For the most part, I don't think it does because it's not like she's there to preach or prophecy. She's there to advise the president on grants and whatever interactions the government and "community organizations" may have. IOW, Her position in the government isn't a Church ministry- it's a government post; and there is no hard church doctrine against women in government posts.
Historically, the government has considered "community organizations" as having an overall positive impact on the population, and that giving them funding ultimately saved money on the back end (lowering crime, etc.). As a result, it was no-harm/no-foul. If it's working, don't try to fix it.
Her job/office identifies which churches/community organizations are most likely to compliment civil government. When an organization get people to behave/govern themselves; it is a more cost-effective society.
Unfortunately, not all "community organizations/churches" are effective, or even benevolent. If this office does a good job; then society does benefit. And as I showed earlier, if they do a bad job- we inadvertently fund adversaries.
Historically, the government has considered "community organizations" as having an overall positive impact on the population, and that giving them funding ultimately saved money on the back end (lowering crime, etc.). As a result, it was no-harm/no-foul. If it's working, don't try to fix it.
Her job/office identifies which churches/community organizations are most likely to compliment civil government. When an organization get people to behave/govern themselves; it is a more cost-effective society.
Unfortunately, not all "community organizations/churches" are effective, or even benevolent. If this office does a good job; then society does benefit. And as I showed earlier, if they do a bad job- we inadvertently fund adversaries.
