Working out our Salvation

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
#81
Instead of man having the accountability, responsibility to act himself, that accountability/responsibility is all thrown upon God to move men. But then men become lost due to God's failure in moving men whereby God has culpability for the lost. And since men supposedly have no accountability/responsibility, they but are just innocent pawns randomly moved about or left alone by God.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#82
Instead of man having the accountability, responsibility to act himself, that
accountability/responsibility is all thrown upon God to move men. But then men become lost due to God's failure in moving men whereby God has culpability for the lost. And since men supposedly have no accountability/responsibility, they but are just innocent pawns randomly moved about or left alone by God.
Your view of accountability/responsibility has the same dilemma in several Biblical truths.

Jesus held the present generation responsible (ekzeteo--"blood required," Lev 17:4, 20:9,11-13,16,27)
for the blood of all the prophets that had been shed since the beginning of the world (Lk 11:50).

God holds each man guilty of Adam's sin (Ro 5:12-21).

When God creates men knowing they will choose hell, he is responsible for creating men for hell.

You view makes God accountable in all of these.
 
Last edited:

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#83
Instead of man having the accountability, responsibility to act himself, that accountability/responsibility is all thrown upon God to move men. But then men become lost due to God's failure in moving men whereby God has culpability for the lost. And since men supposedly have no accountability/responsibility, they but are just innocent pawns randomly moved about or left alone by God.
God lights every soul that comes into the world. Not every soul responds to the Light but turns again to the darkness.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#84
Sure being born again is a choice of mine, if it wasn't then you have someone else choosing for me if I will be saved or not.

Jn 1:13

"not of blood" means physical birth does not make one born of God

"not of the
will of the flesh" means one cannot earn/merit the new birth"

"not of the
will of man" the new birth did not come about because it was man's idea that was put into action

"children born not of blood"
"children born not of the will of the flesh"
"But children born of God"

Correct, it was God's
will they be born again "that was put into action."

 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#85
You have the impossibility of one being saved BEFORE he even has faith.
Not only the possibility, but the necessity.

That is what the new birth (born of God) is, the ability to believe.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
#86
God lights every soul that comes into the world. Not every soul responds to the Light but turns again to the darkness.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
Amen and God has dealt to every man a measure of faith (the ability to believe)
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#87
Elin said:
SeaBass said:
I do have a part in having faith which is necessary to accessing grace.
Only when you have a part in your own rebirth of your spirit by the Holy Spirit,
which produces the gift of saving faith (Php 1:29: Ac 18:27; 2Pe 1:1).
You have the impossibility of one being saved BEFORE he even has faith.
Not only the possibility, but the necessity.

That is what the new birth (born of God) is, the ability to believe.
 
Last edited:
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
#88

"children born not of blood"
"children born not of the will of the flesh"
"But children born of God"

Correct, it was God's
will they be born again "that was put into action."

Amen and that word will (thelema) means...Determination, choice, desire, purpose, decree and or inclination...

Apply that to the flesh statement and it becomes all to clear that we had nothing to do with it....!
 
F

forsha

Guest
#89
Instead of man having the accountability, responsibility to act himself, that accountability/responsibility is all thrown upon God to move men. But then men become lost due to God's failure in moving men whereby God has culpability for the lost. And since men supposedly have no accountability/responsibility, they but are just innocent pawns randomly moved about or left alone by God.
God fails in nothing! Dan 4:35, All the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing; and he doeth ACCORDING TO HIS WILL in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth; and NONE CAN STAY HIS HAND, (not even ourselves)or say unto him, What doest thou?
 
F

forsha

Guest
#90
Each persons own salvation..its primarily a personal walk..as Jesus said to Peter...never mind what I do with others , you follow me...only one salvation..only one way..acts 2v38 etc....through Jesus Christ....fear is also used as respect !..remember once a christian (a real one !!!) born again new start ..bought with a price..you are his child now..he will chasten if you err to much..those I love I chasten and rebuke..
God only chastens those that he loves, not all mankind. Psalm 73:5, They are not in trouble as other men; neither are they plagued (chastened) like other men. God does not love all mankind, the account of Jacob and Easue bears this out. Acts 2:38, these men were already born of the Spirit, otherwise they would not have been able to discern spiritual things, 1 Cor 2:14.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
#91
God fails in nothing! Dan 4:35, All the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing; and he doeth ACCORDING TO HIS WILL in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth; and NONE CAN STAY HIS HAND, (not even ourselves)or say unto him, What doest thou?

If God must "move" men for men to be saved and that is the ONLY way man can be saved is by God "moving" him' then it it God's fault, failure for those that remain 'unmoved". Your Calvinism has removed all accountability, responsibility away from man putting it all upon God.

There is nothing in Dan 4:35 that says God violates man's freewill or that man has no responsibility accountability on his part.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
#92
Not only the possibility, but the necessity.

That is what the new birth (born of God) is, the ability to believe.

If a man can be saved without faith, then there is no reason for him to ever have faith.

Your Calvinistic theology has you rewriting the bible, reversing verses:

Rom 5:2 "By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God."

One must have faith to have access to grace. You reverse this by saying man somehow has access to grace then can have faith later.

Jn 3:16 "
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

You reverse this by saying one somehow first has everlasting life then should believe.

Jn 6:35 "
And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst."

You reverse this by having one for some reason to first never thirsting, then believes.

Jn 6:47 "
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life."

You have one first having everlasting life then believe.

I can post a host of more verses that put faith/belief BEFORE salvation show that Calvinism is in total opposition to biblical teachings.




 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
#93
Your view of accountability/responsibility has the same dilemma in several Biblical truths.

Jesus held the present generation responsible (ekzeteo--"blood required," Lev 17:4, 20:9,11-13,16,27)
for the blood of all the prophets that had been shed since the beginning of the world (Lk 11:50).

God holds each man guilty of Adam's sin (Ro 5:12-21).

When God creates men knowing they will choose hell, he is responsible for creating men for hell.

You view makes God accountable in all of these.
ROm 5:12-21 does not say one man is accountable for the sin of another man. Men suffer the consequence of Adam sinning but are not accountable.
"Yet say ye, Why? doth not the son bear the iniquity of the father? When the son hath done that which is lawful and right, and hath kept all my statutes, and hath done them, he shall surely live.The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him." Men are accountable for their own sins and not another person's sins.

Secondly, God created man giving man freewill but that does not make God accountable for the way man abuses that freewill. If parents teach their child morality, teaches him right from wrong yet that child grows up to be a criminal are the parent then responsible, accountable for their son's actions? No.

Rom 9:22 if God force some men by fitting them to be vessels of wrath and men have no choice in the matter then God is at fault for those men being the vessels GOD MADE them to be. And if God forced them to be vessels of wrath, then why would God be longsuffering they be saved when God already predetermined them to be lost? Calvinism creates contradiction within the character of God.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
#94

"children born not of blood"
"children born not of the will of the flesh"
"But children born of God"

Correct, it was God's
will they be born again "that was put into action."


Jn 1:12 "But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:"

Belief only does not make one a child of God but gives one the right TO BECOME a son of God. To be born of God one must be water baptized > the new birth, Jn 3:5, 1 Cor 12:13; Tts 3:5.

Jn 1:13 "
Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God."

Verse 13 is saying this new birth comes by God, NOT by the physical birth, NOT by works of merit, NOT by any man but it is of God. Therefore those that believe and have the right to BECOME a son of God exercises that right by obedience to the gospel in submitting to water baptism thereby being born again of God. There verse does NOT say only those that God wills can be born of God, you are reading that idea into the text, Why would Jesus say to Nicodemus he MUST be born again if God willed Nicodemus not be born again? The "must" Jesus used in Jn 3:7 implies man must choose to be born again of God or not by choosing to submit to water baptism or not. No one is exempt from being born again if he wishes to enter the kingdom of heaven. "
Jesus answered and said to him, 'Verily, verily, I say to thee, If any one may not be born from above, he is not able to see the reign of God;'" Again, the new birth is of God (from above), Jn 1:13 and is not of men, not of the physical birth nor of works of merit.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#95
Elin said:
SeaBass said:
I do have a part in having faith which is necessary to accessing grace.
Only when you have a part in your own rebirth of your spirit by the Holy Spirit,
which produces the gift of saving faith (Php 1:29: Ac 18:27; 2Pe 1:1).
You have the impossibility of one being saved BEFORE he even has faith.
Read it again, that's not what it says.

If a man can be saved without faith, then there is no reason for him to ever have faith.
Agreed. . .

Rom 5:2 "By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God."

One must have faith to have access to grace.
Agreed. . .one must have faith to have access to the grace of forgiveness of sin, which is salvation (Lk 1:77).
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#96
Elin said:
In Lk 11:50, Jesus held the present generation responsible (ekzeteo--"blood required,"
Lev 17:4, 20:9,11-13,16,27) for the blood of all the prophets that had been shed since the beginning of the world
.
ROm 5:12-21 does not say one man is accountable for the sin of another man. Men suffer the consequence of Adam sinning but are not accountable.
You haven't dealt with Lk 11:50.

Ro 5:12-21 presents the same principle as Lk 11:50, accountability for another's sin.
God held Jesus accountable for my sin.
 
F

forsha

Guest
#97
If God must "move" men for men to be saved and that is the ONLY way man can be saved is by God "moving" him' then it it God's fault, failure for those that remain 'unmoved". Your Calvinism has removed all accountability, responsibility away from man putting it all upon God.

There is nothing in Dan 4:35 that says God violates man's freewill or that man has no responsibility accountability on his part.
It would be nice if you would give your interpretation of Dan 4:35. I do believe that God has given man a free will to chose things he does here in this world, but God does not give a man a free will when it comes to his eternal salvation because if God did, then the carnal man would never make a choice to do anything pertaining to the Spirit, 1 Cor 2:14.
 
F

forsha

Guest
#98
God lights every soul that comes into the world. Not every soul responds to the Light but turns again to the darkness.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
It would be nice if you would throw a little scripture in to back up your statements.
 
F

forsha

Guest
#99
If God must "move" men for men to be saved and that is the ONLY way man can be saved is by God "moving" him' then it it God's fault, failure for those that remain 'unmoved". Your Calvinism has removed all accountability, responsibility away from man putting it all upon God.

There is nothing in Dan 4:35 that says God violates man's freewill or that man has no responsibility accountability on his part.
You could use the same reasoning if God wants all mankind to be saved eternally and he doesn't accomplish his will, then it is God's fault, right?
 
F

forsha

Guest
If a man can be saved without faith, then there is no reason for him to ever have faith.

Your Calvinistic theology has you rewriting the bible, reversing verses:

Rom 5:2 "By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God."

One must have faith to have access to grace. You reverse this by saying man somehow has access to grace then can have faith later.

Jn 3:16 "
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

You reverse this by saying one somehow first has everlasting life then should believe.

Jn 6:35 "
And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst."

You reverse this by having one for some reason to first never thirsting, then believes.

Jn 6:47 "
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life."

You have one first having everlasting life then believe.

I can post a host of more verses that put faith/belief BEFORE salvation show that Calvinism is in total opposition to biblical teachings.




You can do all that and still can't explain Dan 4:35?