1. My nickname was chosen because we live in an age of knowledge, nothing more. A wise person would have asked. You never did. Instead, you made a false assertion wielded as an ad hominem billy club against me. That would put the moral fault squarely on your head. It's not pride of mine but rather ignorance and false witness against a Christian from you.
2. I'm well read because I spent twenty years at college at night after my honorable discharge. I never married, never had children, but rather spent my time working all day at full time jobs to earn a living and then going to college at night. I have four degrees and numerous certifications. They were all earned the hard way and I paid for them out of my pocket from my day job. No mommy and daddy help, no trust fund. That's called hard work. If you want to put it down, then that too is on you not me.
3. No you didn't but Strangelove did. If you hadn't noticed, we were having a discussion in this thread before he was banned permanently. I'm still here. The crème always rises to the top. Lol.
4. No one doesn't. One can be very independent and find best fits for information.
The rest of your post looks like rambling to me. Have a nice day.
See the problem here AOK is exactly thisI.E.
1 your avatarial name: would suggest that you are a very intelligent person of whom comes volumes of relatively accurate knowledge albeit with its own personal slant and that perhaps you believe yourself to be second in authoritative information under Christ himself... PRIDE, prime sin the first
2 Regardless of the information age you are too well read(it would seem)on almost any topic or subtopic (which implies chipping paint or shuffling papers wasn't the only thing you did) either that or you are FOS
3 I have NEVER claimed a Jewish Pharisitical Talmudic global domination conspiracy those are nothing more than red herrings for those who consider themselves wise and attempt to lay down the gauntlet as it were for those who also think that they are wise......pffffff...........PLEASE.......
4 When figuring out a global political and economic Landscape one has to assume a posture of stance. What side are you picking correct?
5 If you are picking side A then you will only focus on the propagation of side A not side B and vice versa therefore regardless of what side you pick your information will only be focused on the affirmation and vindication of said side correct? ( You have obviously picked a side)
6 In the case of global political economical landscapes since neither side can be trusted you have to be independent as I recall you claimed of yourself in another thread so do I, so the argument then becomes who can discern the truth from both sides propaganda to get a true picture?
7 As any good military man will tell you when referring to the enemy "body count is the best measure of sucess"
8 In considering this then one only has to look at the body count and to where they lie as a measure of success.
9 If we were to take in strictly the body count of the people who have been murdered under whatever banner since 1777 and then look at who would gain most economically and politically )both pertain to greed and power and the maintaining of said power) then it is not that hard to extrude from that the source of the oppression and willful misuse of power and money and its roots.
10In doing this one has to start far back in history to get a true picture of said landscape because all things created by man take time to create. Todays political landscape has been sculpted for years it is no accident (no I do not believe in predestination) Freedom of choice yada yada.
11 Since the global political map itself wasn't existant as yet in 1750 I use 1777 as an approximate year of the inception of todays political and economical structure to support this theory I propose this because it wasn't until Captain Cooks famous ramblings that the entire usable modern world as we know it was discovered. As well this would have been the zenith of the enlightenment era leading up to the napoleonic wars and the modern industrial age which oddly enough happened the same time that the Rothchild fortune was being made, but lets not get off topic or you will call this a baseles rant with no supposition I'M sure.
12 In conclusion when viewed from outside the box using the body count method and coupled with the considered percieved needs of the day in regards towards gaining ever more political and economic power over the earth and its people and maintaining it. It is not too difficult when sifted to find the pebbles in the sand! 1700 years ago a wise roman said "He who benefits most from a crime is most likely to have committed it"
Find those who benefits most from the modern worlds political and economical structure and you will find the perpetraters of the greatest crimes against humanity!
Selah
