This example is not applicable because it would assume that you said water is ALL WE NEED to be healthy. Yet the Bible tells us that all scripture is all we need for our doctrine and to be "perfect."
The Bible says no such thing. Sola Scriptura is a presumption that is applied to the Bible without any support in Scripture itself or the 1500 years of Christian history that went before it.
Additionally the verse goes on to say it is the instruction for ALL GOOD WORKS. That means there is no good thing we can do absent the Bible. This completely refutes any man-made doctrine from any denomination or cult.
That is most certainly not what the text says at all. I see no where the words "without the Bible we can do nothing good", and if what you said was true it would damn every single Christian that could not read, including all the Christians before at least 1720 when literacy was growing.
And again, any group that is worshiping the dead is not practicing Biblical Christianity:
Except we don't worship the dead, we venerate them. For example The use of the bones of Elisha brought a dead man to life: "So Elisha died, and they buried him. Now bands of Moabites used to invade the land in the spring of the year. And as a man was being buried, lo, a marauding band was seen and the man was cast into the grave of Elisha; and as soon as the man touched the bones of Elisha, he revived, and stood on his feet" (2 Kgs. 13:20-21). This is an unequivocal biblical example of a miracle being performed by God through contact with the relics of a saint!
Similar are the cases of the woman cured of a hemorrhage by touching the hem of Christ’s cloak (Matt. 9:20-22) and the sick who were healed when Peter’s shadow passed over them (Acts 5:14-16). "And God did extraordinary miracles by the hands of Paul, so that handkerchiefs or aprons were carried away from his body to the sick, and diseases left them and the evil spirits came out of them" (Acts 19:11-12).
If these aren’t examples of the use of relics, what are? In the case of Elisha, a Lazarus-like return from the dead was brought about through the prophet’s bones. In the New Testament cases, physical things (the cloak, the shadow, handkerchiefs and aprons) were used to effect cures. There is a perfect congruity between present-day Catholic practice and ancient practice. If you reject all Catholic relics today as frauds, you should also reject these biblical accounts as frauds.
Full article at:
http://www.catholic.com/tracts/relics
This is not Biblical either.
It's the exposition of the Eucharist, the very Body and Blood of Christ.
These heresies are leading people into spiritual confusion and idolatry. I say this not because I have an issue with the RC church or want to start an argument. I just want to warn people in compassion for their souls. The above photos are precisely why we can only rely on THE BIBLE for our doctrine and guidance. The Word of God and not the word of men.
They're not heresies, they are the historic practice of the Christian faith. Catholicism was not created like whatever church you may attend, it is a continuation of the same Christians who Paul and Peter addressed and worked among, and a continuation of the Apostles and their teaching. But regardless of if you wanted an argument or not you got one, just like my staunchly Catholic ancestors that fought in the 30 Years War, I'll defend the faith, but with words instead of a sword.