Indeed. But if a minority of people who commit incest would ask for their right of marrying their brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers (God forbid!) on what basis would you refuse to them this right? I asked many people about this and they admitted that since you lose the landmark of marriage (between a man and a woman) and recognize the non-sense of a marriage between two men, you have to accept marriage between first degree cousins, brothers etc., too.
So Now We Have 'Gay Theology'?! - Article by Chick Publications
- Thread starter ChosenbyHim
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
On the basis that incest is proven to lead to pregnancies wherein genetic abnormalities are extremely common, often fatal, and detrimental to both the mother and the child's life. A mother a father having seven alleles in common is biologically injurious. YOU are the one saying that we have to accept marriage between a brother and sister if we accept gay marriage on the principal that a minority ask for it, but it's a false correlation because being gay and being incestuous are two very different things. The view that legalizing homosexuality requires the legalization of incest certainly isn't the viewpoint of most if not all legal principalities, nor of the scientific community, nor the majority of gay people.
Being gay doesn't throw up such problems.
Being gay doesn't throw up such problems.
Homosexuality also leads to sexual disease from which the most horrible (and common) one is AIDS.
In islamic countries marriage between first degree cousins is something normal. I believe that if a brother wants to marry his sister (or brother), authorities who allow marriage between two men or polygamy (like in the state of Utah) don't have any basis on which they can tell them "this is not normal".
In islamic countries marriage between first degree cousins is something normal. I believe that if a brother wants to marry his sister (or brother), authorities who allow marriage between two men or polygamy (like in the state of Utah) don't have any basis on which they can tell them "this is not normal".
M
This is exactly where we are without God. It is why we live in a society where anything goes, it's a godless, messed up society with blurred lines - so we overstep them and that's acceptable as we become our own little gods. How many times I have heard the line "it's not hurting anyone so what's the problem". I wonder how they will explain this one away as they each meet their maker.
First degree cousins can marry in the UK. Just cause you believe it lol doesn't make it true.It is not the same thing. Plus, it is not necessarily what the man said, but the principle on which gay marriage is acceptable. On the same principle you can accept other sexual perversions too on the condition that it is a consensual act.
So, the transexual was actually being consequent in his madness.
So, the transexual was actually being consequent in his madness.
That was the primary line of defense the transman used when Christians would confront his point of view. It's not hurting anyone so what's the problem. It's consensual between the people involved and that is what matters.
He argued sex with his cousin was perfectly OK. A first cousin! Save for being gay, I'd have said, imagine the children. But that was OK too. Because inbreeding doesn't pose any risks. (cough)
I agree. The lines of morality and right living are being blurred. And more rapidly as the years pass. And you notice? In order for those lines to be blurred, and eventually erased by law, the one thing that has to be under siege first is the religion that reiterates those lines and preaches they are inviolable.
And that's where the godless activist structure comes in. Groups like Freedom From Religion Foundation, numerous so called humanist groups, attack the faith and hope to put it in a closet while allowing the howling demonic behaviors in Hell out of theirs. As a matter of equality, in the name of tolerance, at the behest of the Orwellian style Ministry of Truth, Political Correctness.
And if you disagree, you're a bigot.
That label that makes you invisible because you aren't one who testifies to the Hellion anthem: If it feels good do it!
He argued sex with his cousin was perfectly OK. A first cousin! Save for being gay, I'd have said, imagine the children. But that was OK too. Because inbreeding doesn't pose any risks. (cough)
I agree. The lines of morality and right living are being blurred. And more rapidly as the years pass. And you notice? In order for those lines to be blurred, and eventually erased by law, the one thing that has to be under siege first is the religion that reiterates those lines and preaches they are inviolable.
And that's where the godless activist structure comes in. Groups like Freedom From Religion Foundation, numerous so called humanist groups, attack the faith and hope to put it in a closet while allowing the howling demonic behaviors in Hell out of theirs. As a matter of equality, in the name of tolerance, at the behest of the Orwellian style Ministry of Truth, Political Correctness.
And if you disagree, you're a bigot.
That label that makes you invisible because you aren't one who testifies to the Hellion anthem: If it feels good do it!
Your neo marxist utopia has never worked nor ever will work so long as man's heart is EVIL. Even in the Millennium under the best conditions man's true evil will be made manifest as he runs to side with satan after he's loosed from his chains.
There are always the strong manipulators over powering the weak, where even in countries that are supposed to be egalitarian like Soviet Russia or Red China, you have the elite at the top wining and dining while the 'masses' are laid low. I'm sure you've read Animal Farm if it hasn't yet been banned for university students. As such utopian equality is a pipe dream and squares not with the reality of man's depraved heart.
You say consensual gay relations hurt no one? Healthcare costs have skyrocketed due to the epidemic of aids to name one let alone now many people do not have the choice to live by their conscience and refuse to serve them.
So much for personal choice.
There are always the strong manipulators over powering the weak, where even in countries that are supposed to be egalitarian like Soviet Russia or Red China, you have the elite at the top wining and dining while the 'masses' are laid low. I'm sure you've read Animal Farm if it hasn't yet been banned for university students. As such utopian equality is a pipe dream and squares not with the reality of man's depraved heart.
You say consensual gay relations hurt no one? Healthcare costs have skyrocketed due to the epidemic of aids to name one let alone now many people do not have the choice to live by their conscience and refuse to serve them.
So much for personal choice.
Last edited:
My gay neighbors, are upper middle class (six figure incomes). They have no children. The live in a monogamous relationship. The spend at least 10% of their incomes on charities (including our unwed parents mission (Christian run pregnancy center). They are healthier than most Christians of their age that I know. In short they are not burdens to society. They are lost and going to Hell. Sadly, they know that too. I'll be willing to bet you that the couple I've described here is the typical gay couple. I pray today that will open a door into their heart, and give me an opportunity to share the Gospel with them and save them from the future that they now have.
It is the point. They are just as lost as anyone who is lost in any sin. As long as we turn away from them because they are lost in a "filthy" lifestyle, they will remain lost. Which is more important, whether or not a sin is legal, or the salvation of each person lost in the sin? When we make a sin illegal, it doesn't save a single person. When we lead a person out of a sinful lifestyle, it doesn't matter whether the sin is illegal or not. I'm not saying that we shouldn't have laws that make sins illegal. I'm saying that whether the sin is legal or not, our responsibility as Christians is to take the Gospel to everyone. I pray that I am able to do.
Now that....is a liberal.
Look at the rate of sexually transmitted disease within the homosexual community. Not just aids but hepititis and the regular std's.
The average lifespan is a lot shorter as well.
There is destruction of the anal canal.
What a gay couple shows to the community may be very different to what happens behind doors. When you engage is such perversion, it will show up in other areas of your life as well.
If we are such idiots, why come to a christian site to spread what the majority of us think is foolishness, at best.
I know why...talking to pot smoking low information liberals has to be very boring.
Look at the rate of sexually transmitted disease within the homosexual community. Not just aids but hepititis and the regular std's.
The average lifespan is a lot shorter as well.
There is destruction of the anal canal.
What a gay couple shows to the community may be very different to what happens behind doors. When you engage is such perversion, it will show up in other areas of your life as well.
If we are such idiots, why come to a christian site to spread what the majority of us think is foolishness, at best.
I know why...talking to pot smoking low information liberals has to be very boring.
