Would you sacrifice your child if God asked you to?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

Simeon

Guest
#81
So the trust (faith) we have that Jesus' Sacrifice was sufficient is enough to KNOW that a request given such as killing your child would not be from God, but from the evil one.

.

but my question is : how can trust ( faith) equate with knowledge?
 
S

Simeon

Guest
#82
Unless one is saved they are carnal and as such they can not understand the spiritual. It takes faith. God owes you no proof. He has made a way for us to be saved but it is up to each of us to trust Him.
so you are saying there are no proofs of god, is that right? that's what i'm trying to find out. if there are no proofs, only faith, then how do we determine if we are correct or not? maybe the muslim is correct, maybe the hindoo, maybe the mormon... is it all a matter of taste and opinion? isn't truth objective? doesn't knowledge require justification?
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,034
8,717
113
#83
My apologies for not notating the Scripture reference I posted. It is proverbs 3:5.
Great verses you posted! Not sure if they have a bearing on what I said.

The world says "show me and I'll believe" God says "believe and I will show you".

You are a man. Your brain weighs about 3 lbs. How can you POSSIBLY expect to understand all the motives and plans OF THE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE? Especially by leaning on YOUR understanding?

Let the Peace of our Lord and savior reign in your heart and trust in Him alone, and He will reveal Himself through His word, and other ways to you.
 
T

TonyJay

Guest
#84
The authorship of the Gospels is far from clear. I think it is far from unanimously accepted by biblical scholars that the apostles actually did write the gospels themselves, in fact the gospels were written decades after the events so it seems extremely unlikely they were written by actual eyewitnesses with any kind of accuracy, to say the least. I had a friend who was undergoing seminary training and he explained to me some of the stuff they learn there and that he was struggling with, honnestly, I was shocked as well. It is far from certain that we know what Jesus actually said and did and that is what they teach wannabe preachers because there is no way around it. If you are not aware of it, just ask your pastor.

So in fact she is right, everyone have their own Jesus. And that is what I'm struggling with. We can't be sure what God wants or expect of us. If you are saying you can, I'd like you to explain to me how. The bible by itself is not clear enough and reliable enough, it is too open to interpretation, as this thread shows clearly. How many contradictory responses did I get for my simple question about such a morally important subject? And there are many other subjects upon which there is no definitive answer. That is a problem to me. And it goes further than just christianity, if the truth is availaible and obvious, then why isn't everybody on this planet a christian? Why muslims and hindous and whatnots? it doesn't make sense. it is extremely confusing. I don't want to just believe whatever people tell me, i want to know.
What is there to be shocked about.
The actual authorship of many (most!) of the books in the canon is not known.
It is true that at some time in history books were attributed to various authors that may or may not accurately reflect their true authorship.
There is no deep, dark secret here and no conspiracy.

The Book of Hebrews has traditionally been attributed to Paul, but this is almost certainly incorrect since the style of prose and vocabulary is so different from any of the other Pauline epistles.
Most of the Gospels have had their authorship challenged at one time or another - at this point in time it seems that we may never unequivocally know who wrote them.
The situation only gets messier in the OT.

It does not change my regard for Scripture one bit.
 

FlSnookman7

Senior Member
Jun 27, 2015
1,125
135
63
#85
so you are saying there are no proofs of god, is that right? that's what i'm trying to find out. if there are no proofs, only faith, then how do we determine if we are correct or not? maybe the muslim is correct, maybe the hindoo, maybe the mormon... is it all a matter of taste and opinion? isn't truth objective? doesn't knowledge require justification?
You should read The Case For Christ by Lee Strobel. It is a factual look at scripture. I have all the proof I need as I know Jesus.
 
S

Simeon

Guest
#86
What is there to be shocked about.
The actual authorship of many (most!) of the books in the canon is not known.
It is true that at some time in history books were attributed to various authors that may or may not accurately reflect their true authorship.
There is no deep, dark secret here and no conspiracy.

The Book of Hebrews has traditionally been attributed to Paul, but this is almost certainly incorrect since the style of prose and vocabulary is so different from any of the other Pauline epistles.
Most of the Gospels have had their authorship challenged at one time or another - at this point in time it seems that we may never unequivocally know who wrote them.
The situation only gets messier in the OT.

It does not change my regard for Scripture one bit.
i agree it is common knowledge nowadays( easily accessible for who look anyway) but it does cast serious doubt upon the veracity of the text when you do not know who wrote it nor when. My regard for scriptures changed when I realized the gospels(and a good bunch of paul's letters and acts) where very unlikely to have been written by the apostle bearing their names, that's all. Who wrote the gospels? Eyewitness with a fresh memory of the events? Seems unlikely. So how is this account reliable? you tell me.
 
S

Simeon

Guest
#87
You should read The Case For Christ by Lee Strobel. It is a factual look at scripture. I have all the proof I need as I know Jesus.
I have read Strobel. How to put this tactfully? Hum, don't think i can. Strobel is a joke and there is very little that is factual in his book. If that kind of arguments are enough for you, then you are much more credulous than i can accept to be. critical thinking is a valuable skill and christians should be good critical thinkers too, of this i am convinced. to scorn critical thinking is to invite error because the only way to avoid error is to detect it.
 
S

Simeon

Guest
#88
[when somebody like snookman says he "knows" Jesus without need for proofs, how does that "know" has anything to do with the concept of "justified belief" that episthemologist talk about?

faith is not knowledge, they are different things, different words, different concepts.

the way i see it, there is belief in (X) and then if there are proofs that that belief is true, then (X) is a knowledge, and if there is no proof, then we take (X) on faith. Faith is on the opposite spectrum of knowledge on the sliding scale of beliefs.
i have come to a point where faith is not enough, I want knowledge. i'm struggling to find true knowledge in christianity and you guys are really not making a good case for it here.
 
S

Simeon

Guest
#89
My apologies for not notating the Scripture reference I posted. It is proverbs 3:5.
Great verses you posted! Not sure if they have a bearing on what I said.

The world says "show me and I'll believe" God says "believe and I will show you".

You are a man. Your brain weighs about 3 lbs. How can you POSSIBLY expect to understand all the motives and plans OF THE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE? Especially by leaning on YOUR understanding?

Let the Peace of our Lord and savior reign in your heart and trust in Him alone, and He will reveal Himself through His word, and other ways to you.
i never said i wanted to understand "all the motives and plans of the creator of the universe". where did you get that notion? i just said that reason should be able to help us determine what God wants and expects from us. so i would know what to do. as it is i have no way to determine what god wants or expect from me. i surmise that if god gave us a brain , presumably it was so we used it.
trust, hope and faith are not knowledge, they are trust, hope and faith.
 
T

TonyJay

Guest
#90
i agree it is common knowledge nowadays( easily accessible for who look anyway) but it does cast serious doubt upon the veracity of the text when you do not know who wrote it nor when. My regard for scriptures changed when I realized the gospels(and a good bunch of paul's letters and acts) where very unlikely to have been written by the apostle bearing their names, that's all. Who wrote the gospels? Eyewitness with a fresh memory of the events? Seems unlikely. So how is this account reliable? you tell me.
Actually you can go read it for yourself if you so inclined.
There are plenty of books dealing with how the NT came into being.
As for you doubts, it is not about who wrote what but rather the subject of those books.
It is actually up to you!
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,343
6,630
113
#91
i never said i wanted to understand "all the motives and plans of the creator of the universe". where did you get that notion? i just said that reason should be able to help us determine what God wants and expects from us. so i would know what to do. as it is i have no way to determine what god wants or expect from me. i surmise that if god gave us a brain , presumably it was so we used it.
trust, hope and faith are not knowledge, they are trust, hope and faith.
Brother.
I have not read all of your comments here on this thread, nor is this comment intended to be critical of any position you may be debating here, but what you are saying in this comment causes me some concern.

Depending on OUR "reasoning," to find what Gods will is for us will never work. We MUST depend on the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit to reveal Gods will for us to us. The wisdom (reasoning) of man will NEVER compare to the guidance from the Holy Spirit.

Rather than seek "reasoning," pray for guidance. (just saying)
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
#92
My point is that the bible is actually pretty confusing about this as clearly indicated by the number of people who answered yes, i would. Are you saying they Are not christians and know nothing about their faith? I think instead it shows that the message is unclear and open to interpretation, hence my doubts and confusion. ( not about sacrifice though, i would NOT sacrifice my child even if God asked).
My doubts now are more about the validity of the communication with God, about how we can know what He wants. The bible appears unreliable and open to interpretation, as my recent search about how many christian denominations there are demonstrate: more than 40000. That leaves direct communication but that doesnt seemvery reliable to me either since it is very subjective So what s left? Nothing i m afraid. We can t be sure what God wants or expect of us. I find that disturbing.
It's not the Bible or God who is confusing but people who are confused.

Abraham lived in a time when child sacrifice was the normal mode.

We still live in a time where witch doctors and Satanist kill and eat babies (just read a paper written in 2000 where someone admited to eating human flesh and watching a boy's body roast over a fire as demons danced around) Worshippers of Shiva are depicted wearing human skulls. At one point the world was so corrupt and evil God destroyed everyone but Noah and his family with a flood.

God promised Abraham that through Isaac (not Ishmael) the Messiah would come. The promised Seed.

God is able to raise people from the dead and by faith Abraham offered up Isaac.

However it was to show that God is not like those fake demonic gods of other nations. He does not take life from His people. He gives it.

The story of Abraham and Isaac when held to the practices of the people surrounding them show God's nature of love and life versus death and destruction called for by other "gods" and idols.

The old testament should be understood through Jesus words and with an understanding that God did not approve of everything that Israel did. We should learn the Spirit of the commandments and not just the letter of the law.
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
#93
[when somebody like snookman says he "knows" Jesus without need for proofs, how does that "know" has anything to do with the concept of "justified belief" that episthemologist talk about?

faith is not knowledge, they are different things, different words, different concepts.

the way i see it, there is belief in (X) and then if there are proofs that that belief is true, then (X) is a knowledge, and if there is no proof, then we take (X) on faith. Faith is on the opposite spectrum of knowledge on the sliding scale of beliefs.
i have come to a point where faith is not enough, I want knowledge. i'm struggling to find true knowledge in christianity and you guys are really not making a good case for it here.
How very strange your words are.

Who do you have faith in? What kind of knowledge do you seek?

There is worldly knowledge and wisdom from above.

Heavenly wisdom is better than 10,000 PHDs, even if it looks to be foolishness to the gentiles.

I have faith in Jesus work on the cross for my salvation.

I have knowledge of God as my Heavenly father, just as you have knowledge of your earthly father.

He is there to speak with and can explain what the Bible says.

Sometimes He tells me that I dont need to know that part yet and focus on these scriptures instead because I will need them for an encounter I will have with someone later that day.

God teaches His children what we need to know. We have His Holy Spirit to lead and guide us.

I trust in God because I have seen the truth of His word and how it has changed my life and the lives of those around me.

I know that the Bible is a love letter to His people, but no subsitute to prayer and being in His presence.

I am sorry if the many differing answers confuse you. Perhaps you should pray and seek God's answer instead?

You assume eye witness accounts are more accurate,i suggest you speak with a police officer and see if your assumptions are based on fact.

We believe the Bible to be written and complied by Holy Spirit lead men seeking God's will.

No matter what language it is translated into, without the Holy Spirit, the Bible will remain veiled to readers. Like the old testament prophecies concerning Jesus were veiled to the disciples until He removed it after His resurrection.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,034
8,717
113
#94
i never said i wanted to understand "all the motives and plans of the creator of the universe". where did you get that notion? i just said that reason should be able to help us determine what God wants and expects from us. so i would know what to do. as it is i have no way to determine what god wants or expect from me. i surmise that if god gave us a brain , presumably it was so we used it.
trust, hope and faith are not knowledge, they are trust, hope and faith.
Knowledge without wisdom is worse than worthless. It is dangerous. Trust in the Lord. Accept Jesus. Let the Holy Spirit enlighten you. Please meditate on this verse:

John 3:12

[SUP]12 [/SUP]If I have told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things?
 
S

Simeon

Guest
#95
Thanks you all for your advice and comments, I really appreciate it.

What you are saying is not resonating with me though, I can't help it. I do not and have never felt what you describe as the Holy spirit, and praying doesn't seem to help. Maybe I'm on the wrong forum, I feel like I stepped through the looking glass here. Understand though that I do not mean to offend.

I'm questioning the meaning of faith, and of the terms you use like "guidance from the Holy spirit", "wisdom from above", "trust in the Lord", "accepting Jesus"... It seems like a cop out to me, a way to reach a conclusion about the meaning of it all, without having to deal with facts and reasons and evidence. You are telling me "faith" trumps "wordly knowledge". To me it sounds like "believing without suficient evidence " trumps "evidence based knowledge" to determine what is true. I'm utterly baffled by this. you are talking about some kind of "subjective truth". Have any of you ever studied any philosophy, have any exposure to epistemology, psychology, cognitive sciences? Nobody in his right mind can advocate that subsituting emotions for evidence is going to lead to truth, the risk of error is tremendous.

I cannot help but think that what you are saying boils down to a very subjective conclusion, nothing objective, concrete, nothing certain or even probable. For example, if faith, "wisdom from above" was in anyway reliable, I would expect everybody to agree about the important stuff, because it would be obvious to anybody who honestly asks.
If God wants everyone to be a good christian, because christianity is the one true faith, why would God allow 40 000 different christian denominations, not counting the various jewish sects, the mormons, the jehova's witnesses, the muslims...Why would God give all those admirers of Him, according to THEIR testimony, spiritual experiences and the urge to write down or re interpret scriptures in ways that would confirm their own faith tradition and send them on that trajectory?

"Wisdom from above" is too vague, too subjective, to open to interpretation to have any value, to be of any help to find truth, how else do we explain the fact that there is more than even one church?
Surely to know we are right, we need to have more than a very subjective "guidance from the Holy spirit" to ground our worldviews, to acertain they are correct... if a vague subjective feeling is what it takes to "know" the truth, then anything goes, who's to say the hindoo, the muslim, the jew or the mormon are not the ones favored by God? If we're all saying: "we're the ones who got it right because God tells us so in our heart" then frankly there is no way to determine who is right and anything goes. That's a huge problem, don't you see it?
 
Jul 23, 2015
1,950
7
0
#96
My apologies for not notating the Scripture reference I posted. It is proverbs 3:5.
Great verses you posted! Not sure if they have a bearing on what I said.

The world says "show me and I'll believe" God says "believe and I will show you".

You are a man. Your brain weighs about 3 lbs. How can you POSSIBLY expect to understand all the motives and plans OF THE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE? Especially by leaning on YOUR understanding?

Let the Peace of our Lord and savior reign in your heart and trust in Him alone, and He will reveal Himself through His word, and other ways to you.
:whistle: this explain a lot of things
about human limitation
thanks for reminding us
for we are only a servant
and the servant is not greater than his master
 
Jul 23, 2015
1,950
7
0
#97
Thanks you all for your advice and comments, I really appreciate it.

What you are saying is not resonating with me though, I can't help it. I do not and have never felt what you describe as the Holy spirit, and praying doesn't seem to help. Maybe I'm on the wrong forum, I feel like I stepped through the looking glass here. Understand though that I do not mean to offend.

I'm questioning the meaning of faith, and of the terms you use like "guidance from the Holy spirit", "wisdom from above", "trust in the Lord", "accepting Jesus"... It seems like a cop out to me, a way to reach a conclusion about the meaning of it all, without having to deal with facts and reasons and evidence. You are telling me "faith" trumps "wordly knowledge". To me it sounds like "believing without suficient evidence " trumps "evidence based knowledge" to determine what is true. I'm utterly baffled by this. you are talking about some kind of "subjective truth". Have any of you ever studied any philosophy, have any exposure to epistemology, psychology, cognitive sciences? Nobody in his right mind can advocate that subsituting emotions for evidence is going to lead to truth, the risk of error is tremendous.

I cannot help but think that what you are saying boils down to a very subjective conclusion, nothing objective, concrete, nothing certain or even probable. For example, if faith, "wisdom from above" was in anyway reliable, I would expect everybody to agree about the important stuff, because it would be obvious to anybody who honestly asks.
If God wants everyone to be a good christian, because christianity is the one true faith, why would God allow 40 000 different christian denominations, not counting the various jewish sects, the mormons, the jehova's witnesses, the muslims...Why would God give all those admirers of Him, according to THEIR testimony, spiritual experiences and the urge to write down or re interpret scriptures in ways that would confirm their own faith tradition and send them on that trajectory?

"Wisdom from above" is too vague, too subjective, to open to interpretation to have any value, to be of any help to find truth, how else do we explain the fact that there is more than even one church?
Surely to know we are right, we need to have more than a very subjective "guidance from the Holy spirit" to ground our worldviews, to acertain they are correct... if a vague subjective feeling is what it takes to "know" the truth, then anything goes, who's to say the hindoo, the muslim, the jew or the mormon are not the ones favored by God? If we're all saying: "we're the ones who got it right because God tells us so in our heart" then frankly there is no way to determine who is right and anything goes. That's a huge problem, don't you see it?
:haha: as it is written
:read:
Isaias: 65. 16. That he who blesseth himself in the earth shall bless himself in the God of truth; and he that sweareth in the earth shall swear by the God of truth; because the former troubles are forgotten, and because they are hid from mine eyes.
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
#98
That you don't know God and have never heard from the Holy Spirit? Yes it is evident it's a big problem.

It is evident you don't understand faith because it's not just feelings or subjective.

You just look at the facts of the different religions...do you believe in a works based gospel or a grace based gospel?

Or do you even believe in God at all?

Muslims, Jews, Buddhist, Mormons and even some people claiming to be Christian believe in a set of laws or sutras that will lead people to enlightenment or right relationship with God. They all boil down to a works based gospel that enslaved people to their sin and striving for their own righteousness.

Jesus came into the world and brought the Gospel of grace through faith in His redeeming work upon the cross. Most people will think it foolish but for those who believe it is salvation. God sends His Holy Spirit to teach His children the rest.

It's no more subjective than if someone walked up and Gibbs slapped you on the head.

You can seek to analyze it and take it apart, ...
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
#99
1 Corinthians: 1. 17. For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. 18. For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. 19. For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent. 20. Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21. For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. 22. For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: 23. But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; 24. But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God. 25. Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men. 26. For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called: 27. But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; 28. And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are: 29. That no flesh should glory in his presence. 30. But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption: 31. That, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord. -


**** posted for my brothers and sisters in Christ.****

Will pray for you Simeon.
 

fredoheaven

Senior Member
Nov 17, 2015
4,012
934
113
Thanks you all for your advice and comments, I really appreciate it.


I'm questioning the meaning of faith, and of the terms you use like "guidance from the Holy spirit", "wisdom from above", "trust in the Lord", "accepting Jesus"... It seems like a cop out to me, a way to reach a conclusion about the meaning of it all, without having to deal with facts and reasons and evidence. You are telling me "faith" trumps "wordly knowledge". To me it sounds like "believing without suficient evidence " trumps "evidence based knowledge" to determine what is true. I'm utterly baffled by this. you are talking about some kind of "subjective truth". Have any of you ever studied any philosophy, have any exposure to epistemology, psychology, cognitive sciences? Nobody in his right mind can advocate that subsituting emotions for evidence is going to lead to truth, the risk of error is tremendous.
Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

Faith has its sure evidence, it is the one you hoped for.

Example:

You post this thread that you know someone will interact, because many interacts in your posts thus this serves evidence of what you long for a discussion...