Will The Actual Calvinists Here Please Stand Up?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

I Am An Actual Calvinist

  • Yes

    Votes: 5 20.8%
  • No

    Votes: 19 79.2%

  • Total voters
    24
Oct 19, 2024
4,144
920
113
Two factors preclude human autonomy. Our bondage to sin. And God's absolute Dominion and Sovereignty.

I think these passages lead to that understanding.
Isaiah 46:9-11, Daniel 4:35, Proverbs 16:4, Psalm 33:10-11, Ephesians 1:11, Romans 8:28. Just a few.
So what is your understanding of DT 30:19, MT 23:37, etc. in light of those passages? How do you harmonize them all?
 

Hakawaka

Well-known member
Jul 1, 2021
476
281
63
So your definition would totally be my take on Calvinism. Although I have close friends that believe part or all of TULIP, there are things I can't get past. I totally would agree with your view of Calvinism.
Yup thats the logical conclusion. I know they will protest, but in their own confessions of faith this truth is laid out. Let me show you the double speak in one calvinist confession of faith [1689 baptist confession]:


On the view of Free Will, ch IX, the confession states:

"III. Man, by his fall into a state of sin, hath wholly lost all ability of will to any spiritual good accompanying salvation; so as a natural man, being altogether averse from that good, and dead in sin, is not able, by his own strength, to convert himself, or to prepare himself thereunto."

And then in ch III of Eternal Decrees the Confession reads,

"III. By the decree of God, for the manifestation of his glory, some men and angels are predestinated unto everlasting life, and others foreordained to everlasting death."

Now here's where the conflict arises!

Although the Confession says very little about prophecy (which is no surprise since Calvin avoided Revelation and was amillennial), it offers this statement in ch XXXIII,

" III. As Christ would have us to be certainly persuaded that there shall be a day of judgment, both to deter all men from sin, and for the greater consolation of the godly in their adversity: so will he have that day unknown to men, that they may shake off all carnal security, and be always watchful, because they know not at what hour the Lord will come; and may be ever prepared to say, Come, Lord Jesus, come quickly. Amen."

Get that! to "DETER ALL MEN FROM SIN". If man is totally unable to respond or perceive the gospel, then how can he be DETERRED? If man is predestined for hell and eternal punishment, then are not the Calvinist being disobedient against God's "eternal decree" in trying to convince a man against God's will to DETER him from sin?

If a man is foreordained to hell, then he can not be deterred.
This is a fatal flaw of logic within the Confession against its own system, and is to be expected when man dictates human reasoning above the Bible.
 
Oct 19, 2024
4,144
920
113
Yup thats the logical conclusion. I know they will protest, but in their own confessions of faith this truth is laid out. Let me show you the double speak in one calvinist confession of faith [1689 baptist confession]:


On the view of Free Will, ch IX, the confession states:

"III. Man, by his fall into a state of sin, hath wholly lost all ability of will to any spiritual good accompanying salvation; so as a natural man, being altogether averse from that good, and dead in sin, is not able, by his own strength, to convert himself, or to prepare himself thereunto."

And then in ch III of Eternal Decrees the Confession reads,

"III. By the decree of God, for the manifestation of his glory, some men and angels are predestinated unto everlasting life, and others foreordained to everlasting death."

Now here's where the conflict arises!

Although the Confession says very little about prophecy (which is no surprise since Calvin avoided Revelation and was amillennial), it offers this statement in ch XXXIII,

" III. As Christ would have us to be certainly persuaded that there shall be a day of judgment, both to deter all men from sin, and for the greater consolation of the godly in their adversity: so will he have that day unknown to men, that they may shake off all carnal security, and be always watchful, because they know not at what hour the Lord will come; and may be ever prepared to say, Come, Lord Jesus, come quickly. Amen."

Get that! to "DETER ALL MEN FROM SIN". If man is totally unable to respond or perceive the gospel, then how can he be DETERRED? If man is predestined for hell and eternal punishment, then are not the Calvinist being disobedient against God's "eternal decree" in trying to convince a man against God's will to DETER him from sin?

If a man is foreordained to hell, then he can not be deterred.
This is a fatal flaw of logic within the Confession against its own system, and is to be expected when man dictates human reasoning above the Bible.
Yes, the TULIPists do not think very logically in their implicit denial of divine omnilove.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
21,550
7,361
113
63
Yup thats the logical conclusion. I know they will protest, but in their own confessions of faith this truth is laid out. Let me show you the double speak in one calvinist confession of faith [1689 baptist confession]:


On the view of Free Will, ch IX, the confession states:

"III. Man, by his fall into a state of sin, hath wholly lost all ability of will to any spiritual good accompanying salvation; so as a natural man, being altogether averse from that good, and dead in sin, is not able, by his own strength, to convert himself, or to prepare himself thereunto."

And then in ch III of Eternal Decrees the Confession reads,

"III. By the decree of God, for the manifestation of his glory, some men and angels are predestinated unto everlasting life, and others foreordained to everlasting death."

Now here's where the conflict arises!

Although the Confession says very little about prophecy (which is no surprise since Calvin avoided Revelation and was amillennial), it offers this statement in ch XXXIII,

" III. As Christ would have us to be certainly persuaded that there shall be a day of judgment, both to deter all men from sin, and for the greater consolation of the godly in their adversity: so will he have that day unknown to men, that they may shake off all carnal security, and be always watchful, because they know not at what hour the Lord will come; and may be ever prepared to say, Come, Lord Jesus, come quickly. Amen."

Get that! to "DETER ALL MEN FROM SIN". If man is totally unable to respond or perceive the gospel, then how can he be DETERRED? If man is predestined for hell and eternal punishment, then are not the Calvinist being disobedient against God's "eternal decree" in trying to convince a man against God's will to DETER him from sin?

If a man is foreordained to hell, then he can not be deterred.
This is a fatal flaw of logic within the Confession against its own system, and is to be expected when man dictates human reasoning above the Bible.
Can parents, through the threat of punishment, deter children from sinning?
 
Feb 15, 2025
726
357
63
Is repenting of your murders part of accepting God's grace and salvation?
Yes.

For example, justifying your murders by claiming that you could not help but do whatever you willed because it wasn't God's will that you didn't is just a patronization of God's will.
I think you would have to ask whomever said that.
 
Jan 17, 2023
5,501
2,447
113
Jesus said "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!"

He did not say " you could not". That means they chose not to believe. Of course the first statement is true, not the second.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
21,550
7,361
113
63
Of course the answer is yes.
If you go back to post #143, my question was in response to a statement that said someone predestined to hell could not be deterred. While I don't believe anyone is predestined to hell, sinners can be deterred from sin through consequences, whether they are saved or not. My question was asked to show this reality.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
21,550
7,361
113
63
Maybe they can. But are humans very deterred from sinning?
The threat of negative consequences has always had the effect of deterring undesired actions. While it doesn't always in every particular case, on the whole it does.
The ineffectiveness such an approach is that merely getting someone to refrain from a behavior doesn't alter an individual's desire to perform the behavior. To alter the desire or will of an individual would require that the heart and the mind be altered. This is the essence of salvation.