News sources

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
P

persistent

Guest
#22
This abc.net,au


to an aging population. Fertility rights. In other words, the number
Loaded: 67.11%


Play
Current Time 1:08
/
Duration 3:16

HQ
Captions
Fullscreen

Global population projected to reach 8 billion this week
Mute
100

View on Watch
More videos
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,499
1,076
113
#23
Uhhh... this is not the AP or Reuters news service. This is Christian Chat. Did you think you were writing for one of those companies?

The AP and Reuters have made it their policy to not use that term anymore. I made up nothing. Wake up. That which you hail as objective is not.
I don't know what either of those two things are so elaborate maybe?
 
G

Gojira

Guest
#24
I don't know what either of those two things are so elaborate maybe?
Both orgs have made it official that they will be politically correct in their descriptions. I.e., they don't want to use terminology that pisses off the Left, like "illegal alien".

Other examples from other sources include the LA & NY Times' decisions to ban all writing countering the LW global warming narrative. When Hamas starts firing rockets into Israel breaking a cease-fire, it's "fighting breaks out" in the headlines, not "Hamas breaks cease-fire".

I watch FNC, despite their rightist leanings because they are are only counter-narrative, and at least their opinion people TELL YOU they're opinion people. They're not editorialists telling you they're objective reporters.

And, sorry if I got snippy with you.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,609
4,168
113
mywebsite.us
#30
None of the "fact checkers" are reliable today where truth is concerned. (If there is [even] one in existence today that is trustworthy, I would sure like to know what it is.)

Back-in-the-day, when Snopes first appeared - it seemed to be pretty good - but, not any more - they got "bought" many years ago.