-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
D
Homosexuality in itself isn't sinful, homosexual ACTS are, according to a certain interpretation of scripture, that is. In that respect people don't sin as long as they don't act on their gay urges. Heterosexuality in ITSELF isn't sinful too, but 'heterosexual ACTS' can be, if people 'indulge in them' out of wedlock.
But I guess I understand what you mean when you say: 'homosexuality is no more inherently sinful than heterosexuality.' A married man who has the wandering eye for another woman is as INHERENTLY sinful as a guy who checks out another guy. They are both attracted to 'forbidden fruit' (no pun intended
). Sin is sin. (Mark 9:47)
But I guess I understand what you mean when you say: 'homosexuality is no more inherently sinful than heterosexuality.' A married man who has the wandering eye for another woman is as INHERENTLY sinful as a guy who checks out another guy. They are both attracted to 'forbidden fruit' (no pun intended
). Sin is sin. (Mark 9:47)
How do we know that God dosn't punish sinners through unleashing HIV etc? If we all stuck to what God requires of us then Sexually Transmitted Disease etc would be non existant.
DO you not think it strange that every time the human race eradicate or find a successful treatment for an STD an even more deadlier form comes along.
DO you not think it strange that every time the human race eradicate or find a successful treatment for an STD an even more deadlier form comes along.
It seems with this study, and others, that homosexuality is inherently more dangerous than heterosexuality.
Higher rates of std's, aids and hepatitis.
Fornication and adultery are bad sins, the bible calls all sexual sins the only sin against the body, but homosexuality seems to be a conductor of disease more than heterosexuality.
Higher rates of std's, aids and hepatitis.
Fornication and adultery are bad sins, the bible calls all sexual sins the only sin against the body, but homosexuality seems to be a conductor of disease more than heterosexuality.
A
I'd say so. Studies show that a female transsexual (man to transsexual) has an incidence of AIDs that is FIFTY times higher than a male heterosexual.
But that has to be understood in the context that about 70% of the world’s HIV/AIDS population is found in Africa. 28 million Africans are affected and HIV/AIDS has become the number one killer on that continent with more than 10 percent of people aged 15 to 49 infected in 16 African countries.
(Try to imagine being a parent with teenagers in Africa. If they slip up once, it could be their life and also when an immediate family member contracts AIDs, it can affect the normalcy of family life for the rest of the members, of course).
Sexual promiscuity outside the bounds of God's design for humanity (e.g. celibacy followed by monogamous heterosexual marriage) is driving the disease though intravenous drug use plays a role too.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that about 9% of IV drug users have AIDs (down from 18% of them in the 1990s) from needle sharing. Of course, a percentage of that demographic is gay too so the actual percentage of heterosexual IV drug users contracting AIDs from needle sharing would be lower.
MSM= homosexual. IDU= Intravenous drug user.
It's a shitty disease for sure. Untreated, you have 9-11 years to live on average. There's no doubt from the statistics that in the U.S., at least, homosexual acts are driving it's spread with black homosexuals the number one affected group per capita (blacks make up only 12% of the U.S. population).
In America, being a black male homosexual who likes to inject drugs is like placing five cartridges in a six shooter and playing Russian roulette. Lest we forget, HIV was originally called GRID (gay-related immune deficiency).
Here's the rub, and there's no way around it, the CDC reports that homosexuality and bisexuality cause 85% of HIV infections in America: CDC - Statistics Overview - Statistics Center - HIV/AIDS
So naturally liberals are committed to ensuring that America's children are heavily indoctrinated from pre-school through the twelfth grade with the homosexual agenda. Why have less of the problem when you can grow it substantially? So what if they're children that need to be shepherded into living moral lives. Liberals don't care about that stuff. America should be much more immoral and populated with many more HIV carriers in their view. *rolls eyes*.
Also, the liberals tell us that homosexuals should be able to donate blood and that anyone who disagrees with them is a "racist." *rolls eyes.* I know, I know, it's completely illogical.
A thirty something married man from our church died of AIDs recently after being infected in a blood transfusion at a local hospital from blood that was screened for the HIV virus twice. It took him two weeks to go from the time he went into the emergency room and it was a horrible death by all accounts from everyone that witnessed it. I haven't learned if his wife is infected and on her way out yet. Imagine how many more of these there will be if the single greatest demographic carrying the HIV virus are allowed to donate blood. Those who advocate for this will be indirectly responsible for the murder of a great many innocent men, women, and children if they find a way to override us on the issue.
But that has to be understood in the context that about 70% of the world’s HIV/AIDS population is found in Africa. 28 million Africans are affected and HIV/AIDS has become the number one killer on that continent with more than 10 percent of people aged 15 to 49 infected in 16 African countries.
(Try to imagine being a parent with teenagers in Africa. If they slip up once, it could be their life and also when an immediate family member contracts AIDs, it can affect the normalcy of family life for the rest of the members, of course).
Sexual promiscuity outside the bounds of God's design for humanity (e.g. celibacy followed by monogamous heterosexual marriage) is driving the disease though intravenous drug use plays a role too.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that about 9% of IV drug users have AIDs (down from 18% of them in the 1990s) from needle sharing. Of course, a percentage of that demographic is gay too so the actual percentage of heterosexual IV drug users contracting AIDs from needle sharing would be lower.
MSM= homosexual. IDU= Intravenous drug user.
It's a shitty disease for sure. Untreated, you have 9-11 years to live on average. There's no doubt from the statistics that in the U.S., at least, homosexual acts are driving it's spread with black homosexuals the number one affected group per capita (blacks make up only 12% of the U.S. population).
In America, being a black male homosexual who likes to inject drugs is like placing five cartridges in a six shooter and playing Russian roulette. Lest we forget, HIV was originally called GRID (gay-related immune deficiency).
Here's the rub, and there's no way around it, the CDC reports that homosexuality and bisexuality cause 85% of HIV infections in America: CDC - Statistics Overview - Statistics Center - HIV/AIDS
So naturally liberals are committed to ensuring that America's children are heavily indoctrinated from pre-school through the twelfth grade with the homosexual agenda. Why have less of the problem when you can grow it substantially? So what if they're children that need to be shepherded into living moral lives. Liberals don't care about that stuff. America should be much more immoral and populated with many more HIV carriers in their view. *rolls eyes*.
Also, the liberals tell us that homosexuals should be able to donate blood and that anyone who disagrees with them is a "racist." *rolls eyes.* I know, I know, it's completely illogical.
A thirty something married man from our church died of AIDs recently after being infected in a blood transfusion at a local hospital from blood that was screened for the HIV virus twice. It took him two weeks to go from the time he went into the emergency room and it was a horrible death by all accounts from everyone that witnessed it. I haven't learned if his wife is infected and on her way out yet. Imagine how many more of these there will be if the single greatest demographic carrying the HIV virus are allowed to donate blood. Those who advocate for this will be indirectly responsible for the murder of a great many innocent men, women, and children if they find a way to override us on the issue.