Minnesota Shooting (Lets Start Over)

  • Thread starter WarriorForChrist
  • Start date
  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,003
4,315
113
Re: History Lesson Pt. II for Peacenik

as i go through the thread some of you are making the points to personal I have removed some comments but as I see it is very hard to go through each to remove all the personal comments. the comments :like Brain washed, crazy person, hypocrites, etc...

I must say are not all here professing Christians ? yet i get pm's telling the mod's this person is insulting yet those who send pm's are doing the very same thing .
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,003
4,315
113
Lol his posts are all personal with his attacks on Law Enforcement. But you choose to single my post out. You sir can delete my account.

I would ask you to look little deeper sir. I dressed more than one post in this thread. But if I will do as you have asked .

God Bless
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
I am so sick of hearing about this. Go ahead, all you ex-cops, and current LEO's, and whoever else that disagree's with me that we need major changes with the police, and has been been telling me I am this or that.
Tell me I am rushing to judgement, I need to wait to hear the facts.
The officer that shot this unarmed black man, on the ground, with his hands up in the air, explaining the situation, heard all the facts and still shot this guy.
Pathetic that any of you are okay with this.
Just continue to defend their irresponsible action's, their inhumanity, their insensitivity to others. Some of them are just outright animals. And I am not backing off that statement. That is what they are. Just reprehensible depraved human beings.
Disgusting.

[video=youtube;U6jzV336DTs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6jzV336DTs[/video]

Maybe I can explain a few reasons why some here don't think you are rushing to judgment and not waiting to hear all of the facts.

I saw this video posted on my MSN home page a few minutes ago. You decided to comment on it only moments after viewing it. Did the video include the shooting? Why not? Did the first video you posted include the part where the police ordered the black man to lie on his stomach? No, it did not. They gave him that order twice. Did he comply? No. Why not? Did the police receive a call of an armed man? Yes. When police suspect a person is armed, is it wise to take that persons word that they are not carrying a gun? No, it can be fatal trusting someone who was reported as having a gun and then simply believing they don't have a gun because they said so.

Unlike the Minnesota shooting, the Dallas shooting, the Michael Brown shooting, and the Eric Gardner choking death, and the death of Freddie Gray that resulted in several police officers being charged with manslaughter, where officers were proven to have acted within the law, this shooting will possibly, if not likely be ruled excessive force. Despite the man refusing to comply with lawful commands, officers were behind cover and had a degree of control over the situation. The only reason I can see that they fired on the man was to protect the other person from being shot by him. But since they did not see a weapon, and the man had his hands in plain view, there seemed to be no reason to fire at him, based on what was recorded in the video.

It is worth noting that you often and regularly accuse officers of using excessive force in cases that were investigated and a grand jury determined there was no wrong doing. I have not noticed one instance where you posted an apology here and stated you rushed to judgment. That is likely the reason you have been labeled by some, or most, that you are anti-police. There are over 300,000,000 people living in the U.S. How many people are killed by police each year in cases where police misconduct is proven to have taken place? I recently asked someone to post three such incidents that have happened this year and got no reply. Why do you believe this is a widespread problem? More importantly, why do you continue believing that police officers did wrong when they were either not charged with any crime or they were cleared of committing any crime, like with the Freddie Gray death. It wasn't until after people rioted in Ferguson, that we learned the truth. Michael Brown was not a good kid. Michael Brown had just committed a strong-arm robbery moments before he assaulted officer Wilson and was subsequently shot and killed. Michael Brown never raised his hands and said; don't shoot. That was made up by his fellow robber and friend. Yet after all of this time, we still see protestors wearing t-shirts that read; hands up, don't shoot. The Dallas shooting was justified. The Minnesota shooting was not recorded, but most agree that Castile was not compliant and he reached for his gun. That is the common thread. People who are confronted by police need to listen to the police and do exactly what they are told to do. Try to find even one instance where a fully compliant suspect was shot by police.

So my advice to you is simmer down. What you see on the internet does not indicate widespread failure by police. The very few instances that are proven to be cases of excessive force prove that the police are held to account. The ones where the police are cleared of wrong doing show that the facts prove they acted within the law. Those that are quick to judge are rarely interested in the facts and make their judgment based on a few seconds of video that may or may not even include the actual shooting.
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
Rwanda?

Clinton was president of the USA, not Rwanda.

When he traveled there he walked the streets and was greeted by tens of thousands of people who praised him.



Your hero Bush said "mission accomplished". But has he ever walked the streets of Baghdad and shook hands with strangers the way Clinton did?



As for Bosnia, yes I objected to what Clinton did. However, his mission was part of NATO's action and was not unilateral.

Lastly as we have discussed and documented on this forum before, ISIS was created under Bush, not anyone else. Blame him.
And President Bush was President of the United States, not Iraq. His job was to protect the U.S. and it's allies. He decided not to wait around to be attacked again, but to take the fight to our enemies. It was the right call and was supported by democrats and Americans.

You have got to be telling some sick joke about Clinton being praised in Rwanda. There were over 800,000 people chopped to pieces with machete's. Do you think any of them would have praised President Clinton? The only people left to see Clinton were the murderers. You seem to think the praise of mass murderers who committed genocide, is something to be proud of. I suppose Hitler appreciated the praise of Germans who liked the fact that Jews were exterminated.

The more time passes, the more you'll refine your take on ISIS. In his first term, President Obama referred to ISIS as the JV team and not of consequence. There was a reason. His national security team and intelligence officers reported that ISIS was a small group of 300 insurgents. Then, in the following year, partly because President Obama ignored ISIS, they quickly grew to over 3000. Then one year later they numbered 30,000 and were a threat both to the region and to the United States. This cancer cannot be blamed on George Bush, no mater how you try to do it. The seeds of discontent are always present in the years after your country is attacked by a foreign army. It took 5-7 years before U.S. military presence could leave Japan and Germany, after WWII. They had insurgents as well. President Bush took national security seriously. President Obama was usually golfing when major decisions needed to be made. Obama allowed Syria to devolve and that created armies of jihadi fighters. He created this mess. He ignored the mess. He still has no plan to defeat ISIS and stop Assad. He has all but given Iran nuclear weapons and given Russia the freedom to invade it's neighbors.

It is likely that you would have called FDR a traitor. He declared war on Germany, who never attacked the U.S., and he sat down and shook hands with and made deals with Stalin at Yalta, the worst mass murderer in the history of the world, until Mao's great leap forward that killed 40 million or more Chinese. I also suppose you view JFK as a traitor, after he tried to overthrow Cuba and nearly sparked a nuclear exchange with the USSR. Not to mention sending troops into Vietnam. If you can excuse Clinton for ignoring genocide because he was praised by those who committed genocide, I'm sure you can excuse democrat Presidents who took part in the deaths of 54 million people during WWII. Maybe you'll find a way to blame George Bush for WWII.
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
Re: History Lesson Pt. II for Peacenik

as i go through the thread some of you are making the points to personal I have removed some comments but as I see it is very hard to go through each to remove all the personal comments. the comments :like Brain washed, crazy person, hypocrites, etc...

I must say are not all here professing Christians ? yet i get pm's telling the mod's this person is insulting yet those who send pm's are doing the very same thing .
I appreciate the difficulty of your job as moderator. I think you are correct in your assessment that topic often become emotional. I do my best to dig through the facts. I've always enjoyed Josh McDowell and his book; Evidence That Demands A Verdict. He systematically proves that Jesus Christ existed and was crucified and then rose from the dead, based on evidence and eye-witness statements. It has likely led many people to Christ and to salvation. There are so many people with so many experiences in their lives that cloud their judgment. Some have had negative experiences with police officers or even Christians and had difficulty overcoming their feelings of anger toward them. I try to defend law enforcement officers in general, until facts show they have acted inappropriately. There are many slanderous remarks made about police, in general, and they are seldom supported by facts. I am glad to see that most believers support our police, our military men and women, our country and our freedom and liberty. I can't imagine living anywhere else and being able to worship God as we do. When I see your American flag avatar, it makes me feel proud.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
26
38
Re: History Lesson Pt. II for Peacenik

as i go through the thread some of you are making the points to personal I have removed some comments but as I see it is very hard to go through each to remove all the personal comments. the comments :like Brain washed, crazy person, hypocrites, etc...

I must say are not all here professing Christians ? yet i get pm's telling the mod's this person is insulting yet those who send pm's are doing the very same thing .







​Bingo! Quote of the Year!
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
26
38
Sinnerman; said:
And President Bush was President of the United States, not Iraq. His job was to protect the U.S. and it's allies. He decided not to wait around to be attacked again, but to take the fight to our enemies. It was the right call and was supported by democrats and Americans.

You have got to be telling some sick joke about Clinton being praised in Rwanda.
SNIP






LOL. Too discombobulated to warrant a reply as Clinton was shown all over tv being praised by Rwandans where he remains a national hero unlike traitor Bush in Iraq.
 
V

Voldemort

Guest
And President Bush was President of the United States, not Iraq. His job was to protect the U.S. and it's allies. He decided not to wait around to be attacked again, but to take the fight to our enemies. It was the right call and was supported by democrats and Americans.
1.) Iraq didn't attack the US on 9/11. He invaded the wrong country.

2.) You say Bush's job was to protect the US: By destabilizing the middle east, terrorist organizations such as Al Qaeda and ISIS arose by the vacuum Bush created. The world is not safer with ISIS. The US should have learned it's lesson about not being in the business of overtaking dictators. We speak so often of "the lesser of two evils" in this presidential election, but it applies here too. Another example is Hillary Clinton failing as Secretary of State by wanting Muammar Gaddafi's head and attacking Libya... We can rationalize it by saying Saddam and Gaddafi are bad men... but in the bigger picture, this was anything but "the right call" as you indicated.

The majority of Republicans, including Trump, agree this was definitely NOT the right call. The only presidential candidate that was against the invasion from day one is none other than Bernie Sanders.
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
1.) Iraq didn't attack the US on 9/11. He invaded the wrong country.

2.) You say Bush's job was to protect the US: By destabilizing the middle east, terrorist organizations such as Al Qaeda and ISIS arose by the vacuum Bush created. The world is not safer with ISIS. The US should have learned it's lesson about not being in the business of overtaking dictators. We speak so often of "the lesser of two evils" in this presidential election, but it applies here too. Another example is Hillary Clinton failing as Secretary of State by wanting Muammar Gaddafi's head and attacking Libya... We can rationalize it by saying Saddam and Gaddafi are bad men... but in the bigger picture, this was anything but "the right call" as you indicated.

The majority of Republicans, including Trump, agree this was definitely NOT the right call. The only presidential candidate that was against the invasion from day one is none other than Bernie Sanders.
I'm a history junkie. The deeper into the weeds, the better. Peacenik is quite fuzzy when it comes to history and the facts. I'll keep discussing these topics as long as people want to.

I can't see how Peacenik doesn't understand the reason Clinton was welcomed in Rwanda years following the genocide. The killers wished to thank him for allowing them to murder 800,000 members of a different tribe, without sending a small number of forces to save a single person. It's always the isolationists like peacenik who love to ignore the slaughter of innocents around the world, saying it is none of our business.

Germany didn't attack the U.S. on December 7th, 1941. We declared war on the wrong country. We then had to fight on two fronts.

See my point? You are not thinking like a military strategists. Or maybe you need to think more like a doctor treating a cancer that is spread around different countries. Saddam was destabilizing the Middle East. He was rewarding terrorists who attacked Israel and he had gassed his own people and he was torturing his own people. He was seeking help to build a WMD program. He had the potential to become a far greater threat than the guys living in caves in Afghanistan. It was the best strategy to send coalition forces to both locations. The majority of republicans still think it was the right move. What we learned is that we should have secured the borders after the country fell and kept out Iranian insurgents that brought in IED's.

50 years ago, there were 100 less democracies in the world. Democracy and giving people freedom, is the way to make the world safer. You do that by pushing back on violent dictators who feel it is their destiny to bring about the end of the world. Iraq was stabilizing until Obama pulled out our forces. The collapse of Syria was what created ISIS and they migrated to Iraq to create their caliphate. Obama allowed Assad to destroy his own people and gas them. Obama allowed the Russians to take charge. He allowed ISIS to grow from a few dozen to over 30,000 fighters. He was given the intelligence and he called them the JV team. He created the current situation. President Bush would have crushed ISIS as they started to grow and he would have removed Assad. Any President other than Obama and his weak secretary of state, would have made sure Russia was punished for invading the Ukraine.

The world is not safe. The world will not become safe until Jesus returns. It will become less and less safe. If you are Israel, you know this and look to the Word of God to plan your defense. People who claim to know God and read the Bible, would be fools to think we will make the world safe. The world is headed for Armageddon.

I may not like Hillary Clinton, at all, but she and her husband will send troops to fight almost as often as a republican would. President Clinton accomplished something historic when he defeated Milosevic using only air assets. Now he did promise to have all ground troops out of Serbia in one year and they were still there five years later, but that is the nature of stabilizing a region where races and nationalities want to murder each other. I will give Clinton a pass for wanting Gaddafi removed (or murdered). That was not a mistake. Reagan should have killed him years ago. It always comes down to who replaces the bad dictator.

Neither you nor peacenik can make a strong case against President Bush. All you do is Monday morning quarterback. I think it has been proven conclusively that even if you bake them a cake and promise to build them schools and hospitals, Islamic extremist's will still want to cut your head off. The first act of President Obama was to visit Egypt and apologize to them and embrace their leader, who they would later put in jail. Obama was that big a fool to think he could be nicer than past Presidents and that was going to win their hearts and minds. He has learned he was an idiot and he surrounded himself with even bigger idiots. Our foreign policy is unknown currently. He just wants to go golfing in Hawaii, at this point.
 

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
467
83
There are something like 1.3 million cops in this country. A very small percentage are "bad" cops. I don't know what that percentage is. No one really does. Even cops themselves can only make a educated guess. Maybe 5%? The problem is that is about 65,000 bad cops running around. To put it another way, that is about 1,100 bad cops per state. Then there are cop who maybe won't needlessly beat up people, or shoot them but who are disdainful of the public, don't like their jobs, and generally just arrogant, haughty and rude to civilians. Sometimes arresting them on flimsy pretenses to just hassle them. Maybe about 30% of cops fall into that category, according to my cousin, a former police officer. That is about another 400,000 cops. So we have around 465,000 cops, or about a third of the force that may not be qualified for the job. Or again, to put it another way, about an average of almost 10,000 cops per state that are not doing justice to the public.
Looking at these numbers, it is a wonder more people are not being beaten, killed, and abused by police officers on a daily basis.
To make matters worse, their fellow cops usually do nothing to try and prevent them form continuing their bad behavior. So many of them are just as guilty. They say nothing, do nothing, then they are passively encouraging this culture.

AND NOW THIS. See the article and video below. Cops in Texas telling a black woman that blacks are predisposed to more violence then whites. In this atmosphere no less, they are spouting this inane hatred. So now we have these officers who are not only prejudiced and ignorant, but they are also inciting violence and misunderstandings toward their comrades. Dumb words from them, if you ask me.

I am sure someone will come on here, the usual brigade, and defend this too.

[video]http://nypost.com/2016/07/22/cops-body-slam-teacher-say-blacks-have-violent-tendencies/[/video]

AUSTIN, Texas — Patrol car video shows a white Austin, Texas, police officer violently throwing a black woman to the ground during a traffic stop, followed by another white officer telling her black people have “violent tendencies” and whites are justifiably afraid.
Austin Police Chief Art Acevedo condemned both officers’ actions. He called the officer’s comments on the video “disturbing” and said a criminal investigation has been opened against the officer who arrested Breaion King.
The traffic stop happened in June 2015 but was not made public until the Austin American-Statesman published the video Thursday. Acevedo called a news conference hours later and said both officers have been taken off street patrol and are on desk duty pending new internal investigations, which he said will include both officers’ conduct in the year since the incident.
The video is surfacing amid heightened nationwide tension over police treatment of black people.
“For those that think life is perfect for people of color, I want you to listen to that conversation and tell me we don’t have social issues in this nation,” said Acevedo, who is Hispanic. “Issues of bias. Issues of racism. Issues of people being looked at different because of their color.”
In one of two videos, Officer Patrick Spradlin is heard talking to King, who was pulled over for speeding, about race while driving her to jail.
“Why are so many people afraid of black people?” Spradlin asks.
King replies that she is also trying to figure that out.
“I can give you a really good idea why it might be that way,” he said. “Violent tendencies.”
Spradlin goes on to say that “I don’t blame” white people for being afraid because of violence in the black community. “Some of them, because of their appearance and whatnot, some of them are very intimidating,” he says.
The newspaper identified King as an elementary school teacher. Her attorney did not immediately return a message seeking comment.
Acevedo said King did not file a complaint after the arrest and that he did not know about the traffic stop until this week, saying his subordinates should have previously alerted him to the video.
King told the newspaper that the encounter changed how she views police. Acevedo said she was pulled over for driving 15 mph over the speed limit when Officer Bryan Richter ordered her out of the car. The video shows him nearly throwing her into an adjacent truck while trying to place her under arrest in a Wendy’s parking lot.
“I’ve become fearful to live my life,” King told the newspaper. “I would rather stay home. I’ve become afraid of the people who are supposed to protect me and take care of me.”
Richter can be heard in the video ordering King to “stop resisting” as he orders her out of the car. The angle of the video doesn’t fully show King while she is inside the car.
Richter orders King to put her hands behind her back while the two struggle on the ground.
Richter has been a police officer since 2010 and Spradlin since 2001, according to Austin police. Listed phone numbers for the officers could not immediately be found.
Acevedo said he reviewed the video Wednesday with black community leaders for nearly 3 ½ hours. He said they included Fatima Mann, an activist with the Austin Justice Coalition, who told reporters outside the police station that she didn’t understand how no one in the department had previously raised concerns about the video.
“If that was a white woman, would he have yanked her out … and slammed her on the ground? Most of us could say absolutely not,” Mann said. “But for reason, for some strange reason, when people look like me, we’re more of a threat, and that means we get treated and thrown around as if we don’t matter.”
The Austin police union said in a statement that it understands the public’s reaction to Richter’s response and that Spradlin’s comments were “wrong and not reflective of the values and beliefs of the men and women who serve this community.”



Cops body-slam teacher, say blacks have ‘violent tendencies’ | New York Post
 

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
467
83
[video=youtube;ev5bkLilnio]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev5bkLilnio[/video]
 

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
467
83
As long as this stuff continue, people need to speak out against it. If not, we will be as guilty as the "good" cops not saying or doing anything to top their fellow officers.
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
So you found another video of another non-compliant person resisting arrest. Big deal. Maybe we need people to pass IQ tests in order to be given drivers license. She actually thought that she could evade police and avoid a ticket for speeding by pulling into a private parking lot. What an idiot. When an officer asks for id and says keep your feet in the car, especially in light or recent events, what should the woman have done? Nobody seems to think drivers have any responsibility to obey the laws or obey the police. You included.

I will go on the record stating your cousin is wrong if he believes that 30% of police are abusing people's rights. I would guess that less than 1% of police officers are committing unlawful acts against citizens. So therefore the numbers you made up based on your cousin are fictitious.

I know how much time you have spent looking to find a video of a police officer abusing someone who is fully compliant and following instructions. You just can't find even one example. That should tell you how few officers are misbehaving. But it isn't going to stop you from obsessing about it and making up numbers based on your cousin's say so.

Were you on this site during the Trayvon Martin shooting? Care to share your posts? I bet you referred to George Zimmerman as a wanna be cop who murdered a defenseless child. I'm wondering how you felt when you discovered the facts and realized you were completely wrong in condemning Zimmerman.
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
113
0
So you found another video of another non-compliant person resisting arrest. Big deal. Maybe we need people to pass IQ tests in order to be given drivers license. She actually thought that she could evade police and avoid a ticket for speeding by pulling into a private parking lot. What an idiot. When an officer asks for id and says keep your feet in the car, especially in light or recent events, what should the woman have done? Nobody seems to think drivers have any responsibility to obey the laws or obey the police. You included.

I will go on the record stating your cousin is wrong if he believes that 30% of police are abusing people's rights. I would guess that less than 1% of police officers are committing unlawful acts against citizens. So therefore the numbers you made up based on your cousin are fictitious.

I know how much time you have spent looking to find a video of a police officer abusing someone who is fully compliant and following instructions. You just can't find even one example. That should tell you how few officers are misbehaving. But it isn't going to stop you from obsessing about it and making up numbers based on your cousin's say so.

Were you on this site during the Trayvon Martin shooting? Care to share your posts? I bet you referred to George Zimmerman as a wanna be cop who murdered a defenseless child. I'm wondering how you felt when you discovered the facts and realized you were completely wrong in condemning Zimmerman.
You make an important point. 99% of the time it is people's stupidity that gets them beaten down by police.
 
V

Voldemort

Guest
See my point? You are not thinking like a military strategists. Or maybe you need to think more like a doctor treating a cancer that is spread around different countries. Saddam was destabilizing the Middle East. He was rewarding terrorists who attacked Israel and he had gassed his own people and he was torturing his own people.
I read your long-winded posts and notice there is always something personal you make to the people you converse with. I'm just going to respond to substantive content in an attempt to understand your position and point of view better.

I fully understand you think invading Iraq "was the right call" in spite of Republicans and Democrats actually agreeing it wasn't the right call...

Did you also support Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's position on going for Gaddafi's head and attacking Libya because he, like Saddam, was a threat to the world?
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
[video=youtube;ev5bkLilnio]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev5bkLilnio[/video]
I'm no expert on these things, but she was resisting arrest and it appears that she played a part in how she ended up on the ground with how wildly she was moving.

I mean it looked bad, but she doesn't appear to have any noteworthy injuries. A real, WWF, style body-slam would've wrecked her physically.

Lord knows I'm critical of police use of force. That event in Miami the other day was ridiculous- shooting a contrite therapist with a rifle while aiming for an autistic person sitting on the ground?! The best reasoning the cop could come up with was "I don't know?!"

The therapist may not have to work again with the settlement coming his way. Pretty much a done deal in court. But this? Arguably justified use of force.

Thank God we have cameras, witnesses, and experts. Our legal system is far from perfect, but it does help sort these things out while people are fixn' to turn everything into a politically-driven witch hunt.

/rant
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
Also, that autistic kid or his family (whoever manages his assets) will get a good slice too if they can prove he underwent psychological trauma.
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
As long as this stuff continue, people need to speak out against it. If not, we will be as guilty as the "good" cops not saying or doing anything to top their fellow officers.
Here is an example of what you are often guilty of;

Michael Brown shooting as discussed on this site before the fact were known...

The Shooting of Michael Brown
The Execution of an 18 year old kid by police is all over the news at the moment.
Shooting of Michael Brown - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Have the resident right wingers on this forum come up with reasons why he deserved it, or why he was doing the wrong thing?

Or hasn't their been enough time to fabricate lies about it yet?

I'm just curious.​


________________________________________________________________________

Treyvon Martin shooting remarks on CC;

If Zimmerman had stayed in the car, Martin would still be alive today. Voice experts have already examined the voice on the 911 tape and it's 99.9% sure that it's not Zimmerman's voice screaming for help. The one who had the right to "Stand his ground" was the unarmed kid walking down the street on the phone talking to his girlfriend (the entire time...proven by phone records) on his way home to give his younger cousin a bag of skittles that he just picked up at the corner store. Yeah...really sounds like this kid was up to no good.

This kid was profiled by Zimmerman, approached by Zimmerman, shoved by Zimmerman (according to girlfriend on the phone with Martin at the time) Martin tried to defend himself and was shot and killed by Zimmerman in the process.

Zimmerman has already proved that he will lie when he is confronted under pressure. According to Zimmerman's testimony, Martin walked up to his car and asked Zimmerman "Why are you following me?" Zimmerman answered "I'm not following you." That was a lie.... on the 911 tape the dispatch asked Zimmerman "Are you following him?" Zimmerman answered "Yes" dispatch replied "We don't need you to do that."

If one can believe Zimmerman's account, which I don't, When Martin walked up to his car and asked Zimmerman "Why are you following me?" Why didn't Zimmerman say to Martin, "Hi"...."I'm George Zimmerman Neighborhood Watch Captain and I was just wondering if you live in the area and may I ask who you are?"..... "Oh..I'm Travon, my Dad's fiance' lives just up the street and I'm on my way there."... "Oh", "Ok".."I'm just doing my job, we have had some break-in's in this neighborhood and I'm sorry if I made you uncomfortable by following you." "Ok..Good night"...

Nobody had to die.

Bottom line..Zimmerman took the law into his own hands and he is going to have to face the consequences of his actions - Dude 653
The one thing Zimmer is guilty of is showing very poor judgement after the 911 operator told him not to follow Trayvon Martin
____________________________________________________________________________________

When you read comments by some people, it is obvious they have little concern for the facts. Regarding Trayvon Martin, no 911 operator told Zimmerman not to follow Trayvon Martin. Citizens have a lawful right to follow suspicious people in their neighborhood.

George Zimmerman did not take the law into his own hands as Dude suggested. He lawfully defended himself from a vicious felony assault.

Not one of the three people who made these comments above returned later to say they were wrong and the facts during the trial proved they were wrong. They simply moved on to the next headline shooting and made more uninformed comments, usually taking sides against law enforcement. Just like you seem to do.


 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
I read your long-winded posts and notice there is always something personal you make to the people you converse with. I'm just going to respond to substantive content in an attempt to understand your position and point of view better.

I fully understand you think invading Iraq "was the right call" in spite of Republicans and Democrats actually agreeing it wasn't the right call...

Did you also support Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's position on going for Gaddafi's head and attacking Libya because he, like Saddam, was a threat to the world?
Almost all republicans and almost all democrats thought removing Saddam was the right thing to do. The reasons they gave was that he was working to build up a WMD program. Years later many of the politicians who supported the war, had a change of mind during their re-election campaigns. No surprise.

Hillary's position was somewhat different with Libya. She wanted Gaddafi out but she didn't want a U.S. presence in the area. That was the Obama doctrine. Lead from behind. There was to be no stabilizing forces to help install a working government and a partial democracy. It was more like crossing your fingers and hoping for the best. This is why Benghazi happened. Clinton didn't want a larger security force there, despite the rapidly deteriorating conditions and multiple requests for added security forces. Her decisions got those men killed. I would have supported President Obama going into Syria and killing Assad and then working with allies to install a government that wasn't influenced by Iranian radicals. I would have supported President Obama going into Libya with allies and removing Gaddafi and setting up some government that suited the people and kept Iran from sending in insurgents. Did you support a foreign policy of leading from behind? I doubt it. That is called following, not leading. Did you support Clinton's "reset" with Russia? Starting fresh with them? Telling them that we won't react if they want to invade neighboring countries, even NATO countries. What sort of foreign policy have we been acting under these last few years. Can you define it?
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
You make an important point. 99% of the time it is people's stupidity that gets them beaten down by police.
I have a friend who is a nurse. You have to be fairly smart to make it through nursing school. Yet he is an idiot. One night he was driving home from dinner and a few drinks and saw a police officer behind him trying to get him to stop. He was only a half mile from his parents home, so he kept driving. one block away from their home, he had this great idea. He would pull into a neighbors driveway, get out of the car, and somehow he felt he would be protected from arrest because he was on private property. The story got better. He threw his dads BMW keys in some bushes. The police officer parked right behind his dads BMW, to block him in. The officer gave him a field sobriety test, which he failed, but while it was being conducted, the police car had over-heated and caught fire in the engine compartment. The officer asked Todd to give him the car keys so he could move his car away from the flames and Todd said he tossed the keys in a bush. So his dads BMW caught fire and burned up and Todd was arrested and charged with DWI. I think being that stupid should force you to ride a bike and never be allowed to drive.