40-storey skyscraper fire does not line up with new understanding of physics

[zone]

Indeed. The architect explained it within a day or two. Maybe even the same day. I've forgotten exactly when now.
There were 4-5/8" bolts holding the ends of each floor support beam. Those bolts were designed to hold those beams in sheer. The fire didn't get hot enough to melt the beams, but it did get hot enough to cause the beams to deflect a little. Once the beams began to deflect, the 5/8" bolts were no longer in sheer but in tension. Since they weren't designed for a tension load with that weight they failed. The weight of the first floor to fail, falling down on the next one, was more weight than that floor was designed to bear, and so on. As the floors pancaked onto the next floor down there would naturally be a little self-aligning as they did so. It would have been difficult for and exoskeletal building like that to have done other than fall in a vertical column.
It was a closely engineered building. I don't get what's so hard to understand.

what infantile rubbish.

...

...

World Trade Center Seven collapsed on September 11, 2001, at 5:20 p.m.

There were no known casualties due to this collapse. The performance of WTC 7 is of significant interest because it appears the collapse was due primarily to fire, rather than any impact damage from the collapsing towers. On the contrary, it appears the collapse was primarily due to
a controlled demolition.

Prior to September 11, 2001, there was little, if any, record of fire-induced collapse of large fire-protected steel buildings. Before September 11, no steel framed skyscraper had ever collapsed due to fire.

On September 11, WTC 7 collapsed totally. It is suggested below that this collapse was exclusively due to fire. No significant evidence is offered to back up this suggestion (after all it is only a suggestion). It should be emphasized that WTC 7 was neither hit by an aircraft nor by significant quantities of debris from the collapse of the twin towers. It is also widely claimed that WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed mainly due to fire. I emphasize, that before September 11, no steel framed skyscraper had ever collapsed due to fire. However, on September 11, it is claimed that three steel framed skyscrapers collapsed mainly, or totally, due to fire.

Chapter 5 - WTC Seven - The WTC Report. < click

controlled demolition.


ever seen one?

odd how it - a controlled demolition - looks exactly like the 3 towers that fell into their own footprints on 9-11.

a controlled demolition looks just like the 9-11 buildings because, and precisely because it was ALL :

controlled demolition


....including the reasoning power of supposedly otherwise thinking people - demolished.....sickening.

show a 5 year old a controlled demolition...then the 3 buildings falling....guess what the 5 year old will say:

controlled demolition

 

[zone]

what reasonable person wouldn't believe this?

the groundskeepers didn't even have to lift a finger.
not a clump of sod, no grass damaged, no scorching....nothing.

for sure.

this jetliner screamed in 3 inches above the ground, didn't bend a blade of grass, left no believable plane wreckage.
and the damage to the building has nothing to do with a jet crashing into it.

no video camera evidence. even though this was the Pentagon.

yep....the cognitive dissonance involved in considering anything other than 19 supernaturally skilled hijackers is so impossbile (since we don't want to know), we'll accept this monstrous and transparent lie instead.

it's easier and safer.
even though it's patently bogus.
i need to live in my bubble and i have been trained to lash out at anyone who would pop my bubble.

E-YUP.

 

[RachelBibleStudent]

...

World Trade Center Seven collapsed on September 11, 2001, at 5:20 p.m.

There were no known casualties due to this collapse. The performance of WTC 7 is of significant interest because it appears the collapse was due primarily to fire, rather than any impact damage from the collapsing towers.

you are looking at the wrong side of the building...your picture is of the northeast side...the -opposite- side from where all the damage was...

compare it with this pre 9/11 image...also viewed from the northeast...



the twin towers were on the -south- side of the building...that is where all the debris hit and where most of the fire damage was...the side that isn't shown in your animated picture...

here is a view of 7 WTC from a different angle...from the west...



the fire is much more obvious here...

if you have trouble visualizing the arrangement of the buildings...here is an aerial photo taken about two weeks later...i will just post the link since the image is huge...
http://thefuntimesguide.com/wp-content/uploads/aerial-view-above-world-trade-center1.jpg

 

[BarlyGurl]

Indeed. The architect explained it within a day or two. Maybe even the same day. I've forgotten exactly when now.
There were 4-5/8" bolts holding the ends of each floor support beam. Those bolts were designed to hold those beams in sheer. The fire didn't get hot enough to melt the beams, but it did get hot enough to cause the beams to deflect a little. Once the beams began to deflect, the 5/8" bolts were no longer in sheer but in tension. Since they weren't designed for a tension load with that weight they failed. The weight of the first floor to fail, falling down on the next one, was more weight than that floor was designed to bear, and so on. As the floors pancaked onto the next floor down there would naturally be a little self-aligning as they did so. It would have been difficult for and exoskeletal building like that to have done other than fall in a vertical column.
It was a closely engineered building. I don't get what's so hard to understand.

The SHEER framing is likened to balloon frame structure sometimes used in houses... it is very sound with proper tie structure... but will collapse if that tie structure is damaged.
some people just like to argue... it gives them an oppurtunity to call you STUPID without actually saying... YOU ARE STUPID.
I notice that no one mentioned how the force of "hit by jetliner" collapsing buildings would make force and shaking likened to a centralized earthquake... and only a few are willing to suggest or learn toward some divine intervention by God.
Myself... all I can really think about when I think about it is watching people jumping to their death because by choice... that was better than burning alive...and I feel sick inside.

 

[zone]

LOL@RACHEL......

controlled demolition

please click here: Controlled Demolition, Inc. | > click


[video=youtube;-TARNVwF7Yg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TARNVwF7Yg[/video]

"CDI - The Art of Demolition"

TheLoizeauxGroupLLC·70

Uploaded on Nov 29, 2010
10+ minutes of stunning imagery from the film and video archives of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI).

....

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such a terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing is to pull it". And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
Larry Silverstein, to PBS Sept 14, 2002.
Silverstein says he and the FD Commander made the decision THAT DAY - 9-11 (late that afternoon!) TO "PULL" (CONTROLLED DEMOLITION) Building 7.


Lucky Larry had become the principal lease-holder of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers just seven weeks before 9/11/01

and, Larry had been Lucky enough to double down on his insurance policy just prior - in case of terrorist attack by jetliner.
since both towers were struck, he got a DOUBLE PAYOUT.

tsk...coincidence and luck is easier to believe than conspiracy.

 

[zone]

The SHEER framing is likened to balloon frame structure sometimes used in houses... it is very sound with proper tie structure... but will collapse if that tie structure is damaged.
some people just like to argue... it gives them an oppurtunity to call you STUPID without actually saying... YOU ARE STUPID.
I notice that no one mentioned how the force of "hit by jetliner" collapsing buildings would make force and shaking likened to a centralized earthquake... and only a few are willing to suggest or learn toward some divine intervention by God.
Myself... all I can really think about when I think about it is watching people jumping to their death because by choice... that was better than burning alive...and I feel sick inside.

nonsense!!
an aluminum jet would crumple and shatter on impact.

like an insect hitting a brick wall.

it would not MELT INTO THE BUILDING...!! LOLOLOLOL

hahaha.....

come on you guys.....seriously?
examine every genuine instance of jet crashes.
they leave a big mess of stuff.....they don't melt into the building and cause a free-fall, exactly like a controlled demolition.
THREE TIMES

 

[zone]

LOL@RACHEL......

controlled demolition

please click here: Controlled Demolition, Inc. | > click


also see YouTube:

"CDI - The Art of Demolition"

TheLoizeauxGroupLLC·70

Uploaded on Nov 29, 2010
10+ minutes of stunning imagery from the film and video archives of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI).

....

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such a terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing is to pull it". And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

Larry Silverstein, to PBS Sept 14, 2002.
Silverstein says he and the FD Commander made the decision THAT DAY - 9-11 (late that afternoon!) TO "PULL" (CONTROLLED DEMOLITION) Building 7.


Lucky Larry had become the principal lease-holder of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers just seven weeks before 9/11/01

and, Larry had been Lucky enough to double down on his insurance policy just prior - in case of terrorist attack by jetliner.
since both towers were struck, he got a DOUBLE PAYOUT.

tsk...coincidence and luck is easier to believe than conspiracy.

[video=youtube;Atbrn4k55lA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Atbrn4k55lA[/video]

9/11: WTC Building 7 "Collapse" video compilation

CONTROLLED DEMO PEOPLE.
easy

 

[zone]

LOL@RACHEL......

controlled demolition

please click here: Controlled Demolition, Inc. | > click


[video=youtube;-TARNVwF7Yg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TARNVwF7Yg[/video]

"CDI - The Art of Demolition"

TheLoizeauxGroupLLC·70

Uploaded on Nov 29, 2010
10+ minutes of stunning imagery from the film and video archives of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI).

....



"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such a terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing is to pull it". And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

Larry Silverstein, to PBS Sept 14, 2002.



Silverstein says he and the FD Commander made the decision THAT DAY - 9-11 (late that afternoon!) TO "PULL" (CONTROLLED DEMOLITION) Building 7.


Lucky Larry had become the principal lease-holder of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers just seven weeks before 9/11/01

and, Larry had been Lucky enough to double down on his insurance policy just prior - in case of terrorist attack by jetliner.
since both towers were struck, he got a DOUBLE PAYOUT.

tsk...coincidence and luck is easier to believe than conspiracy.

For a Controlled Demolition, Call Controlled Demolition, Inc.

Controlled Demoliton, Inc. (CDI), of Baltimore, Maryland is one of the world's leaders in demolishing large buildings. Owned for three generations by the Loizeaux family, CDI details on its website the 'World Records' that the company holds in demolishing huge structures -- monuments such as the former Kingdome in Seattle. The CDI website also relates the timespans that have been required for the company's accomplishments.


How much time would be required for the planning and emplacement of charges for the symmetric implosion of WTC Building 7 that we saw on 9-11? WTC Building 7 was a 47-story tower that sat less than 100 feet from other skyscrapers. We read on the CDI site about a 17-story building of reinforced concrete in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia -- the Sheikh A. Alaki Apartment Building -- which collapsed while under construction by the Bechtel Corporation in 1998.


[TABLE="width: 55%, align: right"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]Preparation for demolition of WTC Building 7 must have preceded 9-11 by weeks, if not months.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
The CDI site relates: 'At the request of Bechtel, Controlled Demolition, Inc.'s team mobilized to the site in less than 24 hours, prepared the central-core, flat slab, reinforced concrete structure in another 27 hours, and put the balance of the building on the ground with absolute safety just 96 hours after the start of demolition preparations.'

96 hours. Four days. This was the time needed for emergency demolition of a 17-story building of reinforced concrete by a CDI team.


A building in Detroit, Mich. of comparable size to WTC Building 7 -- the J L Hudson store, standing 35 stories tall and containing 2.2 million square feet -- took CDI almost five months to prepare and bring down in 1998.
The CDI site reports that after four months of study by associate contractors:

CDI's 12-person loading crew took 24 days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI's implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequences and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lbs of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition.

​

So. Four months, plus an additional 24 days, were needed to place the charges necessary to demolish, within its 420-foot-by-220-foot footprint, a building 12 stories smaller than WTC Building 7.


How, then, could the preparation and emplacement of charges to "pull" WTC Building 7 be accomplished in a single afternoon? In particular, during the tumultuous afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001, right there at 'Ground Zero'?

G&G | The Best Evidence Available on the 9-11 Conspiracy < click


k.....really.

do we know what a controlled demo looks like?


WHO BENEFITED?

 

[BarlyGurl]

DOn't know why you quote my post zone... since I can correlate NOTHING in your rant as applicable to my post. Looks like I will have to disregard its contents as ... nonsense.

 

[zone]

DOn't know why you quote my post zone... since I can correlate NOTHING in your rant as applicable to my post. Looks like I will have to disregard its contents as ... nonsense.

The SHEER framing is likened to balloon frame structure sometimes used in houses... it is very sound with proper tie structure... but will collapse if that tie structure is damaged.

some people just like to argue... it gives them an oppurtunity to call you STUPID without actually saying... YOU ARE STUPID.
I notice that no one mentioned how the force of "hit by jetliner" collapsing buildings would make force and shaking likened to a centralized earthquake... and only a few are willing to suggest or learn toward some divine intervention by God.

make sense of it if you can.
the buildings PANCAKED down into their own footprints?
k.....ya.

 

[RachelBibleStudent]

LOL@RACHEL......

controlled demolition

please click here: Controlled Demolition, Inc. | > click


[video=youtube;-TARNVwF7Yg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TARNVwF7Yg[/video]

"CDI - The Art of Demolition"

TheLoizeauxGroupLLC·70

Uploaded on Nov 29, 2010
10+ minutes of stunning imagery from the film and video archives of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI).

....

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such a terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing is to pull it". And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
Larry Silverstein, to PBS Sept 14, 2002.
Silverstein says he and the FD Commander made the decision THAT DAY - 9-11 (late that afternoon!) TO "PULL" (CONTROLLED DEMOLITION) Building 7.


Lucky Larry had become the principal lease-holder of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers just seven weeks before 9/11/01

and, Larry had been Lucky enough to double down on his insurance policy just prior - in case of terrorist attack by jetliner.
since both towers were struck, he got a DOUBLE PAYOUT.

tsk...coincidence and luck is easier to believe than conspiracy.

in demolition terminology 'pulling' refers specifically to pulling a building down with cables...it does not mean 'blowing it up with explosives'

the 'pulling' silverstein was talking about pulling the firefighting operation out of the building and just letting it collapse...

lol and i am sure if there was a plot to make a controlled demolition look like the result of a terrorist attack...the ones responsible wouldn't be announcing it on PBS... alex jones paradox at work...

 

[zone]

For a Controlled Demolition, Call Controlled Demolition, Inc.

Controlled Demoliton, Inc. (CDI), of Baltimore, Maryland is one of the world's leaders in demolishing large buildings. Owned for three generations by the Loizeaux family, CDI details on its website the 'World Records' that the company holds in demolishing huge structures -- monuments such as the former Kingdome in Seattle. The CDI website also relates the timespans that have been required for the company's accomplishments.

Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building - Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
05/24/1995
The Loizeaux Group, LLC
As the initial rescue operations continued, General Services Administration, the owner of the Murrah Building, contacted Robert Hill, Vice President of the Dallas-based structural engineering firm, Brockette, Davis & Drake and Mark Loizeaux, President of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, Maryland to evaluate the integrity of the structure and to identify the extent of demolition required for that portion of the structure which did not fail in the initial collapse. Robert Hill quickly determined that the main tower of the Murrah Building was damaged beyond repair and that the safest methodology for demolition of the damaged structure was implosion.

Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building - Oklahoma City, Oklahoma | Controlled Demolition, Inc. < click


google around a little and find out what the The Loizeaux Group, LLC was doing prior to 9-11.
and who they are.

 

[zone]

in demolition terminology 'pulling' refers specifically to pulling a building down with cables...it does not mean 'blowing it up with explosives'

the 'pulling' silverstein was talking about pulling the firefighting operation out of the building and just letting it collapse...

lol and i am sure if there was a plot to make a controlled demolition look like the result of a terrorist attack...the ones responsible wouldn't be announcing it on PBS... alex jones paradox at work...

oh.......Larry (the onwer) consults with the FD about going in and PULLING the thing down with cables WHY AGAIN rachel?

was Building 7 in danger of "pancaking into it's own footprint though it had nothing but a couple of little fires inside?
so the FD goes in on that day to PULL down 7 with cables.


could you please show any photo evidence or detail how a building is PULLED into it's own footprint - a CONTROLLED DEMO without hours and hours and planning?

your story reeks like playpen cover-up.

the simplests and most obvious (particularly when you use your own eyes) is always the best answer.

Israel and the Neocons did it, and they planned it decades in advance.

this is really easy rachel.

(but throw alex jones in with nazi; antisemitic; conspiracy theorist...what else?) < just show your level dear, not mine.

 

[zone]

did you want to explain the Pentagon hit by a jetliner post to me rachel?

let's see your story for that.



which cave-dwelling arab was piloting that jet again? do you know?

please cover the pentagon "hit" for me.
thx much

(i could link back to it if you need)

 

[BarlyGurl]

the 'pulling' silverstein was talking about pulling the firefighting operation out of the building and just letting it collapse...

You are accurate in your deduction... in the firefighting profession... "pull" does mean to withdraw from working a fire. saying "pull" meant the same as the term in demolition profession of course be a tremendous conspiracy since it would mean firefighters are also secret demolitionist operatives waiting for their espionage orders...

 

[zone]

in demolition terminology 'pulling' refers specifically to pulling a building down with cables...it does not mean 'blowing it up with explosives'

the 'pulling' silverstein was talking about pulling the firefighting operation out of the building and just letting it collapse...

oh rly?

k......

nothing hit 7. why would it fall rachel?

it had a few tiny fires inside. they could have burned for a month without the building collapsing.


america is under attack, the Twin Towers are down....chaos abounds....but NYPD and Larry decide to PULL out and let 7 free fall.....

Larry makes the call with the FD on the very day America was under terror attack by Muslims.....to:

"the 'pulling' silverstein was talking about pulling the firefighting operation out of the building and just letting it collapse..."

i LOVE 9-11 reality deniers.
Larry said, pull it....that meant just let it defy the laws of physics for the 3rd time that day (even though nothing hit it)...and let it free fall JUST LIKE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

but it couldn't possibly have been a controlled demo.
mkay.
LOL.

 

[zone]

the 'pulling' silverstein was talking about pulling the firefighting operation out of the building and just letting it collapse...

You are accurate in your deduction... in the firefighting profession... "pull" does mean to withdraw from working a fire. saying "pull" meant the same as the term in demolition profession of course be a tremendous conspiracy since it would mean firefighters are also secret demolitionist operatives waiting for their espionage orders...

*cough*

An alternative interpretation of Silverstein's statement is that "pull it" refers to withdrawing firefighters from the building.

However, according to FEMA's report there were no manual firefighting operations in Building 7, so there would not have been any firefighters to "pull" -- at least not from inside the building.

http://www.wtc7.net/femareport.html< click FEMA

 

[RachelBibleStudent]

oh.......Larry (the onwer) consults with the FD about going in and PULLING the thing down with cables WHY AGAIN rachel?

was Building 7 in danger of "pancaking into it's own footprint though it had nothing but a couple of little fires inside?
so the FD goes in on that day to PULL down 7 with cables.


could you please show any photo evidence or detail how a building is PULLED into it's own footprint - a CONTROLLED DEMO without hours and hours and planning?

your story reeks like playpen cover-up.

the simplests and most obvious (particularly when you use your own eyes) is always the best answer.

Israel and the Neocons did it, and they planned it decades in advance.

this is really easy rachel.

(but throw alex jones in with nazi; antisemitic; conspiracy theorist...what else?) < just show your level dear, not mine.

you missed the point...silverstein's conversation had nothing to do with demolition...

'pulling' in the demolition sense would not have resulted in what actually happened...because in demolition 'pulling' means to pull down with cables...not to detonate explosive charges... so silverstein wasn't talking about demolition at all...

instead he was telling the fire department to 'pull' their teams and give up and let the building burn down...

and the 'alex jones paradox' i mentioned refers to what alex jones has said about the government intending to kill him... basically the paradox goes like this...if alex jones is right then alex jones should be dead already...or more generally...if thousands of people can make these kinds of accusations without devastating personal repercussions then it proves that the accusations are not true...

the application of the alex jones paradox to silverstein's interview is that the 'israelis and neocons who control most of the world' aren't going to allow something blatantly incriminating to be aired on PBS...meaning that silverstein wasn't talking about controlled demolition at all...

 

[zone]

I LOVE THE COINCIDENCES.

Prior to the construction of the Pentagon, the War Department (now the Department of Defense) was housed in a series of "temporary" buildings erected during World War I which nearly covered the National Mall.

Ground was broken for the Pentagon on September 11, 1941

Attacked exactly 60 years to the day later.

he-e-e-e-e-ey......where's the lawn damage from a JET roaring in 3 inches above the ground?

where's the plane wreckage?

and what's this?:

Fact Sheet
U.S. Department of State
Washington, DC
August 15, 2002

Pentagon Reconstruction: The Phoenix Project

The Pentagon is the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense in Washington, DC. It consists of five concentric pentagons of corridors and offices, with the designation of "rings" and labeled "A" through "E." These rings are interconnected and enable employees to walk to other sections without ever going outside. Twenty-three thousand military and civilian employees work in the Pentagon.

Rebuilding

* The area of work covers the outer three rings of the Pentagon (E, D, and C) between Corridors 4 and 5.
* Approximately 400,000 square feet of space required complete structural demolition and reconstruction. Half of this area rests in the newly renovated Wedge 1 section of the Pentagon and the other half falls in the un-renovated Wedge 2.
* The Phoenix Project scope of work includes rebuilding the core and shell of Wedge 1 and the shell of Wedge 2.

Cost

* It will cost upwards of $700 million to recover the entire two million square feet damaged by the attack.
* About 2.1 million pounds of limestone were quarried and cut in southern Indiana before being sent to the Pentagon. The 3,700 stone pieces required for the effort are in place on the exterior of the building.
* As many as 1,000 workers, initially working three shifts, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, undertook project.

Milestones

* On June 11, the last piece of limestone was set into the Pentagon's western façade.
* A condolence book, a Presidential photo, and handmade sympathy cards written by children were included in a bronze box that was sealed into the limestone facade of the newly rebuilt section of the Pentagon.
* The capsule is not intended to be opened.

Completion

* The E-ring, the Pentagon's outer ring where the aircraft hit the building will be reoccupied on September 11, 2002.
* All of the areas damaged by the terrorist attack will be completely restored by Spring of 2003.

.............

For additional information about this project, contact:
Stacey S. Loizeaux, Member The Loizeaux Group, LLC
Controlled Demolition, Inc.
2737 Merryman’s Mill Road

Phoenix, Maryland 21131 USA

.......


oopsie


Pentagon reconstruction nicknamed 'the Phoenix Project'

controlled demolition incorporated helped with the 9-11 operation? (wtc and pentagon?)

Controlled Demolition Incorporated: company subcontracted by Tully Construction to remove the rubble from Ground Zero.

Controlled Demolition Inc. (CDI) was also contracted to dispose of the remains of the Oklahoma City bombing.

 

[RachelBibleStudent]

oh rly?

k......

nothing hit 7. why would it fall rachel?

it had a few tiny fires inside. they could have burned for a month without the building collapsing.


america is under attack, the Twin Towers are down....chaos abounds....but NYPD and Larry decide to PULL out and let 7 free fall.....

Larry makes the call with the FD on the very day America was under terror attack by Muslims.....to:

"the 'pulling' silverstein was talking about pulling the firefighting operation out of the building and just letting it collapse..."

i LOVE 9-11 reality deniers.
Larry said, pull it....that meant just let it defy the laws of physics for the 3rd time that day (even though nothing hit it)...and let it free fall JUST LIKE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

but it couldn't possibly have been a controlled demo.
mkay.
LOL.

building seven was hit by tons of burning debris...you can see the effects of that burning debris in the aerial photo from a few weeks later...building six had a huge hole literally ripped out of it...

and building seven had more than just a few small fires...i see you ignored the photo i posted of the -exposed- side of building seven...that shows smoke pouring out from pretty much the entire southern face of the building...

'pulling' in demolition terminology means to pull a building down with cables...if you had some pictures of people hooking cables between construction machines and the building that day you might have a legitimate argument for controlled demolition...