D
Leaving Clinton out of it, I agree that fake news should be dealt with.
Im not talking about real news which people don't want to get out, that
would be censorship.
Im talking of news which is deliberately made up to look as if it is real. Usually it gets
posted on social media sites face book etc. Also some newspapers don't seem to have
any morals in this respect.
Most fake news is eventually exposed but in the meantime it can cause a lot of
damage.
Im surprised there are not more legal cases and law suits over it. I suppose this will
be the next step.
Im not talking about real news which people don't want to get out, that
would be censorship.
Im talking of news which is deliberately made up to look as if it is real. Usually it gets
posted on social media sites face book etc. Also some newspapers don't seem to have
any morals in this respect.
Most fake news is eventually exposed but in the meantime it can cause a lot of
damage.
Im surprised there are not more legal cases and law suits over it. I suppose this will
be the next step.
From 1945- February 27, 1968, they actually went unbiased.
On that date, Walter Cronkite opined about the Vietnam war and the gloves were off again.
So, in the case of the US, fake stories are protected by the First Amendment too.