Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new "Vatican

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#21
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new "Vati

We do not judge you...you judge yourself.
New International Version
Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God's one and only Son.John 3:18
And does believing that only God can write the bible perfectly mean I don't believe in God? Am I condemning myself by saying I believe in God more than I believe in what man writes of how he hears God's words? I think you are saying that you believe in the words that men translate more than you believe in men. I believe in God, not men.
 
Aug 31, 2013
159
3
0
#22
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new "Vati

There is a big problem with saying all bible versions are bad except the KJV which many KJV ONLY claim is inspired.

Here is the problem with that.


By claiming other versions are evil you also claim the word of God contained in the are evil. This is violates the scripture above and borderlines on pure lunacy.
Hi Danschance, There is still much of God's word even in the corrupt versions, but it is mixed with error and most Vatican Versions like the ESV (omits even more whole verses in the N.T. than the NIV, NASB) all omit literally thousands of words and change hundreds of meanings. Nobody seriously believes the ESV, or the NIV or the NASB is the infallible words of God and when others differ from it either in texts or meanings, that the others are wrong and theirs is right. Not even the people who put them out believe they are the infallible words of God.

So, how about you? Do YOU believe that ANY Bible in ANY language is the complete, inspired and 100% true words of God? Yes or No? What do you say? Thanks.
 
Aug 31, 2013
159
3
0
#23
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new "Vati

And does believing that only God can write the bible perfectly mean I don't believe in God? Am I condemning myself by saying I believe in God more than I believe in what man writes of how he hears God's words? I think you are saying that you believe in the words that men translate more than you believe in men. I believe in God, not men.

Hi RedTent. It is obvious that you do not believe that ANY Bible is the infallible words of God and this has now taken you to the next step - mysticism. You have now divorced "God" from His words and so you are free to imagine and create him in your own image or one that you find more palatable. You are a perfect example of where this whole thing is headed.

I even wrote an article about the attitude you express here. It is called "No Bible is my final Authority. God is!"

I doubt you will read it, but others might. May God have mercy and turn you around before you go any further down this mystical road of your own imagination. Here it is -
No Bible authority;Godis - Another King James Bible Believer
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#24
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new "Vati

Hi RedTent. It is obvious that you do not believe that ANY Bible is the infallible words of God and this has now taken you to the next step - mysticism. You have now divorced "God" from His words and so you are free to imagine and create him in your own image or one that you find more palatable. You are a perfect example of where this whole thing is headed.

I even wrote an article about the attitude you express here. It is called "No Bible is my final Authority. God is!"

I doubt you will read it, but others might. May God have mercy and turn you around before you go any further down this mystical road of your own imagination. Here it is -
No Bible authority;Godis - Another King James Bible Believer
sooooo.......you are claiming the KJV translators were infallibly inspired - like the Apostles and prophets?

then why did they add margin notes with alternative transcript readings? - answer - because they weren't sure, and did they best they could:)

anyways....come on - they were working for the King, and that's ok...if you are aware of it.

.......

1 Samuel 10:24
Samuel said to all the people, "Do you see him whom the LORD has chosen? Surely there is no one like him among all the people." So all the people shouted and said, "Long live the king!" - NASB (and all others:))


And Samuel said to all the people, See ye him whom the LORD hath chosen, that there is none like him among all the people? And all the people shouted, and said, God save the king. - KJV

and this from Steve Rudd:

"If God supervised the translation process so that the KJV is 100% error free, why did God not extend this supervision to the printers?":rolleyes:

k....i'm out - this is silly.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#25
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new "Vati

I see all of this as substantially similar to 21st century bardolatry, even the name King Shakespeare.

Bardolatry - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Victorian bardolatry
"The phenomenon became important in the Victorian era when many writers treated Shakespeare's works as a secular equivalent or replacement to the Bible.[8] "That King Shakespeare," the essayist Thomas Carlyle wrote in 1840, "does not he shine, in crowned sovereignty, over us all, as the noblest, gentlest, yet strongest of rallying signs; indestructible".[9]"

"The essential characteristic of bardolatry is that Shakespeare is presented as not only the greatest writer who ever lived, but also as the supreme intellect, the greatest psychologist, and the most faithful portrayer of the human condition and experience. In other words, bardolatry defines Shakespeare as the master of all human experience and of its intellectual analysis.
[10]"

People have their historical and literary obsessions, I have more than most, but KJV-only confuses that obsession with the Bible and with actually developing a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.

The result of that confusion is that when we (Christians) attack the position of KJV-onlyism, they
always and without fail find a way to interpret that as an attack on the King James Bible.

Then they encourage the rest of us to follow them...



The gospel?
:confused:

In KJV-only, it's
more important to be write page
after page after page about the correct spelling of Gaba/Geba in Ezra 2:26.

Ezra 2:26
The children of Ramah and Gaba, sixe hundred, twentie and one. (KJV 1611)

The children of Ramah and Gaba, six hundred twenty and one. (KJV Oxford 1769)

The children of Ramah and Geba, six hundred twenty and one. (KJV Pure Cambridge Edition)


k....coffee up the nose.

i like the KJV....i wish they'd let it be.
 
Aug 31, 2013
159
3
0
#26
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new "Vati

Hi Zone. Since you yourself do NOT believe that ANY Bible in any language is the complete and infallible words of God, then you will look for any thing at all that you think will justify your own unbelief. I understand that. The TEXT of the King James Bible has never changed. There was a change in spelling because English itself was not settled as to the spelling of English words. There was a change from Gothic print to Roman print, but this is not a change of the TEXT. There were the correction of some minor printing errors, but the TEXT has never changed.

In sharp contrast to this unchangeable TEXT, versions like the ESV, NIV, NASB, NKJV etc. are continually and DELIBERATELY changing not only their English texts (sometimes by literally thousands of words as the NASB 1995 did from the 1977 edition) but they are changing the underlying Hebrew and Greek texts as well - and this deliberately.

If you cannot see and appreciate the difference, then only God can open your eyes and give you the faith to believe in an infallible Bible and show you where to find it. It's been here for over 400 years now in our own English language and it is by FAR the best selling Book and the most widely distributed Book the world has ever seen. And it is the ONLY one believed by thousands even today to be the inerrant words of the living God. May God have mercy and open the eyes of more of His people. God bless.
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#27
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new "Vati

Hi RedTent. It is obvious that you do not believe that ANY Bible is the infallible words of God and this has now taken you to the next step - mysticism. You have now divorced "God" from His words and so you are free to imagine and create him in your own image or one that you find more palatable. You are a perfect example of where this whole thing is headed.

I even wrote an article about the attitude you express here. It is called "No Bible is my final Authority. God is!"

I doubt you will read it, but others might. May God have mercy and turn you around before you go any further down this mystical road of your own imagination. Here it is -
No Bible authority;Godis - Another King James Bible Believer
Your assumptions and judgments of me are not correct. I am not free to imagine anything, God is my creator. I am glad to hear you say you judge me perfect, but I am not. I must listen for God, I must not add to God's words.

I think that you are not hearing God, just as you think I am not. To trust in a translation as purely God's words is not listening to God. In the same way it would be if I went too far the other way as you are doing, and said I don't believe any of what the bible is saying. You are going too far in saying anything translated is purely God's word, and if I didn't believe what God has given us in translations I would be as far off as you are. You say I am going to my own mind for listening. I am studying ancient Hebrew, learning how the original ancient Hebrew was thought of and written. I am going to stong's for translations. I am delving into the word as much as I can. You are not. You are trusting the translations completely. I think my way is better for understanding God, you think your way is better. Anyway, we both read God's word.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#28
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new "Vati

Hi Zone. Since you yourself do NOT believe that ANY Bible in any language is the complete and infallible words of God, then you will look for any thing at all that you think will justify your own unbelief. I understand that. The TEXT of the King James Bible has never changed. There was a change in spelling because English itself was not settled as to the spelling of English words. There was a change from Gothic print to Roman print, but this is not a change of the TEXT. There were the correction of some minor printing errors, but the TEXT has never changed.

In sharp contrast to this unchangeable TEXT, versions like the ESV, NIV, NASB, NKJV etc. are continually and DELIBERATELY changing not only their English texts (sometimes by literally thousands of words as the NASB 1995 did from the 1977 edition) but they are changing the underlying Hebrew and Greek texts as well - and this deliberately.

If you cannot see and appreciate the difference, then only God can open your eyes and give you the faith to believe in an infallible Bible and show you where to find it. It's been here for over 400 years now in our own English language and it is by FAR the best selling Book and the most widely distributed Book the world has ever seen. And it is the ONLY one believed by thousands even today to be the inerrant words of the living God. May God have mercy and open the eyes of more of His people. God bless.
"KJV Only" advocates refuted! < click

take your time and refute all that.


what a waste of energy.....i doubt you know the Gospel, man...too busy looking for satan in modern translations.


and actually how dare you insinuate God did not ordain the NT in KOINE GREEK.
nobody prior to the English language had the Holy Spirit working in them?

i have a friend who reads Greek. he translates from it. and is quite happy with ESV....

why dont you leave the KJV alone and quit giving it a weirdo rep?

tsk.....in it again.

bye then
 
Aug 31, 2013
651
3
0
#29
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

By judging me as you have you are putting yourself in hell, for God cannot forgive you if you judge others so.

I believe that when we see the bible as coming from God's infallible mind, but interpreted by fallible humans who receive those words, we are letting ourselves see through the words to God. I think you are the one not able to see truth in God's words, for you are believing man's words, not God's words. That is not judging you as a person, it is saying you could understand scripture better with a different attitude.
Correct me if I'm wrong... but it seems to me if you praise one Bible over the other it's what we call Bibliolatry... making an IDOL over a translation.

As I understand it, it's the message that is holy, not the actual words. UNLESS someone looks at the Bible as some sorta magic compendium, and you must say the words in order, the same way with proper inflection and such. THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE THAT!!! I have met them. ( I was not invited back. :( )

So, the message, not the crappy dead tree bound in leather that is holy, right?
 
D

danschance

Guest
#30
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

Hi Danschance, There is still much of God's word even in the corrupt versions, but it is mixed with error and most Vatican Versions like the ESV (omits even more whole verses in the N.T. than the NIV, NASB) all omit literally thousands of words and change hundreds of meanings. Nobody seriously believes the ESV, or the NIV or the NASB is the infallible words of God and when others differ from it either in texts or meanings, that the others are wrong and theirs is right. Not even the people who put them out believe they are the infallible words of God.

So, how about you? Do YOU believe that ANY Bible in ANY language is the complete, inspired and 100% true words of God? Yes or No? What do you say? Thanks.
There is error in the KJV also.

Lucifer is a Latin word for Venus was inserted into the King James to make it look like that passage is all about satan. Lucifer is not found in any other translation except for the KJV and one other. Lucifer does appear in Jerome's Latin Vulgate as it identifies the morning star as Venus.

So the KJV has error in it, proving it was translated by men who made mistakes
 

willfollowsGod

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2011
1,515
66
48
33
#31
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

First of all, I would not say Bible are fallible, but I would say that based on developments of learning more about Hebrew and Greek and also new biblical manuscripts that the versions change. Now, the original manuscripts are infallible and inerrant, the translations try to be as infallible and inerrant as possible. They try to get the original Hebrew and Greek meaning. Is it hard? Yes, but we can trust these versions and even compare. But condemning versions and hopefully not the people using them is wrong and only divides the body of Christ. We are supposed to be telling people about Jesus through our actions and words how he died on a cross for our sins and rose from the dead on the third day. These are unfruitful arguments that only cause division and other vices. Focus on loving God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength and loving your neighbor as yourself. God can use any version that he wants that is of Him. But when we start bashing, criticizing harshly, etc the versions that have been used and claiming they are the new Vatican. You are not only dividing the body of Christ but giving Christians a bad name. Also, it gives me reasons not to associate with you or anyone who spews lies and makes outrageous claims. God bless.
 
Aug 31, 2013
159
3
0
#32
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

"KJV Only" advocates refuted! < click

take your time and refute all that.


what a waste of energy.....i doubt you know the Gospel, man...too busy looking for satan in modern translations.


and actually how dare you insinuate God did not ordain the NT in KOINE GREEK.
nobody prior to the English language had the Holy Spirit working in them?

i have a friend who reads Greek. he translates from it. and is quite happy with ESV....

why dont you leave the KJV alone and quit giving it a weirdo rep?

tsk.....in it again.

bye then
Hi Zone. Maybe you and your friend are happy with the ESV and even translate Greek, but neither one of you believes in an actual hold it in your hands, read and believe every word is the infallible word of the living God. You will never take a stand on any Bible in ANY language (including your "the" Greek and Hebrew) as being the inerrant words of God and when others differ from it either in TEXTS or meanings, then the others are wrong and yours is right. Why? Because you simply do not believe that ANY of them are the 100% true words of God. If your friend is "happy" (and that's all that really matters, right?) with his Vatican Version called the ESV, then he has settled for an ever changing Vatican Version - Has he got the one with the Apocryphal books and the Catholic imprimatur on it?

The ever changing ESV - Just another Vatican Version. Send this to your ESV using friend and see what he thinks.

The ESV - Another King James Bible Believer

"He that hath ears to hear, let him hear." Luke 8:8

God bless.
 
Aug 31, 2013
159
3
0
#33
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

Hi Zone. One other thing. You gave us a link to an anti-KJB site. I not only have seen this site before, but I actually took the examples it gave and wrote an article about the silly things they bring up as "errors". Here it is - I've actually read the link you gave me. How about you read the rebuttal to it?

Answering the Typical Anti-King James Bible Site

Answering anti-KJB sites - Another King James Bible Believer
 
Aug 31, 2013
159
3
0
#34
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

when we start bashing, criticizing harshly, etc the versions that have been used and claiming they are the new Vatican. You are not only dividing the body of Christ but giving Christians a bad name. Also, it gives me reasons not to associate with you or anyone who spews lies and makes outrageous claims. God bless.
Hi willfollowsGod, Did you actually READ the article? All those quotes about how the modern versions are the direct result of the Vatican making a formal agreement with UBS to create an "interconfessional" text are taken directly from the Vatican's own website and right out of the pages of the Nestle-Aland critical Greek text your versions like the ESV, NIV, NASB and the modern Catholic versions are ALL based on. I did not make this stuff up. NOBODY believes or defends these modern versions as being the infallible words of God. NOBODY. At least they have that much sense still working for them. The whore of Babylon says "Come to Momma" and God says "Come out of her my people". You choose.

"He that hath ears to hear, let him hear." Luke 8:8
 
Aug 31, 2013
651
3
0
#35
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

Hi Zone. Maybe you and your friend are happy with the ESV and even translate Greek, but neither one of you believes in an actual hold it in your hands, read and believe every word is the infallible word of the living God. You will never take a stand on any Bible in ANY language (including your "the" Greek and Hebrew) as being the inerrant words of God and when others differ from it either in TEXTS or meanings, then the others are wrong and yours is right. Why? Because you simply do not believe that ANY of them are the 100% true words of God. If your friend is "happy" (and that's all that really matters, right?) with his Vatican Version called the ESV, then he has settled for an ever changing Vatican Version - Has he got the one with the Apocryphal books and the Catholic imprimatur on it?

The ever changing ESV - Just another Vatican Version. Send this to your ESV using friend and see what he thinks.

The ESV - Another King James Bible Believer

"He that hath ears to hear, let him hear." Luke 8:8

God bless.
Making an idol out of a bible is sinful. It puts the book before God.

The message is what is infallible, not your translation of a compilation of old Greek etc.... texts.

Obsession is one of the deadly sins, isn't it?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#36
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

Hi Zone. One other thing. You gave us a link to an anti-KJB site. I not only have seen this site before, but I actually took the examples it gave and wrote an article about the silly things they bring up as "errors". Here it is - I've actually read the link you gave me. How about you read the rebuttal to it?

Answering the Typical Anti-King James Bible Site

Answering anti-KJB sites - Another King James Bible Believer
They start off their very long article with their Introductory notes.

They state “This outline is designed to refute the view that the King James Version (KJV) is the only modern Bible on earth that is 100% accurate and error free.

1. “Foremost, we feel that the KJV is an EXCELLENT translation, but not the ONLY excellent translation.”

Notice the typical “praise” and then “bash” method these Bible critics use. On the one hand they tell us the KJV is an “EXCELLENT” translation (Caps are theirs!), and then they proceed to tell us the King James Bible is riddled with what they call “Indisputable, universally recognized errors in the KJV” and “spurious passages”.

This "first praise” and "then bash” methodology is typified by the liberal RSV and the new, ever changing, gender bender “Catholic” NIVs in the comments made by their editors. For example:

In the Preface of the RSV we find them first saying: “The King James Version has with good reason been termed “the noblest monument of English prose. We owe to it an incalculable debt.” Then in the very next sentence they say: “Yet the King James Version HAS GRAVE DEFECTS....these defects are so many and so serious as to call for revision of the English translation....The KJV of the N.T. was based upon a Greek text that was marred by mistakes.”

The RSV continues attacking the King James Bible by further stating: "The King James Version of the New Testament was based upon a Greek text that was marred by mistakes, containing the accumulated errors of fourteen centuries of manuscript copying....We now possess many more ancient manuscripts of the N.T. and are far better equipped to seek to recover the original wording of the Greek text." - page vii of the RSV Preface. (This argument sounds Oh, sooo familiar, doesn't it? ;-)

.....


thats your rebuttal:rolleyes:




btw:

All the attacks coming today are generally directed against ONE Book and that Book is the King James Bible. Nobody who is anti-KJB or who criticizes its texts and its translations believes in the Infallibility of the Bible - ANY Bible. Those are the facts.

The Bible itself tells us that there will be a falling away from the faith in the last days (2 Thes. 2) and that the Whore of Babylon will arise to deceive the whole world with the wine of her fornication. (Rev. 18) Anybody who is using a UBS (United Bible Society) based version is in fact using a Vatican Version and is being deceived.`

*cough*
the Whore of Babylon....where does scripture use that term.
and it aint ROME...LOL

YAWN
 
Aug 31, 2013
159
3
0
#37
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

There is error in the KJV also.

Lucifer is a Latin word for Venus was inserted into the King James to make it look like that passage is all about satan. Lucifer is not found in any other translation except for the KJV and one other. Lucifer does appear in Jerome's Latin Vulgate as it identifies the morning star as Venus.

So the KJV has error in it, proving it was translated by men who made mistakes
Hi danschance. Sir, you're information here is completely wrong. You really have not studied this out for yourself, have you.

"Lucifer or morning star"?

Lucifer or Morning Star? - Another King James Bible Believer

Just part of what you will find here that shows your statement "Lucifer is not found in any other translation except for the KJV and one other." is stated from complete ignorance is this:

Fourthly, many Bible critics say Lucifer is a mistranslation of the Hebrew and that the KJB has been responsible for this misconception and confusion. It should be pointed out that the KJB is not the first or the only Bible version to so understand and translate this passage in Isaiah 14:12. All English Bibles before the KJB of 1611 also have the word Lucifer in them. This includes Wycliffe 1395, Coverdale's 1535, the Great Bible 1540, Matthew's Bible (John Rogers) 1549, Bishop's Bible 1568, and the Geneva Bible 1599 - "How art thou fallen from heauen, O Lucifer, sonne of the morning?".

Lucifer is also the reading found in Daniel Webster's 1833 translation, Noyes Translation 1869 and Darby's 1890 version. The Romanian Cornilescu Bible - "Cum ai căzut din cer, Luceafăr strălucitor, fiu al zorilor!" as well as the 1569 Spanish Sagradas Escrituras read Lucifer - "¡Cómo caíste del cielo, oh Lucifer, hijo de la mañana!" Lucifer is also the reading of the 2004 Spanish Reina Valera Gomez bible, that can be seen here http://www.reinavaleragomez.com/RVGhtml/index.html . It says: ¡Cómo caíste del cielo, oh Lucifer, hijo de la mañana! Cortado fuiste por tierra, tú que debilitabas las naciones." Czech Kralika (1613) lucifere; the Albanian Bible - "Vallë, si ke rënë nga qielli, o Lucifer". The New Italian Diodati of 1991, as well as the Conferenza Episcopale Italiana version read: "Come mai sei caduto dal cielo, o Lucifero". The Portuguese O Livro of 2000 also reads the same with - "Como caíste do céu, ó Lúcifer - estrela matinal!". The French Sainte Bible of 1759 by Louis Lemaistre de Sacy also reads Lucifer - "Comment es-tu tombé du ciel. Lucifer, toi qui paroissois si brillant au point du jour?" -

http://www.lookhigher.net/biblesfrancais/sacysaintebible1759/esaie/14.html - Lucifer is also the reading in the 1982 NKJV, the 21st Century KJV 1994, The Brenton Translation 1851, the Calvin Bible 1855, the Word of Yah translation of 1993, the 2008 Natural Israelite Bible, the 2008 Ancient Roots Transliteration Bible - http://www.ancientrootsbible.com/artb-bible-search.html -, the 2001 Urim-Thummin Version, the 2000 English Jubilee Bible, the Knox Bible 'You' Version 2009, The Septuagint Bible of 1954 by C.A. Muses, the Old Testament According to the Septuagint of 2009 - "How is Lucifer fallen from heaven, that rose up in the morning!"- http://orthodoxengland.org.uk/pdf/ot/isaiah.pdf and the Third Millenium Bible 1998.

Ryrie's Scofield bible and Dakes annotated bible make reference to the fact that many early church fathers (among these Tertullian 160-220 A.D., Origen 185-254 A. D., and Gregory the Great), saw the passage in Isaiah 14 as referring to the fall of Satan. The idea that the passage refers to the fall of Satan did NOT originate with Jerome (384 A.D), though he also believed this. Tertullian lived almost 200 years before Jerome, and he held this view.

Bible versions that contain the Scofield notes, including the NIV Scofield edition, say regarding the Lucifer of Isaiah 14:12: "Verses 12-14 evidently refer to Satan, who, as prince of this world-system (See Scofield "Revelation 13:8) is the real unseen ruler of the successive world- powers. Tyre, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome, etc. (see Ezekiel 28:12-14) Lucifer, "day-star," can be none other that Satan. This tremendous passage marks the beginning of sin in the universe. When Lucifer said, "I will," sin began.

The Encyclopedia Britannica says: "The Church Fathers interpreted the words of Jesus in Luke 10:18, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven," as a reference to this passage in Isaiah, so that "Lucifer" came to be regarded as the name of Satan before his fall."

May I suggest you actually take the time to read the entire article and you will see that Lucifer is correct and "morning star" is not. The King James Bible is always right. May God help you to see that. God bless.
 
Aug 31, 2013
159
3
0
#38
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

The Bible itself tells us that there will be a falling away from the faith in the last days (2 Thes. 2) and that the Whore of Babylon will arise to deceive the whole world with the wine of her fornication. (Rev. 18) Anybody who is using a UBS (United Bible Society) based version is in fact using a Vatican Version and is being deceived.`

*cough*
the Whore of Babylon....where does scripture use that term.
and it aint ROME...LOL

YAWN
Hi Zone. So, you don't think the term "whore of Babylon" comes from the Bible and you don't think it's Rome, huh?

Revelation 17:1-5 describes the great whore, and on her forehead is written Mystery, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the earth. As for this not being Rome, you are woefully misinformed.

Catholic St. Joseph New American Bible 1970 - Footnotes on Revelation 17:1-6 "Babylon, a symbolic name (v. 5) of Rome, is graphically described as the great harlot." Revelation 17:9 Footnote - "Seven hills: of Rome."

Catholic Douay 1950 - Footnote on Revelation 17:11 - "The beast spoken of here seems to be the Roman Empire, as in chapter 13."

Catholic New Jerusalem Bible 1985 - Footnote on Revelation 16:10 "the seat of the beast"- "Rome, type of all gentile powers hostile to God." Revelation 17:6 "the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus" - Footnote - "Like Jerusalem, Rome is guilty of a double crime: idolatry (v.4) and murder. (v.6)". Footnote on Revelation 17:9 "the great whore that sitteth upon many waters" - "Here it is Rome the idolatrous." Revelation 17:9 "The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth." Footnote - "The seven heads are the seven hills of Rome."

The New John Gill Exposition of the Entire Bible

Revelation 17:1 - And there came one of the seven angels that had the seven vials…"this is the seventh and last angel, concerned in the utter destruction of antichrist: and therefore proposes to John to show him the judgment of the great whore: and talked with me, saying unto me, come hither: he conversed with him in a friendly manner, see (Zechariah 1:9) and desires him to come nearer to him, and go along with him, adding, I will show unto thee the judgment of the great whore; that noted and famous one, known before to John by the names of Jezabel and Babylon, who taught and caused many to commit fornication, (Revelation 2:20) (Revelation 14:8) and is no other than Rome Papal; for that a city or state is meant is clear from (Revelation 17:18) and it is usual for idolatrous or apostate cities to be called whores or harlots, see (Isaiah 1:21) (Ezekiel 23:2-4) (Nahum 3:4) and she is called a "great" one, because of the largeness of the Papal see; and because of the multitude of persons, the kings of the earth, and the inhabitants of it, with whom the Romish antichrist has committed spiritual fornication, or idolatry.”

Adam Clarke Commentary - Revelation 17

"Saw a woman sit upon a scarlet-coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. "
No doubt can now be entertained that this woman is the Latin Church, for she sits upon the beast with seven heads and ten horns, which has been already proved to be the Latin empire, because this empire alone contains the number 666. See Clarke on Revelation 13:18. This is a representation of the Latin Church in her highest state of antichristian prosperity, for she SITS UPON the scarlet coloured beast, a striking emblem of her complete domination over the secular Latin empire. The state of the Latin Church from the commencement of the fourteenth century to the time of the Reformation may be considered that which corresponds to this prophetic description in the most literal and extensive sense of the words; for during this period she was at her highest pitch of worldly grandeur and temporal authority. The beast is full of names of blasphemy; and it is well known that the nations, in support of the Latin or Romish Church, have abounded in blasphemous appellations, and have not blushed to attribute to themselves and to their Church the most sacred titles, not only blaspheming by the improper use of sacred names, but even by applying to its bishop those names which alone belong to God; for God hath expressly declared that he will not give his glory to another, neither his praise to graven images.”

Coffman Commentaries on the Old and New Testaments

Revelation 17 - I will show thee the judgment of the great harlot that sitteth upon many waters ...
But was she not seated upon a beast? Yes, but both she and the beast rise from the teeming populations of the earth. Harlot ... "In Isa. 1:21, Jer. 2:20,31, etc., these terms are used to describe God's apostate people, those once joined to him in covenant relationship, but who had broken their marriage vow of faithfulness." "In the Old Testament, this imagery is commonly used to denote religious apostasy." "Is this harlot, then, Papal Rome? The answer is: Insofar as Papal Rome has wielded tyrannical power, turned persecutor, stood between the spirits of people and Christ, depraved the consciences of people, withheld the truth, sought aggrandizement and demonstrated the power of a political engine rather than that of a witness of Christ, she has inherited the features of Babylon."

Barnes’ Notes on the New Testament



Revelation 17 - Verse 2. With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication. Spiritual adultery. The meaning is, that Papal Rome, unfaithful to God, and idolatrous and corrupt, had seduced the rulers of the earth, and led them into the same kind of unfaithfulness, idolatry, and corruption. Compare Jeremiah 3:8-9; 5:7; 13:27; 23:14; Ezekiel 16:32; 23:37; Hosea 2:2 Hosea 4:2. How true this is in history need not be stated. All the princes and kings of Europe in the dark ages and for many centuries were, and not a few of them are now, entirely under the influence of Papal Rome.

J.N. Darby on Revelation 17 -

"The general character is the great active idolatress that has gained influence over the mass of the nations; next, that the kings of the earth have lived in guilty intimacy with her, seeking her favors, while those that dwell on the earth have lost their senses through her pernicious and inebriating influence. This is the general idea first given, a character plain enough to mark the Roman or Papal system."

There was a woman, a religious system, sitting on an imperial beast full of names of blasphemy, having the form which marked it Roman. The woman was gorgeously and imperially arrayed, had every human glory and ornament on her, and a rich cup of prostituting yet gross idolatries in her hand. "Abominations are simply idols; " filthiness of her fornication," all the horrible corruption that accompanies it. Her cup was full of them. She was in the desert; no springs of God were there. It was not, so to speak, God's land, no heavenly country. To spiritual understanding she bore on her forehead her character (yet one known only when spiritually known), of the great city of corruption, source of all seduction to men and of all idolatry in the earth: such was Popery.”

The Geneva Study Bible on Revelation 17 - “That harlot, the spiritual Babylon, which is Rome.”

Jamieson, Fausset and Brown Commentary on the Whole Bible- Revelation 17 -

”It cannot be pagan Rome, but papal Rome, if a particular seat of error be meant, but I incline to think that the judgment (Re 18:2) and the spiritual fornication (Re 18:3), though finding their culmination in Rome, are not restricted to it, but comprise the whole apostate Church, Roman, Greek, and even Protestant, so far as it has been seduced from its "first love" (Re 2:4) to Christ, the heavenly Bridegroom, and given its affections to worldly pomps and idols.”


Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary -

Revelation 17 -”This beast, the papacy, makes an eighth governor, and sets up idolatry again. 3. This beast had ten horns; which are said to be ten kings which have as yet received no kingdoms; as yet, that is, as some, shall not rise up till the Roman empire be broken in pieces; or, as others, shall not rise up till near the end of antichrist's reign, and so shall reign but as it were one hour with her, but shall for that time be very unanimous and very zealous in that interest, and entirely devoted to it, divesting themselves of their prerogatives and revenues (things so dear to princes), out of an unaccountable fondness for the papacy.”

People’s New Testament commentary on Revelation 17 -

“In the present chapter (17:16) it is stated that the ten horns, which become the strength of the beast, shall be turned upon the woman who is Mystery, Babylon, the Great. This implies a separation between the beast and the woman, between the secular power that had supported the Papacy and the Papacy itself.”


John Wesley’s Commentary on Revelation 17 -

“ From the time of Hildebrand, the blasphemous titles of the Pope have been abundantly multiplied. ... Mystery -This very word was inscribed on the front of the Pope's mitre, till some of the Reformers took public notice of it. Babylon the great - Benedict XIII., in his proclamation of the jubilee, A.D. 1725, explains this sufficiently. His words are, "To this holy city, famous for the memory of so many holy martyrs, run with religious alacrity. Hasten to the place which the Lord hath chose. Ascend to this new Jerusalem, whence the law of the Lord and the light of evangelical truth hath flowed forth into all nations, from the very first beginning of the church: the city most rightfully called 'The Palace,' placed for the pride of all ages, the city of the Lord, the Sion of the Holy One of Israel. This catholic and apostolical Roman church is the head of the world, the mother of all believers, the faithful interpreter of God and mistress of all churches." But God somewhat varies the style. The mother of harlots - The parent, ringleader, patroness, and nourisher of many daughters, that loosely copy after her. And abominations - Of every kind, spiritual and fleshly. Of the earth -In all lands. In this respect she is indeed catholic or universal. Verse 6. And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints -So that Rome may well be called, "The slaughter-house of the martyrs." She hath shed much Christian blood in every age; but at length she is even drunk with it, at the time to which this vision refers.”

Historicist interpreters, including Martin Luther, John Calvin and John Knox used the phrase "Whore of Babylon" to refer to the Roman Catholic Church.

The Whore of Babylon - Wikipedia article

Historicist interpreters commonly used the phrase "Whore of Babylon" to refer to the Roman Catholic Church. Reformation writers from Martin Luther (1483–1546) (who wrote On the Babylonian Captivity of the Church), John Calvin (1509–1564), and John Knox (1510–1572) (who wrote The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women) taught this association. The Roman Catholic Church denies the claim that it is being referred to by the Book of Revelation as the Whore of Babylon.

Identification of the Pope as the Antichrist was written into Protestant creeds such as the Westminster Confession of 1646. The identification of the Roman Catholic Church with the Whore of Babylon is kept in the Scofield Reference Bible (whose 1917 edition identified "ecclesiastical Babylon" with "apostate Christendom headed by the Papacy").
 
Aug 31, 2013
159
3
0
#39
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

A New Antichrist for a Credulous Church

A New Antichrist for a Credulous Church

"It is a fact of history that many well known Protestant leaders of past centuries have unhesitatingly denounced the Pope as the "Antichrist" and the Roman Catholic Church as the "Whore of Babylon". These include Martin Luther, John Bunyan, John Huss, John Wycliffe, John Calvin, William Tyndale, John Knox, John Wesley and Jonathan Edwards. The publishers of some old German editions of the Bible, circulated in the 15th century, went so far as to include illustrations which showed the Pope amongst the devils of Apocalyptic Hell. Old records of the Anabaptist churches include countless other lesser known names which could be added to this list; names of men and women whose testimony could not be silenced by oppression, persecution or even martyrdom.

In this Ecumenical age, it has become most unpopular to speak about the Catholic Church in this way. It is even less acceptable to identify the present Pope, who is so popular with all men, as the one who currently sits in the chair of Antichrist.

The descendants of the persecuted church have closed their eyes and ears to the lessons of history.

This change in attitude, has its origin early in the 19th century, when a number of prominent teachers began to promote another interpretation of the prophecies about the Antichrist, which took the spotlight off the historical Catholic Church. Instead , the Antichrist was presented as a mysterious evil man of the future, who would appear just prior to the second coming of Jesus. This man would gain power over the whole world and force all men to worship him as God. This clever fabrication was joined with other teaching about a "pre-tribulation rapture", which would remove Christians from the Earth prior to a series of terrible events, called the "Great Tribulation", associated with the rule of the Antichrist.

This is called the "FUTURIST" school of interpretation of prophecy, and stands opposed to the traditional "HISTORICAL" school." (End of article)



You can read a very modern presentation and exposition of why the Catholic church is the Whore of Babylon by reading this section of Dave Hunt's book "A Woman Rides the Beast" found here online -


A Woman Rides the Beast - A City on Seven Hills

I highly recommend and encourage anyone interested in this most vital topic to do a Google search of 'Richard Bennett". This brother in Christ, who was for years a Catholic priest, has tremendous teaching videos on various topics related to the doctrines of the Catholic church in contrast to the Bible. This man has a lot of Biblical truth to share with us and he has a deep love for the Catholic people.

Here is Richard Bennett's account of why he became a Catholic priest and how God dealt with him to bring him to faith in Christ alone as his Saviour -

An Overview of a Testimony by Richard Bennett Part 1 - YouTube

I also recommend this one about Evangelicals Embark to Papal Rome seen here -

Evangelicals Embark to Papal Rome - YouTube

See the Video by former Catholic Priest Richard Bennett called "Uncovering the Pope and the Papacy". It is a 57 minute video and I found it to be very interesting coming from a man who was once so immersed in the Catholic church. You can see it here -

YouTube

The supreme irony is that today in modern Christendom the majority of professing Christians are using and promoting the new Vatican Versions.

Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, NET etc. are the new "Catholic" bibles

Real Catholic bibles - Another King James Bible Believer

“Mystery, Babylon the Great, The Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth..is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit...and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication...Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins” Revelation 17:2-5; 18:2-4

See also - "James White - the Protestant Pope of the New Vatican Versions"

James White P.Pope VV - Another King James Bible Believer

If you are interested in learning more about what the Catholic Church believes and teaches, there is a complete Book online here from Chick Publications. You can purchase a hard copy if you wish, or simply read it online. There are links to specific topics. It is very interesting and informative. You can see it here -

'Understanding Roman Catholicism' by Rick Jones - Table of Contents
 
Aug 31, 2013
651
3
0
#40
Re: Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, Holman Standard, NET etc. are the new &quot;Vati

Hi Zone. So, you don't think the term "whore of Babylon" comes from the Bible and you don't think it's Rome, huh?
I can make a better case for protestant churches than you can for Rome. :) That should be another thread though.