There are some things that are important to consider. Putin is former KGB, his agenda is unclear and he is somehow lurking in the shadows. To him the distrust between the generals and the Trump administration is better than what he could be hoping for, granted this distrust really exists in a so significant manner that it has a potential for causing problems.
What I believe, is that Putin is seeking some sort of agreement with the U.S., so he can take care of important matters at hand in other parts of the world. He's constructing a new super power, while trying to reduce American influence. What will Europe look like in 10 years, without American presence? Hard to tell, but I'm sure it will be an even more divided part of the world than it is as of today.
Germany will most likely grow stronger. Some uncertainty due to the high number of immigrants, but still. France has a potential, but will not be able to cope with Germany. Britain is, like the U.S., en route to isolationism.
Trump needs to know what kind of player he is up against. The Russians don't think like we do, they are maybe not that patience as the Chinese, but it is clear that they are manipulating their way to yet again become a super power...or, THE Super Power.
In response to your post:
1. "I believe, is that Putin is seeking some sort of agreement with the U.S., so he can take care of important matters at hand in other parts of the world."
Of course.
I think everyone understands that.
But, there's nothing wrong with making agreements with some people, so you can go focus on problems with other people.
That isn't necessarily bad.
We need to do that too.
Also, in politics, much like war, and even business, you don't have the luxury of only playing ball with your best friends... your reach needs to be a little broader than that.
2. "He's constructing a new super power."
That seems unlikely.
Though he probably would like to expand Russian "influence", and get some new pipelines running.
3. "What will Europe look like in 10 years without American presence?"
Well, Europe is a pretty big mess right NOW.
That's why the U.K left the European Union, and France and Italy are trying to get out of it... as are others.
As far as Europe being "without American presence"... I don't see that happening, and the more countries that leave the European Union, the greater our influence will actually be in Europe.
4. "Germany will most likely grow stronger."
Germany is a huge mess right now, and there whole society is collapsing.
It's only a matter of time before their economy follows.
I haven't checked the numbers, but I'm pretty sure we could look up all the data, and we'd find their economy is GETTING WORSE.
* It isn't possible to bring a million jobless refugees into a small country without taking a massive hit against both your economy and society at large.
5. "Britain, like the U.S. is enroute to isolationism."
- Well, deciding we don't want the U.N. deciding policies for our citizens... that's not isolationism.
- Deciding we should STOP blowing up small countries... that's not isolationism.
- Deciding we want to make changes to our international trade policies, so we STOP LOSING MONEY ON TRADES, is not isolationism.
- Britain is dealing with similar issues, only worse... the EU was making them accept all kinds of laws that NOBODY IN THEIR COUNTRY EVER VOTED ON... and they got sick of it.
6. "Trump needs to know what kind of player he is up against."
- Trump has been doing international deals, all over the planet, for a long time, it's not like he's naive.
- Trump may be irritating, or he may have policies some don't like, but irritating and disagreeable do not equate to naive.
- Trump is building a full team of people, who's full time job is to KNOW all these international issues, stay on top of them, communicate with our intelligence agencies, make good decisions, and keep the white house abreast of everything.
* It's very unlikely that Trump, with years of international experience, multiple intelligence agencies collecting data, and full teams of professionals who do nothing but attend to these matters... it's hard to imagine that with all of that, you somehow know more about Putin than Trump does.
It's fine to dislike him, or disagree with him, or whatever.
But I think these particular statements are, for the most part, ungrounded in real data.
These all sound like "opinion" pieces from the left.
It sounds to me like you've been reading the Huffington Post again.
: )