Bad hermeneutics to make a doctrine out of one Scripture verse - Psalm 51:5
Studied this in Hebrew this year, and it comes out a bit differently - and certainly not enough evidence to make a doctrine out of. That being said, I am willing to be convinced there is original sin, as I have been taught all my life.
Although personally, I don't really care if there is Original Sin or not. We all sin and fall short of the glory of God. We all need Jesus Christ as a Saviour. Whether it started at the Fall, or early in our lifetimes. So Original Sin is probably not a necessary belief to be a Christian.
Studied this in Hebrew this year, and it comes out a bit differently - and certainly not enough evidence to make a doctrine out of. That being said, I am willing to be convinced there is original sin, as I have been taught all my life.
Although personally, I don't really care if there is Original Sin or not. We all sin and fall short of the glory of God. We all need Jesus Christ as a Saviour. Whether it started at the Fall, or early in our lifetimes. So Original Sin is probably not a necessary belief to be a Christian.
Hi Angela,
The hermeneutic is not from one scripture, I thought you may have noticed that by reading my post?
Yes there are many Hebrew 'Scholars' who would disagree with you.
You see in order to believe you can earn your salvation requires there to be no original sin, original sin does not mean that you have sinned as soon as you are born.. I am sure most seminarys would atleast teach that?
Last edited: