~Concerned Citizens~

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Bingo

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2019
2,378
1,789
113
#21
Dhimmitude

The word "Dhimmitude" is found in the new health care bill; so what does it mean?
Thought this was interesting and worth passing on.
Obama used it in the health care bill.
Now isn't this interesting?
It is also included in the health care law.
Dhimmitude -- I had never heard the word until now. I typed it into Google and started reading. Pretty interesting. It's on page 107 of the healthcare bill. I looked this up
on Google and yep, it exists. It is a REAL word.
Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-Muslim populations conquered through jihad (Holy War). Specifically, it is the TAXING
of non-Muslims in exchange for tolerating their presence AND as a coercive means of converting conquered remnants to Islam.
Obamacare allows the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia Muslim diktat in the United States .
Muslims are specifically exempted from the government
mandate to purchase insurance, and also from the penalty
tax for being uninsured. Islam considers insurance to be
"gambling", "risk-taking", and "usury" and is thus banned.
Muslims are specifically granted exemption based on
this.


How convenient. So I, as a Christian, will have crippling IRS liens placed against all of my assets, including real estate, cattle, and even accounts receivable,
and will face hard prison time because I refuse to buy insurance or pay the penalty tax.

Meanwhile, Louis Farrakhan (the Muslim) will have no such penalty and will have 100% of his health insurance needs paid for by the de facto government insurance.
Non-Muslims will be paying a tax to subsidize Muslims. This is Dhimmitude.


All American citizens need to know about it !!
snopes.com:
Health Insurance Exemptions Apr 13, 2010 ... Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-muslim populations
The Obamacare bill is the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia ...
http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/exemptionsasp


Keep this going. Every non-Muslim in the United States of America needs to know about it

( date archive resource )
flag - Copy.gif








































































































































































 

calibob

Sinner saved by grace
May 29, 2018
7,164
4,841
113
65
lawton ok
#22
FYI; A friend of mine who's parents were Black Muslims, got saved. She told me Screwy Louie Farrakhan wasn't even a real Muslim. That his party was no better than the KKK. Pure racists. Even worse than the more traditional Islam followers. That when Malcom X returned from Mecca he changed his tune and Farrakhan's thugs murdered him. Hearsay yes, but still believable.
 

Bingo

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2019
2,378
1,789
113
#23
FYI; A friend of mine who's parents were Black Muslims, got saved. She told me Screwy Louie Farrakhan wasn't even a real Muslim. That his party was no better than the KKK. Pure racists. Even worse than the more traditional Islam followers. That when Malcom X returned from Mecca he changed his tune and Farrakhan's thugs murdered him. Hearsay yes, but still believable.
flag - Copy.gif 0e2634_281b587cd5844b7799f02241532330ce~mv2 - Copy (2) - Copy.jpg
 

Bingo

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2019
2,378
1,789
113
#24
rwbstr10.jpg
"The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. . . . If we move in mass, be it ever so circuitously, we shall attain our object; but if we break into squads, every one pursuing the path he thinks most direct, we become an easy conquest to those who can now barely hold us in check.I repeat again, that we ought not to schismatize on either men or measures. Principles alone can justify that. If we find our government in all its branches rushing headlong, like our predecessors, into the arms of monarchy, if we find them violating our dearest rights, the trial by jury, the freedom of the press, the freedom of opinion, civil or religious, or opening on our peace of mind or personal safety the sluices of terrorism, if we see them raising standing armies, when the absence of all other danger points to these as the sole objects on which they are to be employed, then indeed let us withdraw and call the nation to its tents. But while our functionaries are wise, and honest, and vigilant, let us move compactly under their guidance, and we have nothing to fear. Things may here and there go a little wrong. It is not in their power to prevent it. But all will be right in the end, though not perhaps by the shortest means." -- Thomas Jefferson to Colonel Wm. Duane, 1811

For two centuries of unexampled social, civil, and material advancement, in which it has been the controlling force, the Constitution has applied itself, adapted itself, developed itself, amended itself, and, through the stress and shock of civil and foreign wars the like of which no other constitution ever felt, it has maintained its equilibrium. The American citizen has reason to believe that his fundamental law contains inherently what the Scriptures call "the power of an endless life."

As the Nation enters the new Millennium the only danger seen is that which has always plagued nations, dishonest power hungry influence peddling politicians and bureaucrats whose influence is bought by the special interests,dishonest men who have, with impunity, forgotten they have taken a Sacred Oath to Defend the Constitution and the Nation against ALL enemies, Foreign and Domestic.

Against this danger, as ever, the Ultimate Defense of the Nation and the Constitution, as a Freedom Loving People and Sovereign Citizens, is entirely dependent on the resolve, the dedication and the faith of

We the People of the United States
rwbstr10.jpg
flag - Copy.gif

( archive data resource )
 

Bingo

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2019
2,378
1,789
113
#25
rwbstr10.jpg
[A very Interesting Perspective by Catholic Bishop ex-Fighter Pilot Robert Bowman, who flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam. He is presently (since 1998) bishop of the United Catholic Church in Melbourne Beach, FL. Originally printed in The National Catholic Reporter, Oct. 2, 1998.]

If deceptions about terrorism go unchallenged, then the threat will continue until it destroys us.

The truth is that none of our thousands of nuclear weapons can protect us from these threats. No Star Wars system no matter how technically advanced, no matter how many trillions of dollars are poured into it, can protect us from a nuclear weapon delivered in a sailboat or a Cessna or a suitcase or a Ryder rental truck. Not one weapon in our vast arsenal, not a penny of the $270 billion a year we spend on so-called defense can defend against a terrorist bomb. That is a military fact.

As a retired lieutenant colonel and a frequent lecturer on national security issues, I have often quoted Psalm 33: "A king is not saved by his mighty army. A warrior is not saved by his great strength." The obvious reaction is, "Then what can we do?" Is there nothing we can do to provide security for our people?"

There is. But to understand it requires that we know the truth about the threat. President Clinton did not tell the American people the truth about why we are the targets of terrorism when he explained why we bombed Afghanistan and Sudan. He said that we are a target because we stand for democracy, freedom, and human rights in the world. Nonsense!

We are the target of terrorists because, in much of the world, our government stands for dictatorship, bondage, and human exploitation. We are the target of terrorists because we are hated. And we are hated because our government has done hateful things.

In how many countries have agents of our government deposed popularly elected leaders and replaced them with puppet military dictators who were willing to sell out their own people to American multinational corporations?

We did it in Iran when the US Marines and the CIA deposed Mossadegh because he wanted to nationalize the oil industry. We replaced him with the Shah and armed, trained, and paid his hated Savak National Guard, which enslaved and brutalized the people of Iran, all to protect the financial interests of our oil companies. Is it any wonder that there are people in Iran who hate us?

What about Japan? We did it in Chile. We did it in Vietnam. More recently, we tried to do it in Iraq.

And, of course, how many times have we done it in Nicaragua and all the other banana republics of Latin America? Time after time we have ousted popular leaders who wanted the riches of the land to be shared by the people who worked it. We replaced them with murderous tyrants who would sell out their own people so the wealth of the land could be taken out by the likes of Domino Sugar, Folgers, and Chiquita Banana.

In country after country, our government has thwarted democracy, stifled freedom, and trampled human rights. That's why it is hated around the world. And that's why we're the target of terrorists.

People in Canada enjoy democracy, freedom, and human rights. So do the people of Norway and Sweden. Have you heard of Canadian embassies being bombed? Or Norwegian, or Swedish?

We are not hated because we practice democracy, value freedom, or uphold human rights. We are hated because our government denies these things to people in Third World countries whose resources are coveted by our multinational corporations. That hatred we have sown has come back to haunt us in the form of terrorism and in the future, nuclear terrorism.

Once the truth about why the threat exists is understood, the solution becomes obvious. We must change our ways. Getting rid of our nuclear weapons unilaterally if necessary will enhance our security. Drastically altering our foreign policy will ensure it.

Instead of sending our sons and daughters around the world to kill Arabs so we can have the oil under their sand, we should send them to rebuild their infrastructure, supply clean water, and feed starving children. Instead of continuing to kill hundreds of Iraqi children every day with our sanctions, we should help Iraqis rebuild their electric power plants, their water treatment facilities, their hospitals, and all the things we have destroyed and prevented them from rebuilding.

Instead of training terrorists and death squads, we should close the School of the Americas [Ft. Benning, GA.]. Instead of supporting insurrection, destabilization, assassination, and terror around the world, we should abolish the CIA and give money to relief agencies.

In short, we should do good instead of evil. Who would try to stop us? Who would hate us? Who would want to bomb us? That is the truth the American people need to hear. We need to "respond" NOT "react".

God Bless
Bishop Bowman

rwbstr10.jpg
flag - Copy.gif


(This history is compiled from various governmental and other public domain sources.
November 2000 )









 

kaylagrl

Senior Member
Oct 18, 2014
14,232
2,156
113
#26
Both sides are filled with criminals! Bush, Ford, And Nixon just to name a few. The CIA is officially a criminal organization. And lets not leave Reagan off of the hook for Iran/Contra or taking from social security retirement in order to reduce taxes. He was obviously on the side of bankers When the Idea of IRA and 401K accounts were made public. Maybe even the side of the Federal Reserve Bank. I see no environmentalists on your list of so called good republicans. Both sides are evil as well as the polarization of Americans to join one or the other side is working while the Devil is laughing!

I boycott both parties and only vote on the issues now. Why do you think most people don't vote any more? It's because they have lost faith that our individual votes count any more!

Late term abortion, now infanticide, socialism, transgender bathrooms, no God in their platform (actually booed God) free healthcare for immigrants and will not recognize Jerusalem as the capitol. Just a few reasons I'd never vote for Dems, and no Christian ever should. Reps have their issues, but Dems have done lost their minds. Right now their party is being run by 4 brainless, self centered, harpy woman. Pelosi might as well sit down and shut up. Omar, we're not even sure if that is her real name, has called for BDS, boycott,divest,sanction Israel.Now she and that mind-numbingly silly idiot AOC want to "visit" Israel. The next election is crucial and I'm preaching to everyone who will listen, DO NOT put Dems in the WH. If you do we will be the next Venezuela. Put simply, the Dems positions right now are Godless. Any Christian with a conscience would never vote them into office. Yes, I said that.
 

kaylagrl

Senior Member
Oct 18, 2014
14,232
2,156
113
#27
FYI; A friend of mine who's parents were Black Muslims, got saved. She told me Screwy Louie Farrakhan wasn't even a real Muslim. That his party was no better than the KKK. Pure racists. Even worse than the more traditional Islam followers. That when Malcom X returned from Mecca he changed his tune and Farrakhan's thugs murdered him. Hearsay yes, but still believable.

Farrakhan is a rabid racist and anti-Jew.If you want to be amazed look up the politicians and Hollywood people who have had their pic taken with him. Tell you all you need to know. Obama, cough.
 

Bingo

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2019
2,378
1,789
113
#29
An Essay on the Constitution
rwbstr10.jpg

By LYSANDER SPOONER spooner.jpg

No Treason - The Constitution of No Authority
[This essay was written in 1869 during "Reconstruction" after the Civil War.]


I.
The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation. It has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between man and man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between persons now existing. It purports, at most, to be only a contract between persons living eighty years ago. And it can be supposed to have been a contract then only between persons who had already come to years of discretion, so as to be competent to make reasonable and obligatory contracts. Furthermore, we know, historically, that only a small portion even of the people then existing were consulted on the subject, or asked, or permitted to express either their consent or dissent in any formal manner. Those persons, if any, who did give their consent formally, are all dead now. Most of them have been dead forty, fifty, sixty, or seventy years. and the constitution, so far as it was their contract, died with them. They had no natural power or right to make it obligatory upon their children. It is not only plainly impossible, in the nature of things, that they could bind their posterity, but they did not even attempt to bind them. That is to say, the instrument does not purport to be an agreement between any body but "the people" THEN existing; nor does it, either expressly or impliedly, assert any right, power, or disposition, on their part, to bind anybody but themselves. Let us see. Its language is:


We, the people of the United States (that is, the people THEN EXISTING in the United States), in order to form a more perfect union, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves AND OUR POSTERITY, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

It is plain, in the first place, that this language, AS AN AGREEMENT, purports to be only what it at most really was, viz., a contract between the people then existing; and, of necessity, binding, as a contract, only upon those then existing. In the second place, the language neither expresses nor implies that they had any right or power, to bind their "posterity" to live under it. It does not say that their "posterity" will, shall, or must live under it. It only says, in effect, that their hopes and motives in adopting it were that it might prove useful to their posterity, as well as to themselves, by promoting their union, safety, tranquility, liberty, etc.

rwbstr10.jpg
flag - Copy.gif


'Articles in this thread are compiled from various governmental and other public domain sources.'
Intended solely as informative and subjects to reflect on as...'concerned citizens'
 

oldethennew

Senior Member
Feb 28, 2016
9,685
1,942
113
#30
'Fear God and Keep His Commandments, for this is the WHOLE-DUTY of man'...
 

oldethennew

Senior Member
Feb 28, 2016
9,685
1,942
113
#31
Love you Brother Bingo - keep it going on precious one...
 

calibob

Sinner saved by grace
May 29, 2018
7,164
4,841
113
65
lawton ok
#33
Late term abortion, now infanticide, socialism, transgender bathrooms, no God in their platform (actually booed God) free healthcare for immigrants and will not recognize Jerusalem as the capitol. Just a few reasons I'd never vote for Dems, and no Christian ever should. Reps have their issues, but Dems have done lost their minds. Right now their party is being run by 4 brainless, self centered, harpy woman. Pelosi might as well sit down and shut up. Omar, we're not even sure if that is her real name, has called for BDS, boycott,divest,sanction Israel.Now she and that mind-numbingly silly idiot AOC want to "visit" Israel. The next election is crucial and I'm preaching to everyone who will listen, DO NOT put Dems in the WH. If you do we will be the next Venezuela. Put simply, the Dems positions right now are Godless. Any Christian with a conscience would never vote them into office. Yes, I said that.
I only vote on issues not for people. I'm not on ethier committee that decides who will run or who wins or loses. I've watched good men die while evil men triumphed and cased many more to suffer or die. I'll never forget that Eisenhauer, Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon ran a war without congressional approval or the Nixon collaborated with the puppet dictator of South Viet Nam until after the US Federal election of 68 to boycott the peace talks just like Ollie North did for Reagan in 1980 and supplied the contras with Communist made guns.

All it took to end Viet Nam was a president willing to defy the military industrial complex and stop wasting money on whats none of our business. His name was Ford. Ford had a better Idea!
 

Bingo

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2019
2,378
1,789
113
#34
The direct simplicity and wisdom of Ronald Reagan lives on in his many memorable quotes:
rwbstr10.jpg
"Here's my strategy on the Cold War: We win, they lose.""The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.""The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so."
"Of the four wars in my lifetime none came about because the U.S. was too strong."
"I have wondered at times about what the Ten Commandment's would have looked like if Moses had run them through the U.S. Congress."
"The taxpayer: That's someone who works for the federal government but doesn't have to take the civil service examination."
"Government is like a baby: An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other."
"If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under."
"The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program."
"I've laid down the law, though, to everyone from now on about anything that happens: no matter what time it is, wake me, even if it's in the middle of a Cabinet meeting."
"Politics is not a bad profession. If you succeed there are many rewards, if you disgrace yourself you can always write a book."
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first."
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
"No arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.
"Let us show that we stand for fiscal integrity and sound money and above all for an end to deficit spending, with ultimate retirement of the national debt. Let us also include a permanent limit on the percentage of the people's earnings government can take without their consent. Let our banner proclaim a genuine tax reform... Let us explore ways to ward off socialism, not by increasing government's coercive power, but by increasing participation by the people in the ownership of our industrial machine... And we must make it plain to international adventurers that our love of peace stops short of 'peace at any price.' We will maintain whatever level of strength is necessary to preserve our free way of life. ... I do not believe I have proposed anything that is contrary to what has been considered Republican principle. It is at the same time the very basis of conservatism. It is time to reassert that principle and raise it to full view. And if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way." —Ronald Reagan


rwbstr10.jpg
flag - Copy.gif

( 'Articles in this thread are compiled from various governmental and other public domain sources.'
Intended solely as informative and subjects to reflect on as...( 'concerned citizens' )
 

Attachments

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
783
113
#35
Ah yes Ronnie Reagan. The man who started the class war by codifying income inequality.
 

Bingo

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2019
2,378
1,789
113
#36
rwbstr10.jpg
Well over 56 million innocent civilians have been murdered, and billions have been "neutralized" in fear of
brutalization by their governments this last century as a result of "Gun Control" laws..
Are you considering backing gun control laws? Do you think that because you may not own a gun, the rights

guaranteed by the Second Amendment don't matter?
CONSIDER THIS... This is just part of the known tally ...
In 1929 the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, approximately 20 million dissidents,

unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915-1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend

themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals,

the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend

themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend

themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend

themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million "educated" people, unable to

defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
That places total victims who lost their lives because of gun control at approximately 56 million in the last

century. Since we should learn from the mistakes of history, the next time someone talks in favor of gun
control, find out which group of citizens they wish to have exterminated.
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced to surrender 640,381 personal

firearms to be destroyed, a program costing the government more than $500 million dollars. The results
Australia-wide;
Homicides are up 3.2%,
Assaults are up 8%,
and Armed robberies are up 44%.
In that country's state of Victoria, homicides with firearms are up 300%.
Over the previous 25 years, statistics had shown a steady decrease in armed robberies and Australian

politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no improvement in "safety" has been observed after
such monumental effort and expense was successfully expended in "ridding society of guns."
It's time to state it plainly; guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-

control laws only affect the law-abiding citizens. Take action before it's too late, write or call your State
and Federal Representatives and Senators.
It ain't about controlling guns in the hands of criminals, folks, it is about CONTROL of you and me by the

REAL CRIMINALS - The International Oligarchy!! ULTIMATE CONTROL!!
Defend Liberty and the Constitution for the United States of America and the Second Article of Amendment!

Your very life depends on it!!!
rwbstr10.jpg
flag - Copy.gif


( 'Articles in this thread are compiled from various governmental and other public domain sources.'
Intended solely as informative and subjects to reflect on as...'concerned citizens' )





 

calibob

Sinner saved by grace
May 29, 2018
7,164
4,841
113
65
lawton ok
#37
Automatic weapons -- banned. Two federal laws have essentially banned them in the United States. One law in 1935 all but banned automatic weapons like the Tommy gun. And another in 1986 prohibited fully automatic weapons, except for pre-existing weapons (like pre 1899 Gatlin guns) that were grandfathered in.

Not all gun control is bad. Untrained, unlicensed citizens have been banned from having military grade weapons like full auto "Tommy Guns", Shotguns with barrels shorter than 18" and full auto hand guns since the 1930's before even the last 4 presidents were born. They didn't have guns in the days of Matthew, Mark, Luke or John. They had swords and the Lord did say there would come a time to sell our cloaks and buy one.
 

Bingo

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2019
2,378
1,789
113
#38
"Sharing a 'facebook post'.......may God have mercy on the hate filled political 'arena'!"
2dyWDma - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy (18) - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy - Co...jpg 2dyWDma - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy (19) - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy - Co...jpg


flag - Copy.gif
 

calibob

Sinner saved by grace
May 29, 2018
7,164
4,841
113
65
lawton ok
#39
"Sharing a 'facebook post'.......may God have mercy on the hate filled political 'arena'!"
View attachment 201885 View attachment 201886


View attachment 201887
The Democratic Party isn't democratic at all! They are bought and paid for by corporate pack funds, just the same as the republicans are. And as far as respecting the Commander In Chief goes. I was in the military when Nixon was president and even though I signed a contract and swore an oath on my life to protect and defend the Constitution, that didn't stop me from cheering when Nixon resigned.

BTW, Obama was a pile of :poop: too! One of the greatest thing about the Constitution is that by law it can be amended as times change. It is not the 10 Commandments and was not written by God. Aaron Burr did the right thing when dueling was legal.
 

calibob

Sinner saved by grace
May 29, 2018
7,164
4,841
113
65
lawton ok
#40
This is not a kingdom, thank God. We have the right of freedom of speech. Not to advocate crime or commit slander or to overthrow constitutional law and due process. The President works for us and if he becomes too disabled or incompetent he can be relieved of duty. It is not mutiny, rather it is true patriotism. (25th amendment)

In the case of High Crimes and misdemeanors he can be impeached also. If it were a case of Treason with a seddionist or a foreign power or enemy I would vote for hanging just like the Lincoln assignation conspirators were. No President is above the law of the Democratic Republic that he (or She maybe someday,) is duty bound to serve.