-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
K
Come on Kim you guys beat Trump up with much less actual info and with a thousand times more unfairness, based on what ever nonsense the MSM and Hillary campaign make-up ...
I must admit its kinda nice seeing you have to defend Bernie instead of accusing a good man like Trump
I must admit its kinda nice seeing you have to defend Bernie instead of accusing a good man like Trump
I've defended Trump several times. When the shoe doesn't fit, I say so. When it does... well... I believe it to be utter propaganda to make accusations, even to Trump, but not have any evidence. The unfortunate thing is, for Trump, is that there is way too much evidence because he loves social media.
M
Give me one example of my accusing or beating Trump up over something that isn't true and/or no evidence to support it.
I've defended Trump several times. When the shoe doesn't fit, I say so. When it does... well... I believe it to be utter propaganda to make accusations, even to Trump, but not have any evidence. The unfortunate thing is, for Trump, is that there is way too much evidence because he loves social media.
I've defended Trump several times. When the shoe doesn't fit, I say so. When it does... well... I believe it to be utter propaganda to make accusations, even to Trump, but not have any evidence. The unfortunate thing is, for Trump, is that there is way too much evidence because he loves social media.
K
Yes, lets lash the only candidate who was against going into the middle east, thereby destabilizing it and creating terrorists groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS. As far as I'm concerned, Trump almost had it right when he said Hillary and Obama are the founders of ISIS... they are enablers, but the founder is Bush.
And for the record, Trump is a liar when he says he was always against going into Iraq. I'd post the video/audio of him saying Bush made the right decision but you'll probably say Hillary and/or Obama edited it with the help of the main stream media.
And for the record, Trump is a liar when he says he was always against going into Iraq. I'd post the video/audio of him saying Bush made the right decision but you'll probably say Hillary and/or Obama edited it with the help of the main stream media.
M
Yes, lets lash the only candidate who was against going into the middle east, thereby destabilizing it and creating terrorists groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS. As far as I'm concerned, Trump almost had it right when he said Hillary and Obama are the founders of ISIS... they are enablers, but the founder is Bush.
And for the record, Trump is a liar when he says he was always against going into Iraq. I'd post the video/audio of him saying Bush made the right decision but you'll probably say Hillary and/or Obama edited it with the help of the main stream media.
And for the record, Trump is a liar when he says he was always against going into Iraq. I'd post the video/audio of him saying Bush made the right decision but you'll probably say Hillary and/or Obama edited it with the help of the main stream media.
K
Was? I think you mean to say "is currently" against the war. This wasn't even a partisan thing as both Democrats and Republicans were for it. Even Trump is on the record stating he was for it.
Is it accurate to say that Trump was initially for it, but then later flip-flopped (as he has on almost every major issue) to being against it?
Is it accurate to say that Trump was initially for it, but then later flip-flopped (as he has on almost every major issue) to being against it?
Let me help you.
She believes in abortion.
Same sex marriage.
Abolishment of the 2nd amendment.
One world government.
One world religion.
Restriction of freedom of speech.
Mandatory vaccinations of people.
The intellectual elite need to tell and indeed force people to bend to their will, which includes her.
Islam is a peaceful religion.
Whites are probably the most wicked people on the face of the earth.
Lying is acceptable to further ones ends.
Socialism.
America being apologetic to the world for its past "wrongs."
Let me know how you think about these. I am curious.
She believes in abortion.
Same sex marriage.
Abolishment of the 2nd amendment.
One world government.
One world religion.
Restriction of freedom of speech.
Mandatory vaccinations of people.
The intellectual elite need to tell and indeed force people to bend to their will, which includes her.
Islam is a peaceful religion.
Whites are probably the most wicked people on the face of the earth.
Lying is acceptable to further ones ends.
Socialism.
America being apologetic to the world for its past "wrongs."
Let me know how you think about these. I am curious.
K
I disagree with the bold ones.
** It depends on the restrictions (can't use speech to threaten someone). It depends on the vaccination (if it's HPV, heck yes, make it mandatory). I am for some socialistic institutions (fire, police, education, etc...).
I do agree that when someone makes a mistake, we own up to it. So the only thing I unconditionally agree with is apologizing for past sins such as: slavery, anti-women suffrage, anti-interracial marriages, putting Japanese Americans in camps, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent Japanese civilians with nuclear weapons, destabilizing the middle east, etc...
** It depends on the restrictions (can't use speech to threaten someone). It depends on the vaccination (if it's HPV, heck yes, make it mandatory). I am for some socialistic institutions (fire, police, education, etc...).
I do agree that when someone makes a mistake, we own up to it. So the only thing I unconditionally agree with is apologizing for past sins such as: slavery, anti-women suffrage, anti-interracial marriages, putting Japanese Americans in camps, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent Japanese civilians with nuclear weapons, destabilizing the middle east, etc...