King Charles is crowned king

[ZNP]

Heraldic Achievement

According to international law, a person's heraldic achievement is considered to be unique to them and their immediate family. However, it is important to note that there is no single international law governing heraldry. Instead, heraldry is governed by national laws and customs in each country.

While there is no international law governing heraldry, it is generally considered inappropriate to use someone else's heraldic achievement without their permission or to falsely claim a coat of arms that does not belong to you. This is seen as a form of misrepresentation and can be subject to legal action in some countries.

Heraldic achievements have a long history and are still used today by many countries, organizations, and families as a way of representing their identity and values.

The description given of the Antichrist in Revelation is to be understood literally and yet there are no creatures with four heads, etc. We know it is a person, a king, a ruler, and yet the description is very fanciful. However, if we understand that Heraldic Achievement is unique to each royal person you will understand the description given in Daniel and in Revelation is very precise, it can only refer to one person because these symbols are unique to each person, and so we can see that this applies precisely to King Charles and cannot apply to anyone else.

 

[ZNP]

What about "He shall confirm the covenant with the many"?

I think most teaching about the Antichrist says this is where we will know who the Antichrist is.

This word "confirm" can also be translated as "strengthen" or "impose".

Many of us assumed or guessed that the covenant would be to allow the Jews to rebuild the temple, but it does not say that.

So then, if King Charles is the Antichrist, has He confirmed the Covenant with the many or has he Imposed the covenant with the many?

I would suggest that in June of 2020 Prince Charles stood up at the World Economic Forum and declared the great reset. That is the covenant that is going to be imposed on the world, or confirmed with the many depending on how receptive you are.

 

[Magenta]

The description given of the Antichrist in Revelation is to be understood literally and yet there are no creatures with four heads, etc.

Ezekiel 1
1In the thirtieth year, on the fifth day of the fourth month, while I was among
the exiles by the River Kebar, the heavens opened and I saw visions of God.

2On the fifth day of the month—it was the fifth year of the exile of King Jehoiachin—

3the word of the LORD came directly to Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, in the land
of the Chaldeansb by the River Kebar. And there the LORD’s hand was upon him.

4I looked and saw a whirlwind coming from the north, a great cloud with fire flashing back and forth and brilliant
light all around it. In the center of the fire was a gleam like amber,c 5and within it was the form of four living creatures.

And this was their appearance: They had a human form, 6but each had four faces and four wings. 7Their
legs were straight, and the soles of their feet were like the hooves of a calf, gleaming like polished bronze.

8Under their wings on their four sides they had human hands. All four living creatures had faces and wings,
9and their wings were touching one another. They did not turn as they moved; each one went straight ahead.

10The form of their faces was that of a man, and each of the four had the face of a lion on the right
side, the face of an ox on the left side, and also the face of an eagle. 11Such were their faces.

 

[ZNP]

Ezekiel 1
1In the thirtieth year, on the fifth day of the fourth month, while I was among
the exiles by the River Kebar, the heavens opened and I saw visions of God.

2On the fifth day of the month—it was the fifth year of the exile of King Jehoiachin—

3the word of the LORD came directly to Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, in the land
of the Chaldeansb by the River Kebar. And there the LORD’s hand was upon him.

4I looked and saw a whirlwind coming from the north, a great cloud with fire flashing back and forth and brilliant
light all around it. In the center of the fire was a gleam like amber,c 5and within it was the form of four living creatures.

And this was their appearance: They had a human form, 6but each had four faces and four wings. 7Their
legs were straight, and the soles of their feet were like the hooves of a calf, gleaming like polished bronze.

8Under their wings on their four sides they had human hands. All four living creatures had faces and wings,
9and their wings were touching one another. They did not turn as they moved; each one went straight ahead.

10The form of their faces was that of a man, and each of the four had the face of a lion on the right
side, the face of an ox on the left side, and also the face of an eagle. 11Such were their faces.

Revelation 13:2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

This is an accurate and precise description of Prince Charles Heraldic Achievement.

This dragon is described in Revelation 12:3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon,

This is an accurate and precise description of the dragon on Prince Charle's heraldic achievement.

Daniel 7:8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.

In heraldry the little horn would be understood to refer to a unicorn. This is an accurate and precise description of Prince Charles heraldic achievement, his unicorn (unlike his mother's) has eyes of a man.

https://www.google.com/search?q=pri...pr=3&safe=active&ssui=on#imgrc=jy7-CqeOhaNSCM

 

[OLDMANBORNAGAIN]

I just hope that good old King Charlie is sincere, when he says that he's a Christian!

 

[Nehemiah6]

Many of us assumed or guessed that the covenant would be to allow the Jews to rebuild the temple, but it does not say that.

The covenant is presumably a phony peace treaty which also allows temple sacrifices.

 

[ZNP]

The covenant is presumably a phony peace treaty which also allows temple sacrifices.

Presumably, but there is no Bible verse that says this.

 

[ZNP]

This guy claims (11 minutes and ten seconds in) that during the coronation ceremony of King Charles there was a private ceremony where he went into a private room, put on linen cloth and was anointed oil to be the king of Israel.

 

[ZNP]

 

[Nehemiah6]

Presumably, but there is no Bible verse that says this.

And that is why you are supposed to connect the dots.

 

[ZNP]

And that is why you are supposed to connect the dots.

We should be very clear which of our doctrines are based on the black and white word in the NT, and which are inferred, because doctrines that are inferred could be easily mistaken.

 

[Nehemiah6]

We should be very clear which of our doctrines are based on the black and white word in the NT, and which are inferred, because doctrines that are inferred could be easily mistaken.

The Bible must not only be studied but also interpreted correctly. Thus the admonition to rightly divide the Word of Truth. Actually there are many things in Scripture which are not textbook answers. God expects every Christian to connect the dots. That is why Christ said "whoso readeth let him, understand".

 

[ZNP]

The Bible must not only be studied but also interpreted correctly. Thus the admonition to rightly divide the Word of Truth. Actually there are many things in Scripture which are not textbook answers. God expects every Christian to connect the dots. That is why Christ said "whoso readeth let him, understand".

Sounds like you are confusing man's traditions with the truth of God.

 

[ZNP]

In a world where faith and law collide, a battle of epic proportions is about to take place. Meet the man who claims to be the chosen one, the one who mimics the Antichrist of the Bible. Born six months after Israel, just as Jesus was born six months after John the Baptist, he has spent his entire life hearing that he is the savior of the world.

But now, he has gone too far. He has created a coat of arms with the mouth of a lion, the body of a leopard, and the feet of a bear. He claims to receive his power from the red dragon and calls himself the little horn. The final straw? He wants to place a winged statue of himself in the Holy place of the temple, proclaiming himself to be the savior of the world, not Jesus. He changes laws, instituting ten commandments for the climate change movement. He also is confirming the covenant known as the Great Reset or Agenda 2030.

Enter two men of God who believe that this man has crossed the line. They sue him for plagiarism and fraud, taking him to court and bringing this battle into the legal arena. But the case is not as simple as it seems, is he a fraud or does he have a legitimate claim to be the Black Prince? The chosen one has his own team of lawyers, and they are determined to fight tooth and nail for their client's cause, and it turns out that all the best lawyers work for Satan.

As the trial begins, tensions rise, and the fate of the world hangs in the balance. Will the chosen one be held accountable for his actions, or will he be allowed to continue on his path of destruction? This legal thriller will keep you on the edge of your seat until the very end, which could be a guillotine or a nuclear holocaust.

 

[ZNP]

The Coronation of King Charles III and the Coming of Mashiach {Torah Illuminated Series}

 

[ZNP]

The Coronation of King Charles the Third With the Oil of Har Hazeisim - The Historic Message

 

[Susanna]

Fair enough but then you also must answer the question, on what are you basing your claim that he is not the Antichrist.

If you agree to that then I will summarize the evidence based on the Bible.

You haven’t shown any evidence based on the Bible. It’s your flawed interpretation of the Bible you have displayed.

Just to be clear on this. Using the Bible to prove or disprove who’s The Antichrist is not possible. It will always be a biased opinion interpreting the text.

 

[ZNP]

You haven’t shown any evidence based on the Bible. It’s your flawed interpretation of the Bible you have displayed.

Just to be clear on this. Using the Bible to prove or disprove who’s The Antichrist is not possible. It will always be a biased opinion interpreting the text.

So then as you have not provided any basis on which you have disproved or would prove that King Charles is the Antichrist, neither will I. All you have done is provide a basis for a movable goal post.

One wonders why the writers of the bible even wrote about the Antichrist if according to you it is not possible use those words to help you discern him.

 

[ZNP]

Just to be clear on this. Using the Bible to prove or disprove who’s The Antichrist is not possible. It will always be a biased opinion interpreting the text.

In Post 171 you said "King Charles is not the Antichrist."

Yet here you say that it is not possible to use the Bible to determine this.

So that does clear up a whole lot about you, and your position on this issue.

My position is it that it is extremely arrogant to claim who the Antichrist is or is not without basing that conclusion solely on the Bible.

My position is that we are in the end times, we are seeing many prophecies fulfilled ever since 1948 when Israel was reformed as a nation and King Charles was born.

My position is that the safest place to stand is on the sure word of God, yes there have been eroneous interpretations but just as our understanding of the properties of flight have improved and with it our airplanes so also our understanding of the word of God improves and with it the light that it shines on our path.

Matthew 23:13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

 

[ZNP]

Just to be clear on this. Using the Bible to prove or disprove who’s The Antichrist is not possible. It will always be a biased opinion interpreting the text.

Be warned, if you accept this doctrine from this person what else can you not use the Bible to prove or disprove?

How about false prophets? Would that be a result of biased opinion?

How about the Apostasy? Would that be a result of biased opinion?

How about Luke 21:28 And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.

How would you know when to look up?

You will have to begin removing portions of the Bible. What is the point of Matthew 24 or Luke 21 if your biased opinions will just make it impossible to know? Get rid of the entire book of Revelation. because if Susanna can't read it then neither can you.

Consider how presumptuous and arrogant this doctrine is. Who is Susanna to decide what Bible verses can be read and what can't, which ones can be used to teach and which can't.

These ones speak evil of things they don't understand.