Liberal hypocrisy: Clinton fails to shatter 'glass ceiling,' hires all-male staff

[Viligant_Warrior]

Ya know how Hillary Clinton is always going around promoting "equal rights/equal pay" for women? How she's always encouraging other women to "help one another out" and promote the hiring of women into key corporate positions? Well, turns out she don't practice what she preaches. But what else is new?

Hillary Clinton dinged for ‘All Madam President’s Men,’ her near all-male staff

Former Secretary of State and presumptive Democratic Party presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has an image problem with women — and it’s due to what one writer dubs her “All Madam President’s Men” staff reality: Nearly all men; few women.

The Montana Standard ran a column from Dana Milbank, Washington Post Writers Group, that began: As Mrs. Clinton “begins to staff her nascent presidential campaign, a paradox has emerged.” In 2008, her campaign was run by a woman and included several women staffers in the top-tier. But now, Mrs. Clinton’s turned to “the old-boy network,” and adopted many staffers from President Obama’s mostly male campaign, he wrote.

FNC added another perspective on this today on F&F. They reported women on both her Senate and State staffs said they averaged 72 cents in salary for every dollar her male staff members earned.

Can you spell "W-A-R O-N W-O-M-E-N", Hill?

 

[kennethcadwell]

Wow really Viligant_ Warrior you keep posting exhaustive threads to keep bagging on a person from the democratic party.
Why don't you spend some time with threads speaking of the how stupid the republican party is being as well.

Like the recent sitting on their butts and not getting funding passed for Homeland Security.
There is a deadline this Friday and if a bill doesn't get passed tons of employees will be without a paycheck. There is a bill on the table and they refuse to pass it.....

 

[Viligant_Warrior]

Wow really Viligant_ Warrior you keep posting exhaustive threads to keep bagging on a person from the democratic party.
Why don't you spend some time with threads speaking of the how stupid the republican party is being as well.

Like the recent sitting on their butts and not getting funding passed for Homeland Security.
There is a deadline this Friday and if a bill doesn't get passed tons of employees will be without a paycheck. There is a bill on the table and they refuse to pass it.....

When a thread like this is posted, you never, ever comment on its content, but attempt to derail it.

Either comment on the subject matter of the OP, or butt out. Thank you.

 

[David_1]

As a left wing person, I don't like Hillary, and I agree she shouldn't be hypocritical.

If she ever became president, I don't think much progress will happen for the USA. But still... less death and torture than a Republican president.

Do we really need another Clinton or Bush?

How's the non-Christian Mormon guy you all love? Is he running?

 

[kennethcadwell]

View attachment 98632

When a thread like this is posted, you never, ever comment on its content, but attempt to derail it.

Either comment on the subject matter of the OP, or butt out. Thank you.

That is because you have a history of only putting people down from the democratic party, which is not the proper thinking of a Christian.
We are to show love, compassion, and pray for these people not constantly put people down just because you don't like them or their affiliation.
This is why I do this to correct a fellow brother and try to get them away from bias thinking which is of the flesh. I understand you don't like Obama, Clinton, and others in the democratic party and so on. But spend more time in love and prayer for these individuals then constantly bagging on them. For once again this is not the proper attitude of a Christian.

You do know the republican party is making, and has done just as many bone head decisions and stuck their foots in their mouths so many times in recent to past many years. Yet I never see you post one thread on them, so this is why I do what I do. You can call it off topic, or thread derail all you want, but I call it standing up for the morals of how Christians are to act. For we are to squash these unedifying topics that their purpose is of bashing on others, not sit back and act like they are acceptable.

 

[Mitspa]

Where can I get that off-topic thing?

 

[didymos]

Ya know how Hillary Clinton is always going around promoting "equal rights/equal pay" for women? How she's always encouraging other women to "help one another out"...

Hillary is a woman?

 

[kaylagrl]

As a left wing person, I don't like Hillary, and I agree she shouldn't be hypocritical.

If she ever became president, I don't think much progress will happen for the USA. But still... less death and torture than a Republican president.

Do we really need another Clinton or Bush?

How's the non-Christian Mormon guy you all love? Is he running?

Didn't love the Mormon guy,just the lesser of two evils.IMO

 

[Viligant_Warrior]

Where can I get that off-topic thing?

Check your PMs, Mit.

 

[Viligant_Warrior]

Hillary is a woman?

Hm ... debatable. Good point.

 

[kennethcadwell]

Didn't love the Mormon guy,just the lesser of two evils.IMO

Unfortunately this next presidential election will most likely end up the same way, voting for the lesser of two evils.
Or refusing to vote since two evils would be the only choice.

Romney said he isn't running, but I wouldn't vote for him any way.
Clinton and Bush seem to be the front runners right now, and the republicans history the past couple elections has been to pick the worst running candidate out of the bunch to run for president. McCain if he would have won would most likely had us in WW3 already back then. Then if Romney would have won this last go around the only people that would be striving would be those who make more then $100,000 a year. As he clearly said he would lower taxes on the rich, but raise them on the middle class. Then he was going to do away with a couple programs that 1,000's of Americans depend on just because the abuse of them from a few individuals. And made his famous statement about not caring for the 47% of Americans who rely on those programs.......

Government of the people, by the people, for the people !!!

This standard has gotten lost by both parties, and both parties are guilty of saying and doing outlandish things.....

 

[3Scoreand10]

Wow really Viligant_ Warrior you keep posting exhaustive threads to keep bagging on a person from the democratic party.
Why don't you spend some time with threads speaking of the how stupid the republican party is being as well.

Like the recent sitting on their butts and not getting funding passed for Homeland Security.
There is a deadline this Friday and if a bill doesn't get passed tons of employees will be without a paycheck. There is a bill on the table and they refuse to pass it.....

Wait a minute!!
The hiuse passed a bill and there are enought votes in the senate to pass it, BUT the Dems are filibustering it BECAUSE it is not what KING Obama wants.
So to say it is the Rep fault is a LIE.
And the employees will be paid just as they always have been in the past.

Sorry Viligant Warrior, I know it is off the subject, but I could not this LIE go without telling the truth.

 

[Viligant_Warrior]

Wait a minute!!
The hiuse passed a bill and there are enought votes in the senate to pass it, BUT the Dems are filibustering it BECAUSE it is not what KING Obama wants.
So to say it is the Rep fault is a LIE.
And the employees will be paid just as they always have been in the past.

Sorry Viligant Warrior, I know it is off the subject, but I could not this LIE go without telling the truth.

No sweat, 3. I was going to post the same kind of response, but 1) he won't see truth when it is posted, and 2) he'd still try to derail the thread. However, it is good the truth is up for others to see, given his willful ignorance will attempt to hide, twist, or deny it.

 

[kaylagrl]

Unfortunately this next presidential election will most likely end up the same way, voting for the lesser of two evils.
Or refusing to vote since two evils would be the only choice.

Romney said he isn't running, but I wouldn't vote for him any way.
Clinton and Bush seem to be the front runners right now, and the republicans history the past couple elections has been to pick the worst running candidate out of the bunch to run for president. McCain if he would have won would most likely had us in WW3 already back then. Then if Romney would have won this last go around the only people that would be striving would be those who make more then $100,000 a year. As he clearly said he would lower taxes on the rich, but raise them on the middle class. Then he was going to do away with a couple programs that 1,000's of Americans depend on just because the abuse of them from a few individuals. And made his famous statement about not caring for the 47% of Americans who rely on those programs.......

Government of the people, by the people, for the people !!!

This standard has gotten lost by both parties, and both parties are guilty of saying and doing outlandish things.....

Government of the people, by the people, for the people !! I really wish people would get this in the US.I hear so many people saying "well I just dont vote because theres nothing I can do about the state of the country". About 20yrs or so ago in Canada there was a party in power that was just ruining the country.Know what happened? Canucks got together and wiped out the whole party save for one chair. Guess who learned a lesson? I was so disappointed when I moved to the US where I figured people wouldn't take foolishness off their gov't,to see the mess the country is in. The middle of the country needs to get together and vote in people who put country first and themselves last.High past time the moral majority spoke up and stood up. The young people of the next generation are watching.

 

[kennethcadwell]

Wait a minute!!
The hiuse passed a bill and there are enought votes in the senate to pass it, BUT the Dems are filibustering it BECAUSE it is not what KING Obama wants.
So to say it is the Rep fault is a LIE.
And the employees will be paid just as they always have been in the past.

Sorry Viligant Warrior, I know it is off the subject, but I could not this LIE go without telling the truth.

I don't know where you are getting your info from because the democrats want it passed, and the republicans stated this morning the reason they do not want to vote on it is because it has immigration reform and funding in the bill as well.

They said instead of voting this bill in place they want to come up with another bill that does not have the immigration issue in it, but by doing so means that the earliest they could even get one drafted up for a vote would not be tell Friday when the deadline is up and many will be left without a paycheck. So I don't know where you get the democrats are blocking it, because they are not.

 

[3Scoreand10]

I don't know where you are getting your info from because the democrats want it passed, and the republicans stated this morning the reason they do not want to vote on it is because it has immigration reform and funding in the bill as well.

They said instead of voting this bill in place they want to come up with another bill that does not have the immigration issue in it, but by doing so means that the earliest they could even get one drafted up for a vote would not be tell Friday when the deadline is up and many will be left without a paycheck. So I don't know where you get the democrats are blocking it, because they are not.

Where are you getting your info?
Acording to every news report I have watched or read, the Dems have been filibustering the bill all week because it defunds Obama's amnesty exc order.
What news are you watching?

 

[3Scoreand10]

I don't know where you are getting your info from because the democrats want it passed, and the republicans stated this morning the reason they do not want to vote on it is because it has immigration reform and funding in the bill as well.

They said instead of voting this bill in place they want to come up with another bill that does not have the immigration issue in it, but by doing so means that the earliest they could even get one drafted up for a vote would not be tell Friday when the deadline is up and many will be left without a paycheck. So I don't know where you get the democrats are blocking it, because they are not.

According to CNN, Politico, and fox, the Dems have been filibustering the bill.
Late yesterday McConnell offered two seperate bills for vote on Friday and Dems rejected his offer.

 

[Billyd]

Government of the people, by the people, for the people !! I really wish people would get this in the US.I hear so many people saying "well I just dont vote because theres nothing I can do about the state of the country". About 20yrs or so ago in Canada there was a party in power that was just ruining the country.Know what happened? Canucks got together and wiped out the whole party save for one chair. Guess who learned a lesson? I was so disappointed when I moved to the US where I figured people wouldn't take foolishness off their gov't,to see the mess the country is in. The middle of the country needs to get together and vote in people who put country first and themselves last.High past time the moral majority spoke up and stood up. The young people of the next generation are watching.

Unfortunately when the young people in the US vote, they will vote for the person with the best Twitter one liner game. To me, that's even worse than the people of my generation that vote on the cleverest ad program, or those who will vote on the basis of skin color or sex.

 

[3Scoreand10]

Unfortunately when the young people in the US vote, they will vote for the person with the best Twitter one liner game. To me, that's even worse than the people of my generation that vote on the cleverest ad program, or those who will vote on the basis of skin color or sex.

Or those in our younger days that voted by party only.
My grandad never knew who was on the ballot, he just ALWAYS voted Democratic.

 

[Billyd]

Or those in our younger days that voted by party only.
My grandad never knew who was on the ballot, he just ALWAYS voted Democratic.

You are right there. Here we called them "Yeller Dog Democrats". I'm thankful that I had a great Civics (American Government) teacher. He taught to research all candidates before we pulled the lever on the voting machine.