666 Mark of the Beast Tech is Ready to be Rolled Out

[NightTwister]

I think all three theories (pre, mid and post) have flaws. I guess we will have to wait and find out. I am hoping pre is correct.

I'm going with "pan-millennial." It'll all pan out in the end.

 

[Genipher]

If you had a RFID chip in each person then it would be simple to solve crime. Let's say a person was murdered no this street corner around 1am, we could immediately know who was in the vicinity at that time and see precisely when the victim was there and stopped moving and who was there at the same time. Likewise with bank robberies and so many more crimes. But if you add in the "no buying or selling" without this chip component, it would become that much harder to commit a crime. You can eliminate money laundry and you can eliminate people fencing stolen goods.

Also, using AI you could look for suspicious patterns, suppose everything this person has bought in the last two weeks could combine to make a bomb. Or suppose they bought a few thousand rounds of ammunition, and body armor. You could see potential terrorist attacks before they happen.

This would be a tremendous savings to all people, savings from theft, savings from court costs, hospital costs, legal costs.

But it gets better, if you put a chip in the brain so that the person becomes an extension of the AI the AI would become so much more powerful and effective. You could make it a requirement for all police officers. Really, it could enhance any profession. But with just the police force I could see a 20% reduction in manpower as a result of almost all crime being eliminated, But also you could require those that are still on the force to get the chip. Whatever any cop sees the AI would also see and could send those same images to other cops, likewise whatever they hear. Likewise with any image from a camera or drone could be beamed to the cop. As long as the cops can read and speak on a 5th grade level you would have a top notch police force.

But it gets better. Suppose others also get chipped wanting access to that super computer AI. Any person in the community that is chipped immediately becomes the eyes and ears of the police. As this takes off I could see no business wanting to hire someone who isn't chipped. You can imagine how much easier it would be to manage a work force that was chipped, you could probably eliminate managers, the AI would be the manager. Likewise with accountants, lawyers, and other white collar jobs. I could easily see those being cut by 50% at least. On the flip side we have a whole bunch of minimum wage jobs that are already being replaced by computers and robots. I would think that business owners and stock holders would love this, it cuts costs significantly and gives them much greater control over their staff. Also we have solved the problem of the poor education system in the US. In fact to be chipped you would probably just need to pass a fifth grade reading comprehension and listening comprehension exam. You could eliminate grades 6-12, college and grad school.

Except there will always be hackers manipulating even that system.
Can you imagine having your brain hacked?? 😬

 

[NightTwister]

Except there will always be hackers manipulating even that system.
Can you imagine having your brain hacked?? 😬

That happens every day with YouTube, TikTok, Cable News, etc.

 

[iamsoandso]

Here's one of the proponents for genocide talking about reducing humanity down to zero. He says Carbon, but there's no way to eliminate that key component of the life cycle. All life uses carbon based materials/ energy daily.

Bill (ted Bundy) Gates

That's a really old video I notice. There's no date affixed to it but at about the 2:50 point he says the current world population was 6.8 billion(so 2001-2008 time frame when the Bill and Malinda Gates foundation was pushing vaccines for aids,meningitis,ect.)...

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

That's a really old video I notice. There's no date affixed to it but at about the 2:50 point he says the current world population was 6.8 billion(so 2001-2008 time frame when the Bill and Malinda Gates foundation was pushing vaccines for aids,meningitis,ect.)...

He was referring to the future wasn't he?
He is still doing everything he can to reduce the population as did his parents who fostered in him their eugenics philosophy.
Many years ago vaccines were pushed on the black African nations. They did reduce population by causing miscarriages.

This was Kenya

Ever wonder why so many African presidents rejected the CV injections from entering their countries?

 

[iamsoandso]

He was referring to the future wasn't he?
He is still doing everything he can to reduce the population as did his parents who fostered in him their eugenics philosophy.
Many years ago vaccines were pushed on the black African nations. They did reduce population by causing miscarriages.

This was Kenya

Ever wonder why so many African presidents rejected the CV injections from entering their countries?

Nothing that I was saying meant that I endorse B.Gates in any of his endeavors(I'm not defending him,lol). Past that though the point of the worlds population being too large is evident. That doesn't mean I think the governments should perform any mass reductions either it will take place all by itself it already is. It's the same as if someone had an acre of land with five chickens on it all would be well. Now if he tried to put fifty chickens on the same one acre of land then inside a few months there wouldn't be a blade of grass,a bug or worm left. It's the same thing now that there are eight billion people on the earth because we cant make it any bigger so year after year there will be less and less trees,plants,cows,fish,chickens ect....People I think, think to themselves that they will eat squirrels, fish and wild edible plants if they had to but their forgetting that cows,squirrels,fish ect. are going to be eating up everything around them at the same time. Eventually there will be less and less people,cows,fish and grasshoppers eating things and so they'll all fit in the chicken pen again.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

Nothing that I was saying meant that I endorse B.Gates in any of his endeavors(I'm not defending him,lol). Past that though the point of the worlds population being too large is evident. That doesn't mean I think the governments should perform any mass reductions either it will take place all by itself it already is. It's the same as if someone had an acre of land with five chickens on it all would be well. Now if he tried to put fifty chickens on the same one acre of land then inside a few months there wouldn't be a blade of grass,a bug or worm left. It's the same thing now that there are eight billion people on the earth because we cant make it any bigger so year after year there will be less and less trees,plants,cows,fish,chickens ect....People I think, think to themselves that they will eat squirrels, fish and wild edible plants if they had to but their forgetting that cows,squirrels,fish ect. are going to be eating up everything around them at the same time. Eventually there will be less and less people,cows,fish and grasshoppers eating things and so they'll all fit in the chicken pen again.

Point take. I certainly don't think you're defending Gates. I just was responding to your time reference to the speech. I see now where you are coming from.

The globalists' plans are written in their books and journal publications. They are looking at it the way you describe, so they intend on exterminating us to put it frankly.
Regardless of the majority of land being uninhabited, yet habitable, IMHO, they are using this theory to justify the mass extermination. A NASA scientist acquaintance justified abortion and elder death . Her very elderly husband died and this young lady did shortly thereafter in a car wreck. She died just short of the cv19 rollout. Life is short my friend. Just trying to get as many to Heaven as possible before it's too late.

 

[Genipher]

Nothing that I was saying meant that I endorse B.Gates in any of his endeavors(I'm not defending him,lol). Past that though the point of the worlds population being too large is evident. That doesn't mean I think the governments should perform any mass reductions either it will take place all by itself it already is. It's the same as if someone had an acre of land with five chickens on it all would be well. Now if he tried to put fifty chickens on the same one acre of land then inside a few months there wouldn't be a blade of grass,a bug or worm left. It's the same thing now that there are eight billion people on the earth because we cant make it any bigger so year after year there will be less and less trees,plants,cows,fish,chickens ect....People I think, think to themselves that they will eat squirrels, fish and wild edible plants if they had to but their forgetting that cows,squirrels,fish ect. are going to be eating up everything around them at the same time. Eventually there will be less and less people,cows,fish and grasshoppers eating things and so they'll all fit in the chicken pen again.

Check out
overpopulationisamyth.com

There is plenty of land in the world for billions of people.

 

[GaryA]

I never heard that one. Lol 😄

That was my stance back when I was pre.
Even then I thought that the talk about us getting removed before there's any serious persecution was not Biblical. In communist and some Muslim countries like Sudan there's been persecution.

Also,
"Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. "

I was taught pre-trib rapture while a boy growing up - but, after personal study on the matter in my teens, I determined that it was not biblical. I have been post-trib ever since.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

Check out
overpopulationisamyth.com

There is plenty of land in the world for billions of people.

After the Lord cleanses and renews the earth, it will be home for the uncountable believers throughout history. That's far more than any estimate that overpopulation estimates. The oceans will be gone, which will add quite a lot of land mass, 2/3, but I think the Bible speaks to this through the Abrahamic covenant too..

BTW, I read the definition and history of the home page of that site...
Overpopulation Is A Myth
....and it's very well presented. It corresponds to the history I studied outside of school. We should all be aware of this considering the mainstream churches promoted Eugenics and Malthusian philosophy around the turn of the previous century up until WW1+2.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

I was taught pre-trib rapture while a boy growing up - but, after personal study on the matter in my teens, I determined that it was not biblical. I have been post-trib ever since.

Amen. Leave it to open minded teens to diligently search the scriptures to see whether those things are so.

I was persuaded by my first pastors after I got saved as a teen, to adopt pretrib rapture too . Reading the Bible and reasoning, I eventually changed my mind as well. In-between I was a bit of a pretrib prepper. That didn't go over well with my Evangelical and baptist friends. I can't speak for them, but it's never been an issue of contention for me.
I figured that people can do what they want. It can't hurt to prepare for anything else either, natural or manmade disasters.

 

[iamsoandso]

Point take. I certainly don't think you're defending Gates. I just was responding to your time reference to the speech. I see now where you are coming from.

The globalists' plans are written in their books and journal publications. They are looking at it the way you describe, so they intend on exterminating us to put it frankly.
Regardless of the majority of land being uninhabited, yet habitable, IMHO, they are using this theory to justify the mass extermination. A NASA scientist acquaintance justified abortion and elder death . Her very elderly husband died and this young lady did shortly thereafter in a car wreck. She died just short of the cv19 rollout. Life is short my friend. Just trying to get as many to Heaven as possible before it's too late.

My thoughts are more like Ezekiel 38:13 https://biblehub.com/ezekiel/38-13.htm where it says they come after the cows,corn ect. ,,,You know like in Revelation where war.FAMINE,pestilence ect. takes place... I think "well all the politicians and experts so called deny climate change,,,and then there's the Bible telling us there will come scorching days https://biblehub.com/interlinear/revelation/16-8.htm (me weighing the two sources in my hands...)...

 

[gb9]

Amen. Leave it to open minded teens to diligently search the scriptures to see whether those things are so.

I was persuaded by my first pastors after I got saved as a teen, to adopt pretrib rapture too . Reading the Bible and reasoning, I eventually changed my mind as well. In-between I was a bit of a pretrib prepper. That didn't go over well with my Evangelical and baptist friends. I can't speak for them, but it's never been an issue of contention for me.
I figured that people can do what they want. It can't hurt to prepare for anything else either, natural or manmade disasters.

yes, i see why people have pre, mid and post trib views.

i am not pretrib, but i also do not argue the point.

 

[iamsoandso]

Check out
overpopulationisamyth.com

There is plenty of land in the world for billions of people.

After the Lord cleanses and renews the earth, it will be home for the uncountable believers throughout history. That's far more than any estimate that overpopulation estimates. The oceans will be gone, which will add quite a lot of land mass, 2/3, but I think the Bible speaks to this through the Abrahamic covenant too..

BTW, I read the definition and history of the home page of that site...
Overpopulation Is A Myth
....and it's very well presented. It corresponds to the history I studied outside of school. We should all be aware of this considering the mainstream churches promoted Eugenics and Malthusian philosophy around the turn of the previous century up until WW1+2.

Myself the first thing I did was to search the web page to see what whoever it was,was saying about "ARABLE LAND" https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arable

Now I guess we could look at all the web pages on the WWW where somebody takes all the land mass on the planet earth and divides it by the current population https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/ and says "see they'll all fit" but in all reality what good is that? So then how much land mass is on the mountains where chickens and cows cant live? How much of the land is on the North Pole or South Pole? What is it like 33% of the land mass on Earth is "DESERT" ? So ARABLE LAND is actually what we need to look at(land where crops,farm animals ect. can live) if not well we could send a few billion people to live on Mars but either we have to send them food or they will die right?...

 

[ZNP]

yes, i see why people have pre, mid and post trib views.

i am not pretrib, but i also do not argue the point.

I subscribe to all 3

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

Myself the first thing I did was to search the web page to see what whoever it was,was saying about "ARABLE LAND" https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arable

Now I guess we could look at all the web pages on the WWW where somebody takes all the land mass on the planet earth and divides it by the current population https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/ and says "see they'll all fit" but in all reality what good is that? So then how much land mass is on the mountains where chickens and cows cant live? How much of the land is on the North Pole or South Pole? What is it like 33% of the land mass on Earth is "DESERT" ? So ARABLE LAND is actually what we need to look at(land where crops,farm animals ect. can live) if not well we could send a few billion people to live on Mars but either we have to send them food or they will die right?...

There are many different agricultural practices that theoretically would work depending on many factors. Theoretically because most are experiments or practices done on a small scale. Large scale agriculture is what's taught in colleges. They are funded by big ag and focused upon the established profit driven farming.
It has many drawbacks as it does benefits. Everything is a trade off.
A problem is that over 90% if the populations are dependent upon others for food production.


The whole malthusian philosophy was taught us in school. My early exposure was a Catholic English teacher who took us highschool students on a field trip to a grave yard for a writing assignment after we were told to lay on the ground in front of a headstone and write epitaphs and various things having to do with our fantasy of death of ourselves and others. Situational ethics followed with impossible scenarios like "The Lifeboat Game." There was an entire unit devoted to brainwashing children to not only accept but be willing to participate in death fantasy conversations.

In military science classes, the cadets are programed with other unrealistic impossible scenarios to program soldiers for the mass murder of unarmed allies.
I don't believe that anyone here is suggesting that. I do believe however that the globalists are not only suggesting that but also planning it.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

Check out
overpopulationisamyth.com

There is plenty of land in the world for billions of people.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

Myself the first thing I did was to search the web page to see what whoever it was,was saying about "ARABLE LAND" https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arable

Now I guess we could look at all the web pages on the WWW where somebody takes all the land mass on the planet earth and divides it by the current population https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/ and says "see they'll all fit" but in all reality what good is that? So then how much land mass is on the mountains where chickens and cows cant live? How much of the land is on the North Pole or South Pole? What is it like 33% of the land mass on Earth is "DESERT" ? So ARABLE LAND is actually what we need to look at(land where crops,farm animals ect. can live) if not well we could send a few billion people to live on Mars but either we have to send them food or they will die right?...

There's a whole lot of land suitable for farming in my state. Over 90% is unused for farming. There used to be thousands of farms, so it has been done.

 

[selahsays]

Well, selahsays, “don’t worry excessively about a physical mark; the mark will actually be spiritual.”

The most important thing is that we have the Seal of God in our forehead. To have the Seal of God in our forehead is simply to have the Word of God in our minds. It's interesting to note that the Greek word for "sealed" is “sphragizo,” which denotes marking or preservation.

And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree; but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads.

- Revelation 9:4 (KJV)

 

[selahsays]

continued . . .

The KJV translates Strong's G4972 in the following manner: seal (22x), set to (one's) seal (1x), stop (1x), seal up (1x), set a seal (1x), variations of 'seal' (1x).
Outline of Biblical Usage [?]

1. to set a seal upon, mark with a seal, to seal
   1. for security: from Satan
   2. since things sealed up are concealed (as the contents of a letter), to hide, keep in silence, keep secret
   3. in order to mark a person or a thing
      1. to set a mark upon by the impress of a seal or a stamp
      2. angels are said to be sealed by God
   4. in order to prove, confirm, or attest a thing
      1. to confirm authenticate, place beyond doubt
         1. of a written document
         2. to prove one's testimony to a person that he is what he professes to be

Strong’s Definitions [?](Strong’s Definitions Legend)
σφραγίζω sphragízō, sfrag-id'-zo; from G4973; to stamp (with a signet or private mark) for security or preservation (literally or figuratively); by implication, to keep secret, to attest:—(set a, set to) seal up, stop.
Thayer's Greek Lexicon [?](Jump to Scripture Index)
STRONGS G4972:
σφραγίζω (Revelation 7:3 Rec.st); 1 aorist ἐσφραγισα; 1 aorist middle participle σφραγισάμενος; passive, perfect participle ἐσφραγισμενος; 1 aorist ἐσφραγίσθην; (in 2 Corinthians 11:10 Rec.st gives the form σφραγίσεται de coniectura vel errore (Tdf.; see his note at the passage)); (σφραγίς, which see); the Sept. for חָתַם; to set a seal upon, mark with a seal, to seal;
a. for security: τί, Matthew 27:66; namely, τήν ἄβυσσον, to close it, lest Satan after being cast into it should come out; hence, the addition ἐπάνω αὐτοῦ, over him i. e. Satan, Revelation 20:3 (ἐν ᾧ —i. e. δώματι —κεραυνός ἐστιν

blueletterbible.org