Poll - Who won the first Trump/Clinton debate?
- Thread starter Billyd
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Obviously, since you cannot address the issues but continue to make personal attacks, it is your concession that you have lost the debate and you want the thread to be closed just like the other ones.
It is very sad, indeed, that we cannot have a reasoned debate on this forum without members of the far right continuing to make attacks in lieu of reasoned argument.
yeah right
Even the Baltimore Sun endorses Hillary:
[h=1]The BaltimoreSun endorses Hillary Clinton for president[/h]Source: The Baltimore Sun
We endorse Hillary Clinton for president. But let's be honest, you are not surprised by that. Although The Sun's record on political endorsements is more mixed than many might expect (the paper backed Richard Nixon three times and Franklin D. Roosevelt only once), we have supported the Democratic nominee for four presidential elections in a row. And this year, we have not been guarded at expressing our admiration for Ms. Clinton's experience, depth of knowledge, steadiness and leadership, nor have we hesitated to point out the utter lack of those qualities in her Republican opponent, Donald Trump.
We are at a loss as to what more we could say that would persuade anyone who is still undecided in this election. So we won't try. Instead, we offer up an endorsement in the words of others — newspapers and government, military and business leaders — who have consistent track records of backing Republicans but who feel compelled to support Ms. Clinton this year.
...........
"Time and again history has shown that when demagogues have gotten power or come close to getting power, it usually does not end well," former Hewlett Packard CEO Meg Whitman told the New York Times. "There is no basis in thinking that our democracy is so strong, our checks and balances so finely hedged, that no single person can lead us off the precipice. Trump can," Mike Fernandez, a Florida health care executive and major Republican donor wrote in the Miami Herald. "His convention-speech comment, 'I alone can fix it,' should make every American shudder," the Houston Chronicle wrote. "He is, we believe, a danger to the Republic." The Dallas Morning News observed, "Trump's values are hostile to conservatism. He plays on fear — exploiting base instincts of xenophobia, racism and misogyny — to bring out the worst in all of us, rather than the best."
This is not an ordinary election offering voters a choice between a more liberal and a more conservative candidate for president. This time, one candidate stands in the broad tradition of American leadership that has made this the greatest, most powerful and most prosperous nation in history. The other would have us trade that legacy for a cult of personality. The choice is clear. Hillary Clinton has the skills, experience and values to navigate these challenging times. Donald Trump, meanwhile, is utterly unsuited and unprepared for the presidency. But don't just take our word for it. This year, you don't have to.
Read more: Clinton for president - Baltimore Sun
Even the Baltimore Sun endorses Hillary:
[h=1]The BaltimoreSun endorses Hillary Clinton for president[/h]Source: The Baltimore Sun
We endorse Hillary Clinton for president. But let's be honest, you are not surprised by that. Although The Sun's record on political endorsements is more mixed than many might expect (the paper backed Richard Nixon three times and Franklin D. Roosevelt only once), we have supported the Democratic nominee for four presidential elections in a row. And this year, we have not been guarded at expressing our admiration for Ms. Clinton's experience, depth of knowledge, steadiness and leadership, nor have we hesitated to point out the utter lack of those qualities in her Republican opponent, Donald Trump.
We are at a loss as to what more we could say that would persuade anyone who is still undecided in this election. So we won't try. Instead, we offer up an endorsement in the words of others — newspapers and government, military and business leaders — who have consistent track records of backing Republicans but who feel compelled to support Ms. Clinton this year.
...........
"Time and again history has shown that when demagogues have gotten power or come close to getting power, it usually does not end well," former Hewlett Packard CEO Meg Whitman told the New York Times. "There is no basis in thinking that our democracy is so strong, our checks and balances so finely hedged, that no single person can lead us off the precipice. Trump can," Mike Fernandez, a Florida health care executive and major Republican donor wrote in the Miami Herald. "His convention-speech comment, 'I alone can fix it,' should make every American shudder," the Houston Chronicle wrote. "He is, we believe, a danger to the Republic." The Dallas Morning News observed, "Trump's values are hostile to conservatism. He plays on fear — exploiting base instincts of xenophobia, racism and misogyny — to bring out the worst in all of us, rather than the best."
This is not an ordinary election offering voters a choice between a more liberal and a more conservative candidate for president. This time, one candidate stands in the broad tradition of American leadership that has made this the greatest, most powerful and most prosperous nation in history. The other would have us trade that legacy for a cult of personality. The choice is clear. Hillary Clinton has the skills, experience and values to navigate these challenging times. Donald Trump, meanwhile, is utterly unsuited and unprepared for the presidency. But don't just take our word for it. This year, you don't have to.
Read more: Clinton for president - Baltimore Sun
right wingers like to accuse Hillary of dishonesty - here is evidence of Trump violating the law - so who is the dishonest one?
There you go..... I missed my cue again.
Maybe one day when you grow up I might remember my cue.
Maybe one day when you grow up I might remember my cue.
Last edited:
[h=1]'Don't vote for Trump,' says USA Today in first presidential endorsement in its history[/h]Source: Los Angeles Times
USA Today broke its 34-year tradition of not endorsing in a presidential race, publishing a scathing argument against voting for Donald Trump.
The editorial board unanimously found Trump "unfit for the presidency" and the editorial, published Thursday, goes on to list the reasons why, among them: his "erratic" behavior and his "checkered" business past.
The anti-Trump sentiment does not translate into an enthusiastic Clinton endorsement. The piece notes that although some editorial board members admire her record, others have "serious reservations about Clinton’s sense of entitlement, her lack of candor and her extreme carelessness in handling classified information."
The editorial urges readers to follow their convictions, whether that means voting for Clinton, a third-party candidate, a write-in or by focusing on down-ticket races.
The piece ends on an unequivocal note.
"Whatever you do, however, resist the siren song of a dangerous demagogue. By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump."
Read more: 'Don't vote for Trump,' says USA Today in first presidential endorsement in its history - LA Times
USA Today broke its 34-year tradition of not endorsing in a presidential race, publishing a scathing argument against voting for Donald Trump.
The editorial board unanimously found Trump "unfit for the presidency" and the editorial, published Thursday, goes on to list the reasons why, among them: his "erratic" behavior and his "checkered" business past.
The anti-Trump sentiment does not translate into an enthusiastic Clinton endorsement. The piece notes that although some editorial board members admire her record, others have "serious reservations about Clinton’s sense of entitlement, her lack of candor and her extreme carelessness in handling classified information."
The editorial urges readers to follow their convictions, whether that means voting for Clinton, a third-party candidate, a write-in or by focusing on down-ticket races.
The piece ends on an unequivocal note.
"Whatever you do, however, resist the siren song of a dangerous demagogue. By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump."
Read more: 'Don't vote for Trump,' says USA Today in first presidential endorsement in its history - LA Times