Oh sorry for not wanting to give up the rest of my life because of an some random birth defect. I mean yeah screw anything the parents ever had planned. They should totally just work and slave and devote every cent to a child that might not even have a functioning enough brain to realize what people are giving up for it. Im sure someone out their would love to raise that child. It isn't me though.
California Churches Forced to Provide Abortion Coverage
- Thread starter crossnote
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You should be thankful that Jesus gave up His comforts, just for some random birth defects (called sin) in you. Yeah why He suffered and died for an ingrate as you, who can't figure out sacrificial love is beyond me. Well, it's a good thing He didn't leave you on someone else's doorstep to cover for your sin.
I would be interested to find out whether the insurance these companies offer is insurance levied against their own profits or whether the insurance is provided by a third party. It is, in my eyes, the right of any employee in any company to be able to acquire for himself or herself insurance which is comprehensive and covers all possible medical eventualities.
An employee should be able to choose the extent of their coverage without interference from the employer. Refusing employees a right to full coverage is in itself morally wrong, but specific to this context, if a church refuses full coverage, the shortfall of which is coverage for abortion by virtue that it is a sin, then surely coverage for a premarital pregnancy and birthing should also be disallowed.
It's so alien to me because here we have free healthcare that covers all non-cosmetic eventualities, and some necessary cosmetic ones. It would be outrageous for an employer to suddenly dictate what medical coverages any employee can or cannot have or pay for. Employers here have absolutely no part in that.
An employee should be able to choose the extent of their coverage without interference from the employer. Refusing employees a right to full coverage is in itself morally wrong, but specific to this context, if a church refuses full coverage, the shortfall of which is coverage for abortion by virtue that it is a sin, then surely coverage for a premarital pregnancy and birthing should also be disallowed.
It's so alien to me because here we have free healthcare that covers all non-cosmetic eventualities, and some necessary cosmetic ones. It would be outrageous for an employer to suddenly dictate what medical coverages any employee can or cannot have or pay for. Employers here have absolutely no part in that.