
Hymnals were compiled by learned people who knew their doctrine, and Bible.
The chances of something crazy getting in was probably low.
This meant Christians sang substantive Bible based songs every Sunday.(Not saying there may not have been a blemish here or there.)
But now days churches don't use the hymnal.
Rather they're almost left to the whims of what Christian radio deems as good worship.
I mean many churches sing the newer stuff.
The newer stuff really isn't run through the rigors of scrutiny like the old hymnals.
If popular Christianity and Christian radio views a song as "good", then it probably has a good chance of being sang in our churches.
But the standard for "good" may be more about popularity, than it is about right/wrong/correct/Biblical.
I'm not saying everything in hymnals was perfect.
But at least it went through stronger scrutiny than today's popular worship songs that simply have to pass through the rigors of human favor and popularity.
So is there a danger to leaving the majority of our worship to the whims of what is deemed as popular and good by modern Christian radio?
What happens if Christians get a life time diet of worship from songs that haven't been rigorously tested and tried like the hymns used to be tested? Do we leave ourselves open to some severe error?
I was listening to Issues Etc.. They were discussing Luther and worship. Something they said made me think.
Is there anything dangerous about not using a hymnal anymore?
Churches used to sing out of hymnals during worship.
Hymnals were compiled by learned people who knew their doctrine, and Bible.
The chances of something crazy getting in was probably low.
This meant Christians sang substantive Bible based songs every Sunday.(Not saying there may not have been a blemish here or there.)
But now days churches don't use the hymnal.
Rather they're almost left to the whims of what Christian radio deems as good worship.
I mean many churches sing the newer stuff.
The newer stuff really isn't run through the rigors of scrutiny like the old hymnals.
If popular Christianity and Christian radio views a song as "good", then it probably has a good chance of being sang in our churches.
But the standard for "good" may be more about popularity, than it is about right/wrong/correct/Biblical.
I'm not saying everything in hymnals was perfect.
But at least it went through stronger scrutiny than today's popular worship songs that simply have to pass through the rigors of human favor and popularity.
So is there a danger to leaving the majority of our worship to the whims of what is deemed as popular and good by modern Christian radio?
What happens if Christians get a life time diet of worship from songs that haven't been rigorously tested and tried like the hymns used to be tested? Do we leave ourselves open to some severe error?
Last edited: