I missed that, I did hear from eyewitnesses that the FBI entered with backpacks, so they brought stuff into the house, and I also heard that they wanted the cameras turned off (a request that was rejected) and I heard that if they did plant evidence they would have video evidence, but I haven't heard that Trump said they did plant evidence. Can you provide a citation for that claim?
Can you tell us what statutes they are going after him for? I heard that it was for stealing nuclear secrets but the warrant didn't say that, I also heard that it was for documents that were packed up by the GSA and if the documents were packed up by someone other than Trump then there would be no violation by Trump, so obviously that couldn't be the statute you are talking about. So please, educate us, what is the statute they are going for?
How is this making it worse for him? What exactly is the statute that they are going after?
Here is what I did hear that they are claiming
They are claiming, on Maria Bartiromos show this morning, that the FBI agents involved in the raid were involved in Russiagate. That makes anything taken in this raid poisoned, the rule of law states that you cannot enter any evidence that is from the poisoned tree. Nothing from this raid can result in a criminal conviction, at least not in a real court