3 Step Plan LGBT Mafia To Destroy Christian Church

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
K

krow

Guest
#81
I am sorry that you feel that way because it is a lie. I have been involved in helping men with an unwanted same sex attraction for some years and as a result of this and much study I have identified the cause and effect that makes a man want to choose this way of life.

At the same time there are many more around my country that have done the same. So a bit of looking and googling might help resolve your issues and claims that christian men are clueless.
Hah, okay, why do I have attractions towards other men, o wise one? You are lying from the start so it will be interesting to see what you have to say, instead of admitting a simple truth. And if you don't know what THAT is, how can you really figure out ANYTHING related to this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#82
"Child molestation and pedophilia occur far more commonly among homosexuals than among heterosexuals on a per capita basis, according to a new study that states, 'homosexual activists efforts to target children both for their own sexual pleasure and to enlarge the homosexual movement constitute an unmistakable attack on the family unit.'

The report is substantiated in a recently completed body of work written by Dr. Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education and author of numerous authoritative books debunking sexual myths, including 'Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences.'

In her thesis, Reisman cited psychologist Eugene Abel, whose research found that homosexuals 'sexually molest young boys with an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls…'

'The rate of homosexual versus heterosexual child sexual abuse is staggering,' said Reisman, who was the principal investigator for an $800,000 Justice Department grant studying child pornography and violence. 'Abel’s data of 150.2 boys abused per male homosexual offender finds no equal (yet) in heterosexual violations of 19.8 girls.'”

Report: Pedophilia more common among ‘gays’

It Begins: Pedophiles Call for Same Rights as Homosexuals � Pat Dollard



My apologies to everyone but that is the most ignorant comment I have read. I went to a homosexual national conference for homosexuals and their supporters (I was neither). One workshop was on sex with children. The presenter (William Allan) who obviously was a homosexual pedophile boasted that he had sex with over 200 boys.

Obviously someone was not too happy about that because he was arrested a few weeks later for pedophile homosexuality. A few weeks later he hung himself.

When I interviewed a homosexual pedophile to see if he could benefit from the support group I ran he detailed the techniques of how he would capture young boys in his net.

Surveys show that per head of population, homosexuals are more prevalent in the pedophile ranks than heterosexuals.

So, when you are not in denial, pedophilia has everything to do with homosexuality.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#85

mustaphadrink

Senior Member
Dec 13, 2013
1,987
371
83
#86
Hah, okay, why do I have attractions towards other men, o wise one? You are lying from the start so it will be interesting to see what you have to say, instead of admitting a simple truth. And if you don't know what THAT is, how can you really figure out ANYTHING related to this?
Thankyou for confirming what I said was the truth as I have found almost without exception that homosexuals only oppose the truth, never lies because they are in denial and as a result they believe their lies to be the truth. Most of the time the only ones that are not in denial are those who want help to get rid of their unwanted same sex attraction.

Unfortunately, you have yet to realise that your particular experience does not make it the yardstick which everyone else makes their judgment by. Mine is not based on one person's experience. It is based on many homosexuals with an unwanted same sex attraction and years of study and listening and reading the stories of those who had an unwanted same sex attraction and no longer have.

It would be foolish of me to say that after all that research and experience I should ditch it all because Joe says otherwise.
 
J

J-Kay-2

Guest
#87
Neil Munro
White House Correspondent


President Barack Obama is expected to deny federal contracts to companies and non-profits — including religious employers — that treat homosexuality differently from heterosexuality, according to White House officials.
That’s a huge step, because federal contractors employ roughly 20 percent of the nation’s workforce.
Progressives applauded the announcement — which comes one day before a major fundraiser with gay donors — and demanded that Obama leave no exceptions, even for religious non-profits that use federal dollars to aid the poor and disadvantaged.
It
is now vitally important for all of us to insist that this executive order, when eventually signed by the president, does not include religious exemptions that would permit taxpayer dollars to be spent on discrimination,” said a statement from Heather Cronk, the co-director of the GetEQUAL advocacy group.
The executive order has no been written yet, but if there are few or no exceptions, federal contractors or religious charities that aid the poor would be exposed to lawsuits if they decline to hire and promote
homosexuals or people who dress as members of the other sex. Religious charities frequently provide services under government contracts.
“LGBT Americans need these protections immediately, and without the gaping holes that exemptions would create,” Cronk insisted.
Social conservatives objected to the pending regulation, which bypasses congressional opposition to the workplace rule.
“This is yet another example of what little regard President Obama has for the American people and our form of government,” said Mario Diaz, the legal council at Concerned Women for America.
“Democracy, once again, gets in the way of his personal preferences, and so he disregards it with little concern for the long-term implications of his actions… [He] only continues to divide and demonize people of faith who continue to believe as he claims he did not too long ago,” said Diaz, referring to the president’s prior claims to support religious autonomy and child-focused marriage.
Obama’s executive order is being described as an “anti-discrimination” measure because it would allow gay people, and people who say they want to live as members of the opposite sex, to use anti-discrimination law when they’re fired, demoted, not promoted.











by Taboola

Sponsored Content





But it would also force federally funded employers — whether religious or not — to treat homosexuality the same as heterosexuality.
Less than 5 percent of Americans are gay or lesbian. Far less than 1 percent say they wish to live as members of the opposite sex.
Gay advocates have pushed Congress to pass nationwide rules against different treatment in the workplace. But the GOP’s majority in the House has blocked those proposals.
Progressive groups praised the proposed order, which follows Obama’s 2012 push for a redefinition of marriage to allow for same-sex marriage.
“This president has done more for the struggle for [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] equality than all previous presidents combined,” said a statement from Anthony Romero, the gay director of the American Civil Liberties Union. “Barring discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity with taxpayer funds
by all federal contractors will begin to undo one of the last vestiges of legally sanctioned discrimination,” he said.
Follow Neil on Twitter
Tags: Barack Obama, Concerned Women for America


Read more: Religious Groups LGBT Gay Contractors Executive Order Obama | The Daily Caller
 
J

J-Kay-2

Guest
#88
Neil Munro
White House Correspondent


President Barack Obama is expected to deny federal contracts to companies and non-profits — including religious employers — that treat homosexuality differently from heterosexuality, according to White House officials.
That’s a huge step, because federal contractors employ roughly 20 percent of the nation’s workforce.
Progressives applauded the announcement — which comes one day before a major fundraiser with gay donors — and demanded that Obama leave no exceptions, even for religious non-profits that use federal dollars to aid the poor and disadvantaged.
It
is now vitally important for all of us to insist that this executive order, when eventually signed by the president, does not include religious exemptions that would permit taxpayer dollars to be spent on discrimination,” said a statement from Heather Cronk, the co-director of the GetEQUAL advocacy group.
The executive order has no been written yet, but if there are few or no exceptions, federal contractors or religious charities that aid the poor would be exposed to lawsuits if they decline to hire and promote
homosexuals or people who dress as members of the other sex. Religious charities frequently provide services under government contracts.
“LGBT Americans need these protections immediately, and without the gaping holes that exemptions would create,” Cronk insisted.
Social conservatives objected to the pending regulation, which bypasses congressional opposition to the workplace rule.
“This is yet another example of what little regard President Obama has for the American people and our form of government,” said Mario Diaz, the legal council at Concerned Women for America.
“Democracy, once again, gets in the way of his personal preferences, and so he disregards it with little concern for the long-term implications of his actions… [He] only continues to divide and demonize people of faith who continue to believe as he claims he did not too long ago,” said Diaz, referring to the president’s prior claims to support religious autonomy and child-focused marriage.
Obama’s executive order is being described as an “anti-discrimination” measure because it would allow gay people, and people who say they want to live as members of the opposite sex, to use anti-discrimination law when they’re fired, demoted, not promoted.







And you shall know the Truth and it shall set you free..



by Taboola

Sponsored Content





But it would also force federally funded employers — whether religious or not — to treat homosexuality the same as heterosexuality.
Less than 5 percent of Americans are gay or lesbian. Far less than 1 percent say they wish to live as members of the opposite sex.
Gay advocates have pushed Congress to pass nationwide rules against different treatment in the workplace. But the GOP’s majority in the House has blocked those proposals.
Progressive groups praised the proposed order, which follows Obama’s 2012 push for a redefinition of marriage to allow for same-sex marriage.
“This president has done more for the struggle for [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] equality than all previous presidents combined,” said a statement from Anthony Romero, the gay director of the American Civil Liberties Union. “Barring discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity with taxpayer funds
by all federal contractors will begin to undo one of the last vestiges of legally sanctioned discrimination,” he said.
Follow Neil on Twitter
Tags: Barack Obama, Concerned Women for America


Read more: Religious Groups LGBT Gay Contractors Executive Order Obama | The Daily Caller
 
L

Last

Guest
#89
When the Christian church was hit by a hostile takeover in 325AD by Constantine of Rome, it disappeared for the next 1,200+ years into the shroud of pagan Roman Catholicism. We call that period of time the Dark Ages.
"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!" Isaiah 5:20


1) Constantine did not take over Christianity. Constantine legalize it, that was it.
2) 325-1525 is not call the Dark Ages. The Dark Ages began after the fall of the Roman Empire and it was called that because Europe was isolated and divided. It had nothing to do with the legalization of Christianity.
 
Dec 16, 2013
174
4
18
#90
I'm just going to throw my .02$ in real fast on a conversation that seems to be turning into a pretty big ordeal in the forum so far.

The LGBT community compares them self often to the civil rights movement, but there is a WORLD of difference between the two. The "Civil" Rights movement was centered around CIVIL disobedience, not on imposing sudden dramatic changes upon the scope of society as a whole, and forcing the government to endorse same sex marriages. The LGBT community wants to make legal the marriage of a same sex couple...

Really and truly, a "marriage" between a man and a man or a woman and a woman is not a marriage at all. Marriage eventually should result in children, and for a homosexual couple to be married is rather a direct contradiction of what the institution of marriage is. it's a biological impossibility for a man and a man to have a child, as it is for a woman and a woman to have a child. But that is neither here nor there...

I believe the true intent of the LGBT community could indeed be something far more sinister than just making legal the marriage of same sex couples, as the thread of the topic suggetss. Forcing the government, and society at large to accept same sex marriages as the norm will open Pandora's Box, I guarantee it. And of course, it won't stop there. If this goes through nationally (which it likely will at this rate) then we can also expect to see polygamy legalized. Incest will also become more common, and children will be objectified. Give an inch... and they will take a mile. The same argument that's being used by the LGBT community for same sex marriages can and WILLl be used in the other scenarios I've listed.

We don't have to submit and be trampled underfoot by this organization. Last time I checked, God's Army reigns supreme, so it's time to demonstrate our strength and solidarity before they who would defile the most sacred of institutions.
 
Last edited:
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#91
I'm just going to throw my .02$ in real fast on a conversation that seems to be turning into a pretty big ordeal in the forum so far.

The LGBT community compares them self often to the civil rights movement, but there is a WORLD of difference between the two. The "Civil" Rights movement was centered around CIVIL disobedience, not on imposing sudden dramatic changes upon the scope of society as a whole, and forcing the government to endorse same sex marriages. The LGBT community wants to make legal the marriage of a same sex couple...

Really and truly, a "marriage" between a man and a man or a woman and a woman is not a marriage at all. Marriage eventually should result in children, and for a homosexual couple to be married is rather a direct contradiction of what the institution of marriage is. it's a biological impossibility for a man and a man to have a child, as it is for a woman and a woman to have a child. But that is neither here nor there...

I believe the true intent of the LGBT community could indeed be something far more sinister than just making legal the marriage of same sex couples, as the thread of the topic suggetss. Forcing the government, and society at large to accept same sex marriages as the norm will open Pandora's Box, I guarantee it. And of course, it won't stop there. If this goes through nationally (which it likely will at this rate) then we can also expect to see polygamy legalized. Incest will also become more common, and children will be objectified. Give an inch... and they will take a mile. The same argument that's being used by the LGBT community for same sex marriages can and WILLl be used in the other scenarios I've listed.

We don't have to submit and be trampled underfoot by this organization. Last time I checked, God's Army reigns supreme, so it's time to demonstrate our strength and solidarity before they who would defile the most sacred of institutions.
What no one seems to understand is that the LGBT community can only defile the word marriage. It's impossible for them to defile marriage because it's impossible for them to get married. Remember the gates of Hell CANNOT prevail.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#92
One thing's for sure, people who choose to reject God's holiness and malign His Word so they can live the life of a sodomite won't be defiling heaven.
 
J

J-Kay-2

Guest
#93
One thing's for sure, people who choose to reject God's holiness and malign His Word so they can live the life of a sodomite won't be defiling heaven.

Could not have said it better ..... J~K~2
 

mustaphadrink

Senior Member
Dec 13, 2013
1,987
371
83
#94
It
is now vitally important for all of us to insist that this executive order, when eventually signed by the president, does not include religious exemptions that would permit taxpayer dollars to be spent on discrimination,” said a statement from Heather Cronk, the co-director of the GetEQUAL advocacy group.
Two things here.

One....if this executive order goes through, it will mean that the president is discriminating against the poor and the needy. What it is saying is that you can only get help if you side with the homosexuals. For most of the poor and needy, what is more important is not whether the homosexuals impose their will on society, but where is my next meal coming from.

To use the poor and needy as a punching bag for the homosexuals selfishness is selfish in the extreme and Obama should be totally ashamed of himself to be used as a tool to bring society to heel like this.

Two....Heather Cronk knows full well that her claim to equality for homosexuals is bogus. She knows that she is interested in one thing only and that is to destroy society as we know it and reinvent it in the homosexual image where all perverted sex will be legal even that between men and boys.
 

mustaphadrink

Senior Member
Dec 13, 2013
1,987
371
83
#95
I believe the true intent of the LGBT community could indeed be something far more sinister than just making legal the marriage of same sex couples, as the thread of the topic suggetss. Forcing the government, and society at large to accept same sex marriages as the norm will open Pandora's Box, I guarantee it. And of course, it won't stop there. If this goes through nationally (which it likely will at this rate) then we can also expect to see polygamy legalized. Incest will also become more common, and children will be objectified. Give an inch... and they will take a mile. The same argument that's being used by the LGBT community for same sex marriages can and WILLl be used in the other scenarios I've listed.
First it is great to see a young man stand up for the truth. So many of them, particularly christian young men have swallowed the homosexual lies hook, line and sinker.

Second, same sex marriage is only ONE STEP towards a Utopian homosexual society. In their devilish planning and ideas, they want society destroyed and reinvented in the homosexual image where all deviate sex, even between men and boys to be legal and the reason for this is that satan wants to demolish the image of God in society. The best way he can do that is to destroy God's plan and intention for marriage which is likened to the church and its relationship with Jesus.

They want to destroy the authority structure, the church being the last bastion of that so that anything goes.

There is a civil war going on right now and it is being waged with weasel words. The homosexuals are slowly reinventing the meanings of words like tolerance, bigotry, equality, rights, gay, etc. etc. to make everyone who disagrees with them the enemy and worthy of punishment and the government has fallen for it big time.

Our only hope is the elect who cannot be deceived. They will have to make a choice to stand firm for the truth or be swallowed up with the rest of the pseudo christians who will crash and burn big time.
 

mustaphadrink

Senior Member
Dec 13, 2013
1,987
371
83
#96
We don't have to submit and be trampled underfoot by this organization. Last time I checked, God's Army reigns supreme, so it's time to demonstrate our strength and solidarity before they who would defile the most sacred of institutions.
Just a thought. There are many similes in scripture to the church being an army. The most telling probably is putting on the whole Armour of God.

Sad to say too many christians are signing up for the fishing club rather than the army as they prefer to sit on the riverbank and while away the time in gentle pursuit than man up for God's Army and fight to the death (I die daily).
 
Dec 16, 2013
174
4
18
#97
Just a thought. There are many similes in scripture to the church being an army. The most telling probably is putting on the whole Armour of God.

Sad to say too many christians are signing up for the fishing club rather than the army as they prefer to sit on the riverbank and while away the time in gentle pursuit than man up for God's Army and fight to the death (I die daily).
I don't think I could have made that connection in the Bible any better than you have sir. The Church ABSOLUTELY is an Army, which necessitates that we be strong soldiers for the Lord our God. That means, that when outside influences try to break down the walls of our chapel, when the world tries to impose it's order of business upon our faith... we must unite our strengths as one to combat the very present and persistent evils that will stop at nothing to see us undone.
 
J

J-Kay-2

Guest
#98
Awesome replies guys.... all of you have much wisdom.....
God bless you and I sincerely mean that... You have taken
a touchy topic and made wise comments, and I appreciate
you all. ~ J~ K~2
 
K

krow

Guest
#99
I'm just going to throw my .02$ in real fast on a conversation that seems to be turning into a pretty big ordeal in the forum so far.

The LGBT community compares them self often to the civil rights movement, but there is a WORLD of difference between the two. The "Civil" Rights movement was centered around CIVIL disobedience, not on imposing sudden dramatic changes upon the scope of society as a whole, and forcing the government to endorse same sex marriages. The LGBT community wants to make legal the marriage of a same sex couple...

Really and truly, a "marriage" between a man and a man or a woman and a woman is not a marriage at all. Marriage eventually should result in children, and for a homosexual couple to be married is rather a direct contradiction of what the institution of marriage is. it's a biological impossibility for a man and a man to have a child, as it is for a woman and a woman to have a child. But that is neither here nor there...

I believe the true intent of the LGBT community could indeed be something far more sinister than just making legal the marriage of same sex couples, as the thread of the topic suggetss. Forcing the government, and society at large to accept same sex marriages as the norm will open Pandora's Box, I guarantee it. And of course, it won't stop there. If this goes through nationally (which it likely will at this rate) then we can also expect to see polygamy legalized. Incest will also become more common, and children will be objectified. Give an inch... and they will take a mile. The same argument that's being used by the LGBT community for same sex marriages can and WILLl be used in the other scenarios I've listed.

We don't have to submit and be trampled underfoot by this organization. Last time I checked, God's Army reigns supreme, so it's time to demonstrate our strength and solidarity before they who would defile the most sacred of institutions.
So about this part...


Really and truly, a "marriage" between a man and a man or a woman and a woman is not a marriage at all. Marriage eventually should result in children, and for a homosexual couple to be married is rather a direct contradiction of what the institution of marriage is. it's a biological impossibility for a man and a man to have a child, as it is for a woman and a woman to have a child. But that is neither here nor there...

Aren't you forgetting all the married couples that, for whatever reason, don't have children? Marriage is much more than just choosing a person to procreate with, it's choosing to share your life with another person, the good, the, bad and the ugly for better or worse.
 
K

krow

Guest
Thankyou for confirming what I said was the truth as I have found almost without exception that homosexuals only oppose the truth, never lies because they are in denial and as a result they believe their lies to be the truth. Most of the time the only ones that are not in denial are those who want help to get rid of their unwanted same sex attraction.

Unfortunately, you have yet to realise that your particular experience does not make it the yardstick which everyone else makes their judgment by. Mine is not based on one person's experience. It is based on many homosexuals with an unwanted same sex attraction and years of study and listening and reading the stories of those who had an unwanted same sex attraction and no longer have.

It would be foolish of me to say that after all that research and experience I should ditch it all because Joe says otherwise.
Basically you admitted that you don't really know why for sure, but just had to say it in a non pithy manner...