Why are you trying to change the plain meaning of Scripture to fit your eschatology? Everyone here is claiming that all this has been fulfilled. But since the reign of the Antichrist is in the future, that totally refutes this idea.
Following the reign of the Antichrist will be the eternal reign of Christ, when everlasting righteousness will LITERALLY be established on earth. A righteous earth free from sin and evil. That is what this prophecy is all about. A righteous Jerusalem, a righteous Israel, and a righteous earth. An end of sins. An end of transgressions. An end to iniquity. Since none of this has happened let's move away from fantasy.
Following the reign of the Antichrist will be the eternal reign of Christ, when everlasting righteousness will LITERALLY be established on earth. A righteous earth free from sin and evil. That is what this prophecy is all about. A righteous Jerusalem, a righteous Israel, and a righteous earth. An end of sins. An end of transgressions. An end to iniquity. Since none of this has happened let's move away from fantasy.
If we add a gap, a 2000 year gap the text loses all its meaning and prophecy is broken. Because then it wasn't 70 weeks of Daniel, it was way more than that.
Any false prophet could do that today, Jesus will return in 3 years, 3 years go by, well you know, its still three years its still going we are in the invisible gap.
- 2
- Show all