Here's the thing. For me anyway. We think we have our construct - our theology I guess you would call it - all pounded into place, but it's all so huge, God's so huge, that we have a struggle with it because I see these endless debates and I carefully read them and I see truth in both sides usually, although sometimes, I just think both sides pick a vs to the exclusion of some other verses but no one ever fits them all together.
And if we keep doing it the same way, it's never going to come together. The definition of insanity, right? Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
So it is true that unbelievers can do right or good deeds at times. I gave the vs. When unbelievers do what is right, they prove that Gods laws are written on their hearts and their consciences either approve or disapprove them in what they do.
And yet, that is Gods doing still. They did not write those laws on their hearts and they did not place their conscience within themselves. So the good they are capable of is not from themselves.
Don't know where this puts us, but I DO clearly see some of the next part. Have to go to bed though so I'll be back in the morning after I see what God might say to me over coffee.
I really enjoy talking with you all. We will see some good things from this if we walk in love with each other and listen to the Spirit.
So the next part of what I see. (By the way, sydlit is okay, was just a little down and weary and forgetting for a time, like we all do, that this is all just temporary. And it doesn't help to come in here in our weariness, looking for some help and encouragement and only find everyone devouring each other and tearing down instead of building up of our faith by and for each other.)
There is a way that we are told that we can tell false teachers from good and it is NOT by examining their doctrine with a nit comb and useless argument over words. It is by their fruit. So we are quite able to see one another's fruit. We KNOW what the fruit of one who is walking by the Spirit is and we do none of us, ourselves included, any favors by putting our stamp of approval on someone for what we deem to be correct doctrine if we can plainly see them presenting their teaching with anger, cursing instead of blessing, arrogance, reviling back when reviled, demanding of apologies rather than forgiveness, name calling, belittling, and so on.
The test of a man we want to listen to and talk with (which doesn't mean his understanding is full and that he doesn't see some things through a glass darkly, as we all do, and that he is perfect in knowledge) is not doctrine. It is the fruits that show he has been with our Lord. Patience, humility, a meekness that doesn't revile and accuse, and love above all. He doesn't get angry and belittle when disagreed with. You don't hear these words from his mouth when he is speaking of his brothers and sisters: stupid, fool, liar for Satan, unsaved, headed for hell, and so on. You see joy, not anger and reviling.
So we can see the fruit of having been with our Lord and having learned from the Holy Spirit instead of men.
I am certain we all agree on this. Doctrine is not the test of our brothers and sisters in Christ. Their fruit is. Do we agree with this first part?