Pave way for large corporates to control every aspect of the internet.
Prices set to soar.
U.S. appeals court kills net neutrality
Prices set to soar.
U.S. appeals court kills net neutrality
Conservative Activist Judges end Net Neutrality in the US
- Thread starter David_1
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
This was not activist judges. The Judge in question agreed with Net Neutrality. The problem was that according to the Law, the FCC does not have the legal right to make law. It can set regulations, but not create law. Net Neutrality entered the realm of Law and thus lost the case. We the people, need to call our congressmen and senators that they place a bill before Congress that reinstates the Net Neutrality law.
the FCC has every right to regulate communications.
ISP's are not information providers. they are telecommunications corporations.
as soon as the FCC reclassifies ISP's as communication network providers - because that's what they really are - the appeals court ruling will be moot. the ruling rests on ISP's being classified as information services, and that the FCC does not have the same jurisdictional rights to regulate information as it does to regulate communication.
think about that for a minute -- this ruling rests on the premise that Verizon isn't a telcom corporation.
bogus, isn't it?
but the FCC back in the 80's or something classified ISP's as information services. this was before actual telecommunications services started offering web access.
ISP's are not information providers. they are telecommunications corporations.
as soon as the FCC reclassifies ISP's as communication network providers - because that's what they really are - the appeals court ruling will be moot. the ruling rests on ISP's being classified as information services, and that the FCC does not have the same jurisdictional rights to regulate information as it does to regulate communication.
think about that for a minute -- this ruling rests on the premise that Verizon isn't a telcom corporation.
bogus, isn't it?
but the FCC back in the 80's or something classified ISP's as information services. this was before actual telecommunications services started offering web access.