Examples of How You Cannot Believe "Everything" You Hear on the Internet..

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Aidan1

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2021
1,221
548
113
#21
The problem is there are so many lies, half truths, and psyops going on, I cannot dismiss out of hand any “conspiracies”.

The one about the vaccinated being a danger to the unvaccinated for instance.

I don’t know if it’s true or not, but it’s certainly plausible.

People catch viruses 🦠 from others that have “shed” the virus. So why would it be impossible for the vaccinated to shed the toxic spike protein they were injected with, and their cells are replicating?
Its shure that in Future the Antichrist has the ability to controle the people. They cant buy and cant sell if the dont have his sign. And this sign is visible, while the vaccine is not visible. And the people have a choice to worship the beast ore not. With terrible consequences. ( Rev 13)
But if this is through vaccine is speculation.
Also is there non proof from the claim that vaccined people got an toxic spike protein which replicating the cells or change the genetic or kills 65% of the vaccined people.
 

DeanM

Well-known member
May 4, 2021
550
313
63
#22
I predict lower conception and birth rates in the very near future. Gates has been pushing population control for years. Gates is also a major player pushing this untested drug that contains who knows what.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
4,180
893
113
#23

Genipher

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2019
1,070
872
113
#24
Really? I just heard today that the birth rate in America dropped last year. Declined for the 6th year in a row.

https://www.npr.org/2021/05/05/993817146/u-s-birth-rate-fell-by-4-in-2020-hitting-another-record-low

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/05/us/us-birthrate-falls-covid.html

Even if the vaccine doesn't affect fertility, it seems more and more people aren't willing to have kids anymore. Covid is probably a big reason why.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
9,500
562
113
#26
I predict lower conception and birth rates in the very near future. Gates has been pushing population control for years. Gates is also a major player pushing this untested drug that contains who knows what.
Your logical fallacy is called straw man.
Bill Gates pointed out that there's a correlation between people choosing to have fewer children and better quality of life
He never tried to stop anyone from having children
 

Genipher

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2019
1,070
872
113
#27
Your logical fallacy is called straw man.
Bill Gates pointed out that there's a correlation between people choosing to have fewer children and better quality of life
He never tried to stop anyone from having children
"Most interesting, and possibly most influential, has been the recent attraction of private dollars to this cause. (7) In 1997, media millionaire Ted Turner began the trend of donating large sums of private money to population control when he donated one billion dollars to the U.N. Population Fund. (8) Similarly, in February 1999, population control captured the attention and much sought after funds of the world's wealthiest individual, Bill Gates, who donated the largest private donation recorded in history, 2.2 billion dollars, to his private foundation which supports population control. (9)"

https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1159&context=elj
 

DeanM

Well-known member
May 4, 2021
550
313
63
#28
Your logical fallacy is called straw man.
Bill Gates pointed out that there's a correlation between people choosing to have fewer children and better quality of life
He never tried to stop anyone from having children
Google ABC Cuomo coverup then go back to watching your "news". Isee you learned a new term. Strawman.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
5,357
798
113
#29
This is so true. I saw on the internet where Biden said if you were vaccinated you didn't need to wear a mask!

I also remember the internet where Fauci said scientists had studied HCQ and determined it was not effective at treating Covid19 and could even be dangerous!

Or how about the lie that Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation!

But just because some things were lies doesn't mean everything is. We know Biden got 80 million votes and destroyed Obama's record of 69 million. We know that when Kamala Harris promised to eliminate the human rights abuses at the border if we elected her that that is something you can take to the bank! We know that when Biden said that if he was elected he would trust the science, that is as good as gold.
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
36,232
13,517
113
66
Tennessee
#30
The government of China has recently lifted the restrictions on the number of children that a couple may have. For decades there was a one child policy. This was amended to two when the government realised that the population was aging. Geriatrics like me are not so useful in the military or in hard physical work. A lot of older people suffer mental decline as well as physical. Yes, authoritarian regimes are ruthless and murderous. But that can backfire too. Some of Germany's finest minds were murdered because they were Jews. An army of soldiers was required to maintain order in the death camps, even as the war was coming to an end. Only God knows what would have happened if Hitler had not been obsessed with genocide. The Germans were technically superior to the rest of the world. It was too little, too late. if Hitler had bought more time, the end may have been much different.
Hitler killing off all of his generals didn't help his cause either. In regards to China it would take years before a generation of males become old enough to serve effectively in the Chinese military. Of course, with nukes, you really don't need any army for defense but rather more for offense.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
5,357
798
113
#31
I read some post here about how an asteroid will hit Earth in 2019 and destroy the whole planet.

Then I did some Searches and realized that

1) most asteroids would not utterly destroy Earth
2) that Wormwood asteroid would likely just skim Earth (causing damage but not absolute destruction)


Then there are people talking about how a vaccinated person can cause another unvaccinated person to be vaccinated, just by being in close proximity to the vaccinated. Please...

Then there is the thing about putting computer chips in people's arms along w/ the "vaccine" (which I do tend to believe is not really a vaccine... God knows what it is).

and the computer chip is to track people down and kill them..

kill them for what reason? I hven't heard any reason given. True, we cannot trust the govt.. Few would argue w/ that... but I just can't buy this tracking people down and killing them stuff...

So.. I found out the stuff about the asteroid was not accurate and other info..

people should verify the information they get before posting it as unalloyed truth
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
3,594
621
113
#32
If those who want to reduce population just killed themselves, their goal would be successful.

think about it.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
5,357
798
113
#33
If those who want to reduce population just killed themselves, their goal would be successful.

think about it.
No, that is not their goal. The elites represent about 1% of world population, or about 75 million people. You can't expect them to cook their own food or take care of their garden, so they will need another 425 million to serve them. Obviously robots are coming a long way but you still need people to do some jobs like fix the robots. But everyone else is extra, they make the earth crowded, and dirty, and sometimes they don't even bow before the elites. Those are the ones they want to die.
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
1,337
921
113
#34
I read some post here about how an asteroid will hit Earth in 2019 and destroy the whole planet.

Then I did some Searches and realized that

1) most asteroids would not utterly destroy Earth
2) that Wormwood asteroid would likely just skim Earth (causing damage but not absolute destruction)


Then there are people talking about how a vaccinated person can cause another unvaccinated person to be vaccinated, just by being in close proximity to the vaccinated. Please...

Then there is the thing about putting computer chips in people's arms along w/ the "vaccine" (which I do tend to believe is not really a vaccine... God knows what it is).

and the computer chip is to track people down and kill them..

kill them for what reason? I hven't heard any reason given. True, we cannot trust the govt.. Few would argue w/ that... but I just can't buy this tracking people down and killing them stuff...

So.. I found out the stuff about the asteroid was not accurate and other info..

people should verify the information they get before posting it as unalloyed truth
Well said. And how you get a chip down a needle as fine as a hypodermic is... well, it's physically impossible.
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
1,337
921
113
#35
No, that is not their goal. The elites represent about 1% of world population, or about 75 million people. You can't expect them to cook their own food or take care of their garden, so they will need another 425 million to serve them. Obviously robots are coming a long way but you still need people to do some jobs like fix the robots. But everyone else is extra, they make the earth crowded, and dirty, and sometimes they don't even bow before the elites. Those are the ones they want to die.
You don't get it, do you? Robots do not spend money. People are needed to make the economy work. Satan is not interested in killing everyone. He wants people to be his slaves and indeed they are in the world. He is also death, destruction and disease by nature. So he needs people to reproduce to keep his slave population viable. The elites know this. China has relaxed its "once child per family" policy. Some countries encourage migration in spite of the problems it causes. That includes Australia.
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
1,337
921
113
#36
How were Germans technically superior? If anything I would say, Biblically, that the Jewish people are a superior culture of people because they were Yahweh's chosen people.
There are and were remarkably clever Jews in Europe and in most of the world. Hitler's greatest mistake in some ways was to attack the Jews. He drove out people like Einstein. If he had employed those who remained instead of murdering them, he may well have produced the weaponry to save Germany from defeat. Germany produced advance weaponry without the aid of German Jews. No one had a missile program like Germany's. The USA, Russia and the UK took many scientists from Germany to work on their own programs. Werner Von Braun is the best known in the Western world. Some would accuse him of war crimes, but he was to valuable to the US to try him.

If the V2 rockets had come a year earlier, likewise Germany's range of jet fighters and bombers, Germany may have avoided defeat. The one thing that he did not have (thank God) was a viable nuclear weapon program. I suspect that a nuke on Berlin would have brought Germany down eventually. But how much more suffering would that have entailed?
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
5,357
798
113
#37
You don't get it, do you? Robots do not spend money. People are needed to make the economy work. Satan is not interested in killing everyone. He wants people to be his slaves and indeed they are in the world. He is also death, destruction and disease by nature. So he needs people to reproduce to keep his slave population viable. The elites know this. China has relaxed its "once child per family" policy. Some countries encourage migration in spite of the problems it causes. That includes Australia.
The stated goal of 500 million population is not the whim of someone wanting to waste money on this Georgia guidestones, it is a stated goal of Free Masons.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
5,357
798
113
#38
There are and were remarkably clever Jews in Europe and in most of the world. Hitler's greatest mistake in some ways was to attack the Jews. He drove out people like Einstein. If he had employed those who remained instead of murdering them, he may well have produced the weaponry to save Germany from defeat. Germany produced advance weaponry without the aid of German Jews. No one had a missile program like Germany's. The USA, Russia and the UK took many scientists from Germany to work on their own programs. Werner Von Braun is the best known in the Western world. Some would accuse him of war crimes, but he was to valuable to the US to try him.

If the V2 rockets had come a year earlier, likewise Germany's range of jet fighters and bombers, Germany may have avoided defeat. The one thing that he did not have (thank God) was a viable nuclear weapon program. I suspect that a nuke on Berlin would have brought Germany down eventually. But how much more suffering would that have entailed?
Jews, Christians and Muslims are contrary to the Free Masons and Globalists. You cannot have a totalitarian regime with people of faith because the people of faith will always recognize God as the ultimate authority. If Germany and Hitler are viewed as having behaved "logically" then the only logical explanation is that exterminating the Jews was a key goal of his administration. Where did the "German Miracle" come from? It came from money being poured into Germany from Rothschild and Ford and others (for example Bush). Why? 1. War is profitable, they all made a killing on the war. 2. Why would they lose money on their investments in Germany? They didn't that is why killing the Jews was called "the final solution", they stole their houses, gold teeth, and all their assets to pay back the loans. 3. Why would Rothschild who is located in London finance Hitler to attack and destroy Britain? The better question would be why would Germany not destroy Britain and instead turn to attack Russia? It is idiotic unless Rothschild was the puppet master and the real fear was of communism which killed the Czar.

If the biggest fear is communism then building up a very strong Germany as a bulwark against Russian communism makes perfect sense.