Vaccination?
- Thread starter seed_time_harvest
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
Cardiomyopathy (weakened heart) is the leading cause of death from one week to 1 year after birth. The jab is also known to cause cardiomyopathy as a potential side effect.
If a jab caused weakness, every heart beat is a roll of the dice for a fatal result, death won't necessarily happen prior to birth.
If a jab caused weakness, every heart beat is a roll of the dice for a fatal result, death won't necessarily happen prior to birth.
That is putting it too mildly.
1. The word vaccine was FRAUDULENTLY applied to preparations which were full of lethal and toxic substances. That is medical fraud.
2. The testing was done inadequately and improperly. Indeed the net result should have been that all the "vaccines" were TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE and EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. When AstraZeneca tested their vaccine on monkeys, they all died. A few countries even banned them, but there should have been a general and total ban.
3. Not a single "vaccine" was capable of producing genuine immunity, since not a single one had an actual attenuated virus. Which is why they are producing more infections after vaccinations. See the state of Vermont results.
4. The long-term effects of these injections were totally disregarded.
5. FULL DISCLOSURE has never been given to any person who took the jab. It would have meant explaining the harmful and lethal effects of each and every one of the many substances within those vaccines. This was a violation of the Nuremberg Code. Had full disclosure been given not a single person would have accepted the jab.
6. The actual number of "vaccines" deaths and disabilities has never been disclosed, and never will. Medical fraud was committed in assigning vaccine deaths to COVID deaths or some other factor, or simply suppressing the reports. And this continues daily. Also the only entities which are even counting the adverse effects are the USA and the EU. What about the rest of the world?
1. The word vaccine was FRAUDULENTLY applied to preparations which were full of lethal and toxic substances. That is medical fraud.
2. The testing was done inadequately and improperly. Indeed the net result should have been that all the "vaccines" were TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE and EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. When AstraZeneca tested their vaccine on monkeys, they all died. A few countries even banned them, but there should have been a general and total ban.
3. Not a single "vaccine" was capable of producing genuine immunity, since not a single one had an actual attenuated virus. Which is why they are producing more infections after vaccinations. See the state of Vermont results.
4. The long-term effects of these injections were totally disregarded.
5. FULL DISCLOSURE has never been given to any person who took the jab. It would have meant explaining the harmful and lethal effects of each and every one of the many substances within those vaccines. This was a violation of the Nuremberg Code. Had full disclosure been given not a single person would have accepted the jab.
6. The actual number of "vaccines" deaths and disabilities has never been disclosed, and never will. Medical fraud was committed in assigning vaccine deaths to COVID deaths or some other factor, or simply suppressing the reports. And this continues daily. Also the only entities which are even counting the adverse effects are the USA and the EU. What about the rest of the world?
-
1
-
1
- Show all
But KNOWING ALL of the Points you think you've made, Millions are still getting Vaxxed.
Why?
Because just like EVERY VACCINE before us, we are at a less than HALF A SINGLE PERCENT [.5] DEATH RATE versus [99.5%] SURVIVAL RATE and that's saying EVERY death is VAX related [which we know is FALSE]!
With ALL of the Deaths You, Ed, Others post daily, IT'S NOT EVEN ADDING UP TO 1% of Total Deaths versus Survival Rate!
As a Doctor, you're happy its't been that SUCCESSFUL!!
I love 99.5% Guarantees!
Why?
Because just like EVERY VACCINE before us, we are at a less than HALF A SINGLE PERCENT [.5] DEATH RATE versus [99.5%] SURVIVAL RATE and that's saying EVERY death is VAX related [which we know is FALSE]!
With ALL of the Deaths You, Ed, Others post daily, IT'S NOT EVEN ADDING UP TO 1% of Total Deaths versus Survival Rate!
As a Doctor, you're happy its't been that SUCCESSFUL!!
I love 99.5% Guarantees!
Rose Berg
APCO Associates
Phone: 206.224.4340
Victor Zonana
IAVI
Phone: 212.655.0201, ext. 446
NEW YORK -- The International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) announced Wednesday that it has received a US$25 million grant, the largest charitable gift in the history of the AIDS pandemic, from the William H. Gates Foundation. IAVI will more than double its AIDS vaccine development efforts as a result.
"Bill and Melinda Gates' historic act of generosity will allow us to significantly accelerate the scientific effort," Seth Berkley, M.D., IAVI's president, said. "With 16,000 new HIV infections a day, 95% of them in developing countries where there is little access to treatment, we have no time to spare."
Wayne Koff, Ph.D., IAVI's vice president for research and development, said the five-year grant from the Gates Foundation will allow IAVI to begin work on up to three new vaccine candidates -- one this year, one in 2000, and a third, depending on cost and other variables, in 2001. "We are canvassing the globe for the best scientific opportunities," Koff said. IAVI is already funding the development of two promising vaccine approaches.
Berkley also announced that the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation has made a grant of $2 million to IAVI, bringing the Sloan Foundation's commitment to AIDS vaccines to $5 million. "Thanks to these and other far-sighted donors, we have now raised nearly $50 million, a meaningful down payment on the $350 to $500 million budget outlined in our Scientific Blueprint for AIDS Vaccine Development," Berkley added. The Scientific Blueprint lays out a detailed scientific strategy to develop an AIDS vaccine as quickly as possible.
Gates' Goal: "A World Without AIDS"
"Melinda and I want our children - and all children - to grow up in a world without AIDS," said Bill Gates, the founder of the William H. Gates Foundation and the founder and chairman of Microsoft Corp. "Vaccines are one of the most far-reaching and effective technologies of our time. A widely distributed vaccine can help make the goal of a world without AIDS a reality. Shortening the time it will take to find a vaccine can save millions of lives. We're proud to be supporting the heroic work of IAVI in this gift, " he added.
APCO Associates
Phone: 206.224.4340
Victor Zonana
IAVI
Phone: 212.655.0201, ext. 446
NEW YORK -- The International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) announced Wednesday that it has received a US$25 million grant, the largest charitable gift in the history of the AIDS pandemic, from the William H. Gates Foundation. IAVI will more than double its AIDS vaccine development efforts as a result.
"Bill and Melinda Gates' historic act of generosity will allow us to significantly accelerate the scientific effort," Seth Berkley, M.D., IAVI's president, said. "With 16,000 new HIV infections a day, 95% of them in developing countries where there is little access to treatment, we have no time to spare."
Wayne Koff, Ph.D., IAVI's vice president for research and development, said the five-year grant from the Gates Foundation will allow IAVI to begin work on up to three new vaccine candidates -- one this year, one in 2000, and a third, depending on cost and other variables, in 2001. "We are canvassing the globe for the best scientific opportunities," Koff said. IAVI is already funding the development of two promising vaccine approaches.
Berkley also announced that the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation has made a grant of $2 million to IAVI, bringing the Sloan Foundation's commitment to AIDS vaccines to $5 million. "Thanks to these and other far-sighted donors, we have now raised nearly $50 million, a meaningful down payment on the $350 to $500 million budget outlined in our Scientific Blueprint for AIDS Vaccine Development," Berkley added. The Scientific Blueprint lays out a detailed scientific strategy to develop an AIDS vaccine as quickly as possible.
Gates' Goal: "A World Without AIDS"
"Melinda and I want our children - and all children - to grow up in a world without AIDS," said Bill Gates, the founder of the William H. Gates Foundation and the founder and chairman of Microsoft Corp. "Vaccines are one of the most far-reaching and effective technologies of our time. A widely distributed vaccine can help make the goal of a world without AIDS a reality. Shortening the time it will take to find a vaccine can save millions of lives. We're proud to be supporting the heroic work of IAVI in this gift, " he added.
-
1
- Show all
I agree, not everyone will have good health or natural immunity. Surely from the perspective of charity, if we feel these vaccines are effective we should let those that have health problems and those that are impoverished have a first crack at the vaccine. Let's not be greedy and keep the vaccines for ourselves, surely all of our vaccines should go to 3rd world countries first. Only when the 3rd world countries have their fill should we look at our own interests. Should we not push this principle of charity on our politicians?
Since children are especially protected by virtue of their age, we should not let any of them get the shot until these poor 3rd world countries are given all of our vaccination materials. It might take a decade but we as charitable people can wait.
Since children are especially protected by virtue of their age, we should not let any of them get the shot until these poor 3rd world countries are given all of our vaccination materials. It might take a decade but we as charitable people can wait.
-
1
- Show all
- Status