why does this verse say chidlren are plunder?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
#41
FreeGrace2 said:
This verse is about fellowship with the Lord in order to bear fruit. iow, a believer cannot bear fruit for the Lord unless he/she is in fellowship with the Lord.
All believers are in fellowship with the Lord.
Explain WHY Paul admonishes believers to stop GRIEVING the Holy Spirit and to stop QUENCHING the Holy Spirit.

You have confused fellowship for relationship. They are not the same.

Perfect example: marriage. In God's economy, marriage is PERMANENT. However, within that relationship, the husband and wife may be in fellowship with each other or at one another's throats. I hope you can see the point.

Is there fellowship in a loveless marriage? No.

Relationship is permanent. Fellowship is dynamic. It is lost when one spouse offends the other. It is restored when the offending spouse confesses their error to their spouse. 1 john 1:9 tells the believer how to restore fellowship with the Lord.

The verse next chapter shows this clearly:

John 17:20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;
John 17:21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.
Believing isn't fellowship. Believing results in relationship.

This is fellowship through belief.
No it's not. You need to explain WHY Paul admonishes believers to stop grieving/quenching the Spirit. There is NO WAY a believer can be in fellowship with the Lord while at the same time grieving/quenching the Spirit.

As Biden would put it, C'mon, man.

Believers are in fellowship. When Jesus talked about chopping branches off and burning them He was talking about people who don’t abide in Him, aka non-believers.
This could not be more wrong. You really have no idea about these deeper doctrines.

In a sense married people have become one flesh and are not disunited except by death or adultery.
And that is...relationship. A permanent relationship.

But, just go try to offend your spouse and see how much fellowship you will experience.

Maybe you’re referring to positional fellowship.
I differentiate between fellowship and relationship. And marriage is the perfect example of each.

People are forgiven by the work of Christ, but in another sense can create “relationship problem by sinning. This isn’t the same thing as being dispensed as you seem to be suggesting.
It is EXACTLY the same thing. Sin OFFENDS the Lord and God the Father. And fellowship is LOST. How did the father describe his idiot son? "He was LOST...he was dead". But the son knew exactly where he was and where is father was. And he didn't die.

So Jesus was teaching about fellowship. When the idiot son left, he left out of fellowship. While our western minds have no clue about this parable, 1st Century Jews sure did. For a son to ask for his "cut" of the inheritance while the father was still alive was akin to telling the father that he wished dear old dad was DEAD. It was a HUGE insult and offense to the father. Just ask anyone who is an expert in 1st Century Jewish culture, customs, etc.

God’s children can sin, but being forgiven effectually makes them sinless.
You really have no understanding of any of this, obviously. When God's children sin, they LOSE fellowship with the Father.

Aren't you aware of this verse? Psa 66:18 - If I had regarded sin in my heart, the Lord would not have listened;

Does that sound like fellowship to you? He ISN'T LISTENING when you pray. That's why the Bible tells us to confess our sins. So we will be cleansed/purified. Which restores fellowship.

If your sins aren’t counted against you are you still a sinner?
YES. Haven't you read Romans 7 and Paul' present stuggle with his own sin? Then read 1 John 1:8,10.

I said:
"Now explain WHY God would scourge (skin alive with a whip) EVERY son? What would be the reason, other than SIN?"
That’s what the Bible says. I’m surprised you think it’s literal.
Seriously? It is a figure of speech describing God's discipline as PAINFUL. Now take a peek at Heb 12:11.

I used the word disposable. I think it’s accurate.
I think it is very inaccurate.

I don’t think something that is discarded needs to be trash.
When someone hears the word "disposable", most liekly the first thing they think of is trash.

It just needs to have no use.
You don't understand. When God disciplines one of his sinning children, and their pain is seen, it is a teaching moment at least for the one who sees it. It should be a teaching moment for the sinner.

People are valuable, but that isn’t the same thing as being worthless garbage. I don’t think we speak the same language.
We certainly don't. I use biblical words and concepts.

People don’t die then live forever.
The Bible clearly teaches that everyone will physically die ONCE. Heb 9:27 But everyone's soul will live forever. The saved souls will have a resurrection body, glorified, immortal, and imperishable. All these words are biblical.

Unsaved will get their old carcass back for the GWT judgment and then cast into the lake of fire, where their old carcass DIES physically AGAIN. Which is why the lake of fire is also called the "second death".

John 3:16 promises eternal life to those who believe and death to those who don’t believe. Perish means death.
Yep. The unsaved will be cast into the lake of fire in their resurrected old carcass, just to DIE again.

No one is "destroyed" in the permanent sense. Annihilation isn't taught in the Bible.
Annihilation is Biblical.[/QUOTE]
Then you should cut Rev 20:10 out of your Bible, because it REFUTES you totally. In fact, it ANNIHILATES your view.

But what sense is the love?
I don't understand your question.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
#43
that would be the L of TULIP ;)
Correct. How come no Calvinist can quote a verse that shows that Jesus didn't die for everyone, or that He died ONLY FOR some?

Rather, many verses very plainly say that He died for everyone.
 

Melach

Well-known member
Mar 28, 2019
2,057
1,526
113
#44
Correct. How come no Calvinist can quote a verse that shows that Jesus didn't die for everyone, or that He died ONLY FOR some?

Rather, many verses very plainly say that He died for everyone.
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/erik-raymond/jesus-die-everyone/
https://www.gotquestions.org/limited-atonement.html

mark 10:45 For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.

matthew 26:28
This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.

isaiah 53:12 ".....yet he bore the sin of many, ".

the word many is also used. but there is a few links for more info.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
#45
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/erik-raymond/jesus-die-everyone/
https://www.gotquestions.org/limited-atonement.html

mark 10:45 For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.
Do you really this verse means "less than everyone", or "less than all"??

matthew 26:28
This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
Ditto here as well.

isaiah 53:12 ".....yet he bore the sin of many, ".
Ditto also. Getting kinda boring.

the word many is also used. but there is a few links for more info.
Got news for you. In the Greek, "many" means "the masses".

Here are some verses for your reading pleasure:
For whom did Jesus come to save? The sick, the lost, the poor, the unrighteous, the ungodly, and sinners.

Matt 9:12 On hearing this, Jesus said, it is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. Are just the elect “sick”?

Luke 19:10 For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost. Are just the elect “lost”?

Luke 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He has anointed Me to preach good news to the poor. Are just the elect poor?

1 Peter 3:18 For Christ died for sins once FOR ALL, the righteous (Christ) for the unrighteous (humanity, all of them), to bring you to God. Are just the elect unrighteous?

Rom 5:6 You see, just at the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. Are just the elect ungodly?

Mark 2:17 On hearing this, Jesus said to them, it is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners. Are just the elect sinners?

Isa 61:1 The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;

The entire human race is described as sick, lost, poor, unrighteous, ungodly, and sinners. Every single one of us.

If Christ died for just the elect, then reformed theology leads to universalism, because of these verses. That means the non elect are neither sick, lost, poor, unrighteous, ungodly, or sinners. So they don’t need salvation. And Christ wouldn’t need to die for any of them.

Your turn.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,165
1,795
113
#46
ok. Obviously you can believe what you like.
But the evidence is that God allowed the women and children of other idol worshipping heathen to be spared.
The seven nations of Canaan were to be wiped out. Amalekites were to be wiped out. There were some Nephilim in the promised land at certain points in time but it doesn't say the seven nations or Amalek were to be wiped out because of the Nephilim.

Even amongst supposedly pure human groups, we see that some of them were Nephilim.

Here we see David trying to weed out the impure "humans". These are the Moabites, from which King David's grandmother came!

2 Samuel 8:2

New King James Version

2 Then he defeated Moab. Forcing them down to the ground, he measured them off with a line. With two lines he measured off those to be put to death, and with one full line those to be kept alive. So the Moabites became David’s servants, and brought tribute.


David recognized that one of the traits of the Nephilim was unnatural size.
Are you trying to interpret this to mean he killed the tall ones, because he 'measured'? I don't see how you get that form what is written in the verse.

Here is a quote from Ellicot's commentary on the passage from https://biblehub.com/commentaries/2_samuel/8-2.htm:

"With two lines.—This expression with the “one full line” of the next clause is equivalent to saying that David measured off the bodies of his prostrate enemies with a line divided into three equal parts. When they had been made to lie down upon the ground, side by side, the line was stretched over them. Such as were found under the two first parts of it were put to death, those under the third part were spared, thus two-thirds of all the Moabite men perished. There is no mention of this in 1Chronicles 18:2."
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,614
9,127
113
#47
PRESIDENTE:
"Are you trying to interpret this to mean he killed the tall ones, because he 'measured'? I don't see how you get that form what is written in the verse."



Yes. As well as other commentators.
Commentators like Ellicot are just that. Commentators. Their words carry no special value over others.


I think you are suggesting David doesn't know how to count to 3.

The lines are for MEASURING.
If you wanted to kill 2/3rds of the people, you would simply kill 2 out of every 3 people.

You might make them all lie down, but there would be no need to measure them.

In fact, unless you are measuring them INDIVIDUALLY, the lengths of measuring lines would serve no purpose.
But as I've said, you are obviously free to believe whatever you like.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,165
1,795
113
#48
the same people who say this will also condemn a country like russia today. why? because "that was back then" which is a bad argument. these nations were far from israel so "offer of peace" means "we take your land for free" lol. one of the most islamic tricks in the playbook. but i guess thats where mohammad copied his method from?
I don't know that Israel was supposed to expand their land beyond it's borders.