Total Depravity

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,940
13,614
113
Probably because sin comes to life whenever a person reached the age of accountabiity and devils use the child's culture's laws to encourage and deceive the child into sin nd death. In every case, sin came ,alive again.
you sure about that?


Proverbs 20:11​
Even a child is known by his deeds,
Whether what he does is pure and right.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,062
6,873
113
62
Not saying I disagree or anything here:

Paul said when there is no Law that sin does not count as sin.
13 For up until the Torah, sin was in the world; but sin does not count as sin when there is no law.

So are you saying the Law exists "now" and that sin counts as sin?

We know in the time of Noah the world was wicked and God destroyed them. But Paul is saying during that time because there was "no Law" that sin was not counted as sin. So for sin to count as sin there must be the Law.

So are you saying the Law exists "now" and that sin counts as sin?
Again, Paul's point in establishing that no sin is accrued when there is no law in place was to show that no one should have died from Adam to Moses because there was no law. But people were in fact dying. How could this be if there was no law to accrue sin? And his explanation is that those who died did so because God placed Adam's transgression on their accounts.
Also, and again, unsaved individuals are under the law. They will be judged according to it. Those in Christ are no longer under condemnation. The law is powerless to bring judgment upon them. The law only affects those subject to it.
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
4,321
714
113
Again, Paul's point in establishing that no sin is accrued when there is no law in place was to show that no one should have died from Adam to Moses because there was no law. But people were in fact dying. How could this be if there was no law to accrue sin? And his explanation is that those who died did so because God placed Adam's transgression on their accounts.
Also, and again, unsaved individuals are under the law. They will be judged according to it. Those in Christ are no longer under condemnation. The law is powerless to bring judgment upon them. The law only affects those subject to it.
Actually, Paul's point is that sin brought death. And even though sin was not counted as sin death was still counted as death.
Which could be what you said but in different terms.

Does the Law exist today?
 
Jun 29, 2024
39
12
8
57
The view you posited and believe never addresses the concerns in the original post you responded to.
I copied this from the post I posted:

This separation, as described in the Bible, remained unbridged until the arrival of Jesus, referred to as the Son of Man, was born of a virgin, conceived by the Holy Spirit, and thus, was not subject to the inherited sinful nature passed down from Adam. As the second Adam, Christ came from heaven and lived a sinless life, which qualified Him as the only perfect sacrifice. His purpose was to restore the broken relationship between humanity and God. Through faith in Jesus, individuals can experience a spiritual rebirth, becoming 'born again,' and reestablish their connection with God.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,062
6,873
113
62
Actually, Paul's point is that sin brought death. And even though sin was not counted as sin death was still counted as death.
Which could be what you said but in different terms.

Does the Law exist today?
Yeah, I'm pretty sure you haven't understood my point on either issue. But thanks for the discussion.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,062
6,873
113
62
I copied this from the post I posted:

This separation, as described in the Bible, remained unbridged until the arrival of Jesus, referred to as the Son of Man, was born of a virgin, conceived by the Holy Spirit, and thus, was not subject to the inherited sinful nature passed down from Adam. As the second Adam, Christ came from heaven and lived a sinless life, which qualified Him as the only perfect sacrifice. His purpose was to restore the broken relationship between humanity and God. Through faith in Jesus, individuals can experience a spiritual rebirth, becoming 'born again,' and reestablish their connection with God.
I have no problem with anything stated here, but this isn't the post I was referring to, but another you posted.
 
Jun 29, 2024
39
12
8
57
I have no problem with anything stated here, but this isn't the post I was referring to, but another you posted.
Ok....could you do me a favor and copy it and post it for me so I can see what you are talking about. I am new here and it's hard for me to navigate through all the posts.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,062
6,873
113
62
Ok....could you do me a favor and copy it and post it for me so I can see what you are talking about. I am new here and it's hard for me to navigate through all the posts.
It's not a problem. I believe I understand your position on the topic. And our discussion I feel addressed all the pertinent points. We simply disagree.

That we were able to do so amicably was a nice change of pace around here. I truly do appreciate the discussion. Grace and peace.
 

Bob-Carabbio

Well-known member
Jun 24, 2020
1,618
810
113
Total depravity... the first point that calvanists believe.

Please prove from the word the difference and which is correct,
Between....
We are born without sin, sinless.

We are born with sinful tendency but not sin.

We are born as one that has already sinned.
 
Jun 29, 2024
39
12
8
57
We are born with sinful tendency but not sin.
We are born as one that has already sinned.


This may seem strange but to address the question, I would combine the two points above.

I believe that we are all born sinners in the sense that we inherit a sinful nature due to Adam and Eve’s disobedience in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3). This is known as the doctrine of Original Sin.

Psalm 51:5 states, “Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me.”

Romans 5:12-21 explains, “Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned.”

However, it is important to clarify that an infant, having not yet made any personal choices, cannot be held accountable for personal sin. It would be strange to me if anyone tried to refute this. However, they are considered to have inherited the sinful nature, which is beyond their control. No human, except for Christ, has ever lived without sin. Inevitably, the infant will grow up and commit sins, as it is in human nature.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,114
30,243
113
However, it is important to clarify that an infant, having not yet made any personal choices, cannot be held accountable for personal sin. It would be strange to me if anyone tried to refute this. However, they are considered to have inherited the sinful nature, which is beyond their control. No human, except for Christ, has ever lived without sin. Inevitably, the infant will grow up and commit sins, as it is in human nature.
Those who bring babies into the equation just seem to be trying to emotionally manipulate others. God says flesh is like grass. Why do we want to make of ourselves more than that? It is the same problem Adam and Eve had: pride of life. Should any be wished good luck trying to manipulate God? No, I think not. I trust He is good. What He does with babies is just regardless of what it is.


Isaiah 40:6B-8
:)
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,505
468
83
you sure about that?


Proverbs 20:11​
Even a child is known by his deeds,
Whether what he does is pure and right.
The same thing happened with Adam, Eve and Cain. The commandment came to Adam and Eve. Sin was not in them. Satan tempted Eve and she was deceived and yielded to sin, Sin entered into her and she developed a sense of separation from God. in her heart and she began to die physically.
Adam had no sin, He disobeyed and sin came to life in a human for the second time. He developed a sense of alienation form God in his heart and his physical body began to die.
Cain and Abel were expressing thankfulness to God. Abel did this by freely offering of the firstfruits of their produce and his offering was pleasing to God. The Bible does not say that sin had yet entered Abel. Cain was not as thankful and gave a delayed offering of his later crop.. God was not pleased with Cain's imperfect offering. The commandment came to Cain to keep sin out. Cain yielded to sin, and killed his brother. Sin entered into Cain and again sin had come alive. in another person,.
 
Jun 29, 2024
39
12
8
57
Those who bring babies into the equation just seem to be trying to emotionally manipulate others. God says flesh is like grass. Why do we want to make of ourselves more than that? It is the same problem Adam and Eve had: pride of life. Should any be wished good luck trying to manipulate God? No, I think not. I trust He is good. What He does with babies is just regardless of what it is.


Isaiah 40:6B-8
:)



Sorry if I offended you.....I was just answering a post. I thought I was anyway.
SIsaiah 40
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,114
30,243
113


Sorry if I offended you.....I was just answering a post. I thought I was anyway.
SIsaiah 40
Hey, no worries, as I was not trying to offend you in any way, either... it was more addressing the whole issue of babies, which people do bring up from time to time and it does very much strike me as being an attempt to emotionally manipulate others, which I was not accusing you of, as I realize it has been part of the convo for a few posts at least. I think what someone else was trying to say is that people need to be born again to attain to life ever after, for the natural man, born but once, dies twice, whereas those born twice, die but once. This is an act of God and we do not control whom God chooses to quicken to new life. What I do know is that God is good.
 
Mar 23, 2016
7,021
1,674
113
Cain and Abel were expressing thankfulness to God. Abel did this by freely offering of the firstfruits of their produce and his offering was pleasing to God. The Bible does not say that sin had yet entered Abel. Cain was not as thankful and gave a delayed offering of his later crop.. God was not pleased with Cain's imperfect offering.
In Hebrews 11:4 we read by faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain.

In Romans 10:17 we read faith by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

In order for Abel to have brought his offering "by faith", there must have been a "word of God" he had "heard" ... even though Scripture is silent on what he heard.

Cain's offering was not accepted by God because Cain did not bring his offering "by faith".

FOOTNOTE
tn The Hebrew term מִנְחָה(minkhah, “offering”) is a general word for tribute, a gift, or an offering. It is the main word used in Lev 2 for the dedication offering. This type of offering could be comprised of vegetables. The content of the offering (vegetables, as opposed to animals) was not the critical issue, but rather the attitude of the offerer.
.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,505
468
83
In Hebrews 11:4 we read by faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain.

In Romans 10:17 we read faith by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

In order for Abel to have brought his offering "by faith", there must have been a "word of God" he had "heard" ... even though Scripture is silent on what he heard.

Cain's offering was not accepted by God because Cain did not bring his offering "by faith".

FOOTNOTE
tn The Hebrew term מִנְחָה(minkhah, “offering”) is a general word for tribute, a gift, or an offering. It is the main word used in Lev 2 for the dedication offering. This type of offering could be comprised of vegetables. The content of the offering (vegetables, as opposed to animals) was not the critical issue, but rather the attitude of the offerer.
.
Do you agree with me that it is not required that one have a specific command to do X in order to do X by daith? For instance, if I believe God is kind and good and all the good I have is through Him, I can devise my own way to express that faith, without God beforehand prescribing how I must do so.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,505
468
83
We are born with sinful tendency but not sin.
We are born as one that has already sinned.


This may seem strange but to address the question, I would combine the two points above.

I believe that we are all born sinners in the sense that we inherit a sinful nature due to Adam and Eve’s disobedience in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3). This is known as the doctrine of Original Sin.

Psalm 51:5 states, “Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me.”

Romans 5:12-21 explains, “Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned.”

However, it is important to clarify that an infant, having not yet made any personal choices, cannot be held accountable for personal sin. It would be strange to me if anyone tried to refute this. However, they are considered to have inherited the sinful nature, which is beyond their control. No human, except for Christ, has ever lived without sin. Inevitably, the infant will grow up and commit sins, as it is in human nature.
Is there a scripture that says that we are all born with a sin nature?
Is there a scripture that says we are all born with sinful tendencies?
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
4,321
714
113
Is there a scripture that says that we are all born with a sin nature?
58:4 The wicked are strangers from the womb.
Speaking lies, they go astray from birth.
Is there a scripture that says we are all born with sinful tendencies?
58:4 The wicked are strangers from the womb.
Speaking lies, they go astray from birth.
5 Their venom is like a serpent’s venom,
like a deaf cobra shutting its ear—
6 not hearing the voice of charmers,
or a cunning spell binder.


51:7 Behold, I was born in iniquity and in sin
when my mother conceived me.


8:21 When Adonai smelled the soothing aroma, Adonai said in His heart, “I will never again curse the ground on account of man, even though the inclination of the heart of humankind is evil from youth. Nor will I ever again smite all living creatures, as I have done.
 
Jun 29, 2024
39
12
8
57
Is there a scripture that says that we are all born with a sin nature?
Is there a scripture that says we are all born with sinful tendencies?
Before I answer your question, answer me a couple of quick questions. Do you believe you have sinful tendencies now? If you say yes, then when did these tendencies enter into your life?
 
Mar 23, 2016
7,021
1,674
113
Do you agree with me that it is not required that one have a specific command to do X in order to do X by daith? For instance, if I believe God is kind and good and all the good I have is through Him, I can devise my own way to express that faith, without God beforehand prescribing how I must do so.
I'm not partial to the term "devise my own way to express that faith" ...

In a man-to-God scenario, no, you cannot "devise [your] own way". I believe there is only one Way to approach God and that is through the Lord Jesus Christ.

When it comes to man-to-man I believe God has given us enough instruction in His Word for us to live by faith.

In John 15 ... the parable of the Vine ... Jesus tells us He is the Vine, we are the branches. The fruit is a result of the Vine working in the branch ... it's not the branch that produces the fruit. The branch merely holds out the fruit to others, but it's the Vine's fruit.


John 15:4-5 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
.