That's a point Esanta; however, let's not forget that Jihad is built into the very fabric of the false Islamic religious worldview.
But jihad is not built into the very fabric of Western political thought.
Muslims will always engage in Jihad until the end of this age. Even if everyone in the West migrated to another planet, Muslim sects will continue to engage in endless Jihad with each other attempting to genocidally destroy each other as they presently do.
Why? Because Jihad is a fundamental construct of Islam.
So not only can you not reasonably equate Islam with Western political thought as Jihad is not embedded in Western political thought but is in Islam, you cannot assert that Muslims will cease engaging in a behavior that is part of the very fabric of their false religious cult.
So while both sides may share some culpability for the present situation, Muslims will always engage in Jihad. It's in the very fabric of their false religious system.
Okay, fair enough, yes, violent 'Jihad' is, in this present day and age, a component of particular Muslim thought, but only for some Muslims - while others view Jihad as a personal struggle against sinful desire - and our engagement in what you might call 'anti-terrorism' can be deceptively painted by those violent Jihadists as a war on
all Muslim people, much like the Jihad can be painted as a war on
all Westerners. So you see, we should be careful about generalizing like that, because it is deceptive.
Let me quote Osama Bin Laden, to show you just how both sides say strikingly similar things.
''Peace be upon any who should follow this guidance: People of America, this talk of mine is for you and concerns the ideal way to prevent another Manhattan, and deals with the war and its causes and results. Before I begin, I say to you that security is an indispensable pillar of human life and that free men do not forfeit their security, contrary to Bush's claim that we hate freedom.
If so (as Bush says), then let him explain to us why we don't strike for example - Sweden? We know that freedom-haters don't possess defiant spirits like those of the 19 - may Allah have mercy on them. No, we fight because we are free men who don't sleep under oppression. We want to restore freedom to our nation. Just as you lay waste to our nation, so shall we lay waste to yours.
No one except a dumb thief plays with the security of others and then makes himself believe he will be secure. Whereas thinking people, when disaster strikes, make it their priority to look for its causes, in order to prevent it happening again. But I am amazed at you. Even though we are in the fourth year after the events of September 11th, Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the real causes. And thus, the reasons are still there, cause for a repeat of what occurred.
So I shall talk to you about the story behind those events and shall tell you truthfully about the moments in which the decision was taken, for you to consider. I say to you, Allah knows that it had never occurred to us to strike the towers. But after it became unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind.
The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were killed and injured and others were terrorised and displaced. I couldn't forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their occupants and high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining down on our home without mercy. The situation was like a crocodile meeting a helpless child, powerless except for his screams. Does the crocodile understand a conversation that doesn't include a weapon? And the whole world saw and heard but it didn't respond.
In those difficult moments many hard-to-describe ideas bubbled in my soul, but in the end they produced an intense feeling of rejection of tyranny, and gave birth to a strong resolve to punish the oppressors. And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America in order that they may taste some of what we tasted, so that they may be deterred from killing our women and children.
That day, it was confirmed to me that oppression and the intentional killing of innocent women and children is a deliberate American policy. Destruction is called freedom and democracy, while resistance is called terrorism and intolerance.''
Now, tell me you don't see any parallels between what Osama Bin Laden says - 'we must protect our people, we are fighting oppression, we are counter-striking, not instigating' - and what Western politicians and governments say. And I believe both may
think that's what they're doing, but when we have two sides, with generations of children growing up indoctrinated to understand who is 'the enemy' and who is 'right' and who is 'wrong', we have nothing but a recipe for perpetual war, AgeOfKnowledge.
Osama Bin Laden was definitely a man bent on hurting the West after Lebanon, but he also genuinely seems to believe that he was justified to repay America for what happened to his friends and family, much like many Westerners feel justified to repay 9/11 and other attacks. Before 1982, Bin Laden was a builder, a well-respected member of a British construction firm who headed up operations in his country, well liked by his friends and admired by the citizens.
Of course, none of this is justification at all, no more than 'our' actions - butchering hundreds of thousands - can be justified. I cannot rightly use the argument 'they mean to kill', or 'they are killers of innocents', or 'killing innocents is part of their code', to condone 'our' actions when killing innocents doesn't seem to be a problem for 'us' either.
Don't you see?