The doctrine I don't want to believe-eternal fire

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
May 2, 2014
1,060
12
0
Luk 8:55 And her spirit came again, and she arose straightway: and he commanded to give her meat.

This is only an example in your mind because of your preconceived Idea of what the Spirit is.

Its your view of what spirit means that is platonic philosophy.

This is the same spirit that goes to God when we die,

Ecc 12:7 Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.

Spirit means: breath, air etc.

where did God give it?

Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

so dust + breath/spirit = living soul.

death = dust - spirit.

Now did Adam Exist before God created Him? no so then he was not some living spirit that suddenly got a body at creation.

Hence the little girl simply received that essential element that God gives that allows her to live again.

Greek philosophy introduced the idea of the immortal soul or spirit. and People apply it to vague scriptures without letting the whole bible speak for itself.



That girl was not up in heaven or paradise then suddenly pulled back to her earthly body. she was dead, gone until Jesus restored here life by his own breath/spirit.

blessings.
I agree, this Platonic idea has invaded the church for centuries.
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
The soul is not the spirit.
The soul and the spirit is one by can also be separate depending on how it is used in context of scripture.
The soul and the spirit are the two primary immaterial aspects that Scripture ascribes to humanity. It can be confusing to attempt to discern the precise differences between the two. The word “spirit” refers only to the immaterial facet of humanity. Human beings have a spirit, but we are not spirits. However, in Scripture, only believers are said to be spiritually alive (1 Corinthians 2:11;Hebrews 4:12;James 2:26), while unbelievers are spiritually dead (Ephesians 2:1-5;Colossians 2:13). In Paul's writing, the spiritual was pivotal to the life of the believer (1 Corinthians 2:14;3:1;Ephesians 1:3;5:19;Colossians 1:9;3:16). The spirit is the element in humanity which gives us the ability to have an intimate relationship with God. Whenever the word “spirit” is used, it refers to the immaterial part of humanity that “connects” with God, who Himself is spirit (John 4:24).

The word “soul” can refer to both the immaterial and material aspects of humanity. Unlike human beingshavinga spirit, human beingsaresouls. In its most basic sense, the word “soul” means “life.” However, beyond this essential meaning, the Bible speaks of the soul in many contexts. One of these is humanity’s eagerness to sin (Luke 12:26). Humanity is naturally evil, and our souls are tainted as a result. The life principle of the soul is removed at the time of physical death (Genesis 35:18;Jeremiah 15:2). The soul, as with the spirit, is the center of many spiritual and emotional experiences (Job 30:25;Psalm 43:5;Jeremiah 13:17). Whenever the word “soul” is used, it can refer to the whole person, whether alive or in the afterlife.

In the case of Matthew 10:28 we can see the context is the spirit, because it mentions both the material (body) and the immaterial (spirit) part of humanity.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Would you go down on record with God what such statements are not to be taken as literal, yet John who saw those things, heard those things, attested that they are truth? How can truth be cloaked in debatable metaphors and still be truth?

Until the word of God plainly identifies a doctrinal statement as a metaphor of the truth, it must be taken as a literal truth. What followed the revelation from Christ to John? Some extra-biblical writing?
I am not new to studying this topic. I once believed in Eternal Concious Torment (ECT) and defended that and then went to being on the fence about Eternal Torment versus Conditionalism. I was on the fence, because I thought the majority of churches believed in ECT. However, just because something is popular, doesn't mean it is true.

Anyways, in my own indepth personal study, I have found that the Eternal Torment View actually allegorizes more Scripture than the Conditional View. To learn more about that, check out the following link. It is a write up I did while I was not entirely convinced of either view. But it includes charts so as to help folks understand this topic a little better.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1izUtIKFb-DLSA-gnWs3UtW-i2Z6jatEQ593X259hP2M/mobilebasic?hl=en_US

Another problem you are going to be faced with is that you cannot explain how God is loving and yet He is able to torture folks beyond what the crime actually calls for. Like torture forever for a finite amount of crimes. How is that fair and just? How would you feel if one of your unbelieving family members you loved was tortured by an enemy country for the majority of their life? Now add infinity to the equation. You know...punishing someone waaaaaaay beyond what justice demands for that crime? I mean, I get it. You believe the Bible says that. But the Bible is not a book where you just turn off your brain or heart. Logic and Morals go with the Bible, too. So you have to be a little more open minded about the love of God and how His Word does reflect that love.

What do I mean by open minded? Well, while I believe the KJV is the divinely inspired Word of God for our day, it used Old English which has a wide variety of meaning than how we understand certain words today.

This is important to understand because the Greek word for "ever" in Revelation 14:11 is "aion." This can be defined as a period of time or an age. If you were to look at Blue Letter Bible, you will see this Greek Word for English words such as "world" (Which can be substituted with the word "age").

Greek Lexicon :: G165 (KJV)
 
Last edited:
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
The question I would ask is what is the purpose for the disobedient and unbelievers to be judged by their works if they all get the same punishment any way ?
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Αnother Doctrine You Want to Doctor?

The Lord Jesus suffered incomprehensible suffering on the cross, paying our "Hell" there. Yet He was innocent -- God Himself suffered our "Hell." Merely the anticipation yielded as it were great drops of blood in the garden.

He gave His back to the smiters,
& His cheeks to them who plucked out the hair.
He hid not His face from shame & spitting.
His death was the ransom for all.
He cried, "My God, My God, why have you forsaken Me."

How much can an infinite God suffer in a few hours?

Can we really believe the intensity & extent of HIs suffering when He paid the penalty for our sins?

Surely he has born our griefs & carried our sorrows.

He was despised, and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and as one from whom men hide their face he was despised; and we esteemed him not.
53:4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows; yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. 5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. 6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and Jehovah hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.

53:7 He was oppressed, yet when he was afflicted he opened not his mouth; as a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and as a sheep that before its shearers is dumb, so he opened not his mouth. 8 By oppression and judgment he was taken away; and as for his generation, who among them considered that he was cut off out of the land of the living for the transgression of my people to whom the stroke was due? 9 And they made his grave with the wicked, and with a rich man in his death; although he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.


53:10 Yet it pleased Jehovah to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of Jehovah shall prosper in his hand. 11 He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by the knowledge of himself shall my righteous servant justify many; and he shall bear their iniquities. 12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he poured out his soul unto death, and was numbered with the transgressors: yet he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.

Is the horror of men paying for their own sins in the Lake of Fire any greater than the horror of Christ paying for our sins?

Is it reality which we do not want to believe?
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
The question I would ask is what is the purpose for the disobedient and unbelievers to be judged by their works if they all get the same punishment any way ?
Great question, Kenneth!

BTW, believers are also judged for their works. They get chastisement in this life and an evaluation at the Judgment Seat of Christ (the Bema of 1 & 2 Corinthians). Wood, Hay, & Stubble will be burned up -- not the believer though. Some are saved yet as through (dia) fire. In Rev 1 Christ has eyes like a flame of fire. Our God is a consuming fire.

In fact judgment is by works.

On the other hand salvation is not by works, but by grace.

It is well to distinguish the two doctrines.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Like torture forever for a finite amount of crimes. How is that fair and just?
An infinite person suffered for the sins of finite men. Is that fair? Or is that grace?

The sin is against an infinite being, Jason. That infinite being also paid for everyone's torture, enduring the torture Himself. But if you insist on paying it yourself, you may have at it.
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
Great question, Kenneth!

BTW, believers are also judged for their works. They get chastisement in this life and an evaluation at the Judgment Seat of Christ (the Bema of 1 & 2 Corinthians). Wood, Hay, & Stubble will be burned up -- not the believer though. Some are saved yet as through (dia) fire. In Rev 1 Christ has eyes like a flame of fire. Our God is a consuming fire.

In fact judgment is by works.

On the other hand salvation is not by works, but by grace.

It is well to distinguish the two doctrines.


Yes both believers and the disobedient/unbelievers get judged by works.
Believers get rewards for their obedience, and the disobedient/unbelievers get longer punishments based on how bad they were.
 

Reborn

Senior Member
Nov 16, 2014
4,087
217
63
I am not new to studying this topic. I once believed in Eternal Concious Torment (ECT) and defended that and then went to being on the fence about Eternal Torment versus Conditionalism. I was on the fence, because I thought the majority of churches believed in ECT. However, just because something is popular, doesn't mean it is true.

Anyways, in my own indepth personal study, I have found that the Eternal Torment View actually allegorizes more Scripture than the Conditional View. To learn more about that, check out the following link. It is a write up I did while I was not entirely convinced of either view. But it includes charts so as to help folks understand this topic a little better.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1izUtIKFb-DLSA-gnWs3UtW-i2Z6jatEQ593X259hP2M/mobilebasic?hl=en_US

Another problem you are going to be faced with is that you cannot explain how God is loving and yet He is able to torture folks beyond what the crime actually calls for. Like torture forever for a finite amount of crimes. How is that fair and just? How would you feel if one of your unbelieving family members you loved was tortured by an enemy country for the majority of their life? Now add infinity to the equation. You know...punishing someone waaaaaaay beyond what justice demands for that crime? I mean, I get it. You believe the Bible says that. But the Bible is not a book where you just turn off your brain or heart. Logic and Morals go with the Bible, too. So you have to be a little more open minded about the love of God and how His Word does reflect that love.

What do I mean by open minded? Well, while I believe the KJV is the divinely inspired Word of God for our day, it used Old English which has a wide variety of meaning than how we understand certain words today.

This is important to understand because the Greek word for "ever" in Revelation 14:11 is "aion." This can be defined as a period of time or an age. If you were to look at Blue Letter Bible, you will see this Greek Word for English words such as "world" (Which can be substituted with the word "age").

Greek Lexicon :: G165 (KJV)
I understand and have probably pondered this issue longer than any other topic.
I'm with you, it's too hard to comprehend a punishment this severe.

I've read great points on both sides in my studies too, but I realized His ways are not our ways.
I think your ideas might just be wishful thinking though Jason?
For ever means for ever in this case. Heaven is, what makes us think that hell will be any different?
Just because we don't like this "side" of God?
Not our call.

.....Hell is a place that every person unsaved more or less wanted while on earth .....a place where there is no God.
 
May 2, 2014
1,060
12
0
I understand and have probably pondered this issue longer than any other topic.
I'm with you, it's too hard to comprehend a punishment this severe.

I've read great points on both sides in my studies too, but I realized His ways are not our ways.
I think your ideas might just be wishful thinking though Jason?
For ever means for ever in this case. Heaven is, what makes us think that hell will be any different?
Just because we don't like this "side" of God?
Not our call.

.....Hell is a place that every person unsaved more or less wanted while on earth .....a place where there is no God.
Hi Reborn,

Much of the confusion comes from a mistranslation of the words "Owlam" and "Aionios." They don't mean forever. Both words mean a long time, but they don't mean forever. Jude speaks of Sodom and Gomorrah as examples of eternal fire and yet they are not burning today, thus "aionios" fire doesn't mean eternal.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Hi Reborn,

Much of the confusion comes from a mistranslation of the words "Owlam" and "Aionios." They don't mean forever. Both words mean a long time, but they don't mean forever. Jude speaks of Sodom and Gomorrah as examples of eternal fire and yet they are not burning today, thus "aionios" fire doesn't mean eternal.
Methinks the confusion comes from wishful thinkers who want to explain away what is clear teaching.
 

Reborn

Senior Member
Nov 16, 2014
4,087
217
63
Hi Reborn,

Much of the confusion comes from a mistranslation of the words "Owlam" and "Aionios." They don't mean forever. Both words mean a long time, but they don't mean forever. Jude speaks of Sodom and Gomorrah as examples of eternal fire and yet they are not burning today, thus "aionios" fire doesn't mean eternal.
Hello,
I forgot to say....I trust God is just.
Either side of the argument has rational points to me.
Even though I believe for ever means for ever........out of all my stances....I truly hope I am wrong on this one.
God Bless.
 
Sep 16, 2014
1,666
100
48
An infinite person suffered for the sins of finite men. Is that fair? Or is that grace?

The sin is against an infinite being, Jason. That infinite being also paid for everyone's torture, enduring the torture Himself. But if you insist on paying it yourself, you may have at it.
Unrepentant sinners earn that.
 
Sep 16, 2014
1,666
100
48
Hello,
I forgot to say....I trust God is just.
Either side of the argument has rational points to me.
Even though I believe for ever means for ever........out of all my stances....I truly hope I am wrong on this one.
God Bless.
It is the unrepentant sinners that ought to wish it wasn't so. The Redeemed will not be conscious of their problems, not shedding tears of regret.
 

Reborn

Senior Member
Nov 16, 2014
4,087
217
63
It is the unrepentant sinners that ought to wish it wasn't so. The Redeemed will not be conscious of their problems, not shedding tears of regret.
I am only a human at the moment, so I still feel sympathy for the lost, it's my caring side.
...that is why I said I wished I was wrong.
I still believe for ever is for ever.
 
Last edited:

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Paul has described separations of body and soul from the body, and spirit from all.
Swordsman, did you leave out or make a typo above? How is a body going to be separated from the body?
Perhaps you have some verses to post where soul is not explainable as life or person?

Forget Plato.
Yes. But what I have read of Plato is dialogues, not pontifications. In other words, you find a bunch of guys arguing with each other (compare Job). I don't think that in Plato's dialogues you find him asserting anything at all. But characters are arguing with each other. It may be that his character of Socrates in the debates is the character that Plato thinks has the best argument.

I think that much of what people say about Plato is by people who have not studied him.
 
Sep 16, 2014
1,666
100
48
Hi Reborn,

Much of the confusion comes from a mistranslation of the words "Owlam" and "Aionios." They don't mean forever. Both words mean a long time, but they don't mean forever. Jude speaks of Sodom and Gomorrah as examples of eternal fire and yet they are not burning today, thus "aionios" fire doesn't mean eternal.
It "just" means ages of ages, eons of eons when the word combines ages and ages. Maybe at the end of those God will actually make it all cease to exist for them. Men of earth often say eons represent millions of years, into the billions, which can be held to them by God.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
I am only a human at the moment, so I still feel empathy for the lost, it's my caring side.
...that is why I said I wished I was wrong.
I still believe for ever is for ever.
In my vocabulary empathy is not sympathy, but detecting emotions, whether you care for the person or not.

Let us stop and think: How much sympathy do we have for the sufferings of Christ?
 
May 2, 2014
1,060
12
0
Methinks the confusion comes from wishful thinkers who want to explain away what is clear teaching.
What clear teaching is that? There is passage after passage that tells us what happens to the wicked. As I've pointed out that the aionios fire that is in Jude is not eternal, likewise, there are many passages that use the term Owlam that are not eternal, thus the word doesn't mean eternal. It's translated that way because translators have a theological position that they bring to the text.