13 Russians Charged for Election Meddling
- Thread starter Billyd
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
It's hardly even that.
I think their game is "Well, we are still adversaries with the Americans, but we don't have the resources to do what we did during the Cold War. Why don't we just make it look like we're doing something and watch their Western heads spin? Trollolololl...Comrade"
Don't feed them.
I think their game is "Well, we are still adversaries with the Americans, but we don't have the resources to do what we did during the Cold War. Why don't we just make it look like we're doing something and watch their Western heads spin? Trollolololl...Comrade"
Don't feed them.
For the record, I don't support the Russian government. I think they are less powerful and even more screwed up than our own. A lot of the pro-religion, pro-family stuff is a mask for a country drenched in vodka and suicide.
It's very tragic. If only the Green/White Russians won a hundred years ago.
It's very tragic. If only the Green/White Russians won a hundred years ago.
Yeah.
Even her own campaign staff saw the Russian interference thing as her own personal boogeyman. They were happy to go with it when they lost because it re-directed fire away from them.
Their main charge at the time was that Wikileaks got their information from Russian hackers. Assange denied it though and, say what you like about him, he's pretty honest about where he doesn't get his information from. Has been since W. was President.
Read Shattered. Awesome book about how screwed up the Clinton campaign was. Written by Dems.
Even her own campaign staff saw the Russian interference thing as her own personal boogeyman. They were happy to go with it when they lost because it re-directed fire away from them.
Their main charge at the time was that Wikileaks got their information from Russian hackers. Assange denied it though and, say what you like about him, he's pretty honest about where he doesn't get his information from. Has been since W. was President.
Read Shattered. Awesome book about how screwed up the Clinton campaign was. Written by Dems.
That's pretty much the book's central thesis. She was a poor candidate who couldn't get her own house in order let alone convince any swing state voters. There were so many bizarre instances where the campaign would call up field organizers and activist groups and tell them not to do anything. It was a mad house.
Believe it or not, I managed to predict the outcome pretty closely with the national polls. It's not that the polls were bad. People just shared them without really knowing how to read them. That and the Clinton campaign and mainstream news wanted to make them opinion-shaping stories. Mostly for purposes of voter suppression.
But it sounds like the dude you were watching had it right- national polling methods are troublesome. If you have the time to go small poll by small poll and work your way up, you will generally arrive at a more accurate prediction. Partially because you're thinking about all the different mechanics involved.
But it sounds like the dude you were watching had it right- national polling methods are troublesome. If you have the time to go small poll by small poll and work your way up, you will generally arrive at a more accurate prediction. Partially because you're thinking about all the different mechanics involved.
That's tricky. Even if the numbers bore out, a speculative Trump victory would assume a lot of other qualitative factors from 2016 would be present in the 2012 race.
I think Obama would've been too tough a customer in 2012. He also would have Putin on his side
I think Obama would've been too tough a customer in 2012. He also would have Putin on his side