Things are changing under Trump. Lets keep count:

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
21,182
7,251
113
63
I asked how are condoms and sex changes relevant
They are examples of things not reported over long periods of time. But another poster wants us to believe that a government report was done in 2 weeks. I find that difficult to believe.
 
Mar 19, 2011
13,348
1,208
113
You gave a report attributed to no one. Who is the source of the story?
I provided a source you just said my source is lying
Last time I'm going to ask before I just put you on ignore what does condoms have to do with this and why are you sending condoms to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STDs a bad thing
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
21,182
7,251
113
63
I provided a source you just said my source is lying
Last time I'm going to ask before I just put you on ignore what does condoms have to do with this and why are you sending condoms to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STDs a bad thing
The source you provided was citing another source but never gives the original source. How can the information be verified. You are accepting information as true that you have no idea whether it's true or not.
And you continue to be disingenuous. I explained my references to other things as examples of things that were never reported. The reason I did so was in answer to a source given by another poster who wants us to believe an individual responsible for reporting government activities never did so on a variety of topics but has suddenly taken their job seriously the last 2 weeks on the topic of food.

They may be telling "a" story, but they are not telling "the" story.
 
Apr 21, 2021
8,756
3,815
113
I provided a source you just said my source is lying
Last time I'm going to ask before I just put you on ignore what does condoms have to do with this and why are you sending condoms to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STDs a bad thing
I doubt any condoms have actually been sent to anyone. Donald's administration is claiming that Muskrat discovered $50,000 was spent to send condoms to Gaza; some reports have said they were sent to the Taliban. I don't think they know what they're talking about. And since Muskrat refuses to provide any actual data or proof, it's probably just a lot of nonsense.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
7,353
2,943
113
I have no reliable source at present, but neither do you. The difference is you are making claims you cannot verify. That's dishonest.
As per usual, let's bring out the moralizing, cause the condom story has been verified. :rolleyes:

Wow oh why do I ever respond to you..same ole, same ole.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
21,182
7,251
113
63
As per usual, let's bring out the moralizing.

Wow oh why do I ever respond to you..same ole, same ole.
When you can't dazzle with truth, you attempt to persuade with junk. Either give a source that can be verified or stop presenting things as truth that aren't.
Do you still believe the Russian hoax?
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
21,182
7,251
113
63
As per usual, let's bring out the moralizing, cause the condom story has been verified. :rolleyes:

Wow oh why do I ever respond to you..same ole, same ole.
And I didn't address you. You responded to a post of mine. I simply responded to your lack of a reliable source. All you had to do was give the proof for your claim.

What is it called when someone posits a claim without proof?
 

Eli1

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2022
5,901
2,629
113
47
And I didn't address you. You responded to a post of mine. I simply responded to your lack of a reliable source. All you had to do was give the proof for your claim.

What is it called when someone posits a claim without proof?
The liberals need constant reminders on WHY they lost.
Assume that what they're saying is true, even if it's a lie.
Then remind them that their lie was greater then the current "lie".
I think Republicans will win again based on the conduct and denial of facing reality of many Dems. Their latest performance of the DNC was evidence to this.

#WINNING
 
Mar 19, 2011
13,348
1,208
113
When you can't dazzle with truth, you attempt to persuade with junk. Either give a source that can be verified or stop presenting things as truth that aren't.
Do you still believe the Russian hoax?
Russia didn't directly interfere with the election but what they did was create thousands of fake Facebook accounts to propagandize Americans