Your link is to a CNN story that says one thing in its headline, and something quite different in the body of the story. In short, it lies.
Despite the wording in the headline, the reader will see upon going through the story that Fox made no apologies for any inaccurate comments or reports it or it's reporters voiced regarding Muslims. It did apologize for one non-staff guest who exaggerated in labeling Birmingham, England "totally Muslim" -- it is 22% Islamic, according to UK census info. Fox did apologize for a slightly misdrawing a map of seven "no-go" zones in France -- and that affected only one of those zones, and only by a couple city blocks.
Fox did not retract information regarding the isolation of the no-go or the fact that police officers do not go into those neighborhoods. In fact, multiple news organization have supported those statements as fact in the week and a half since the Charlie Hebdo attack, the slaying of an unarmed traffic officer, and murder of four innocent French Jews in a deli -- all the work of Islamic terrorists in Paris.
So, one must ask, any particular reason CNN chose to attempt to discredit Fox when it had no grounds to do so? Better yet, why would you listen to, watch, or read CNN knowing they were complicit in that effort? And why should we pay any attention to anything you post in the future, knowing you were more than happy to spread CNN's lies?
I went on a date tonight with a woman who ordinarily lives in Birmingham. We got on to the topic of philosophy, a shared interest, and I asked her what she thought of organized religion. After a few carefully considered words on her disagreement with the dogmatic nature of various fundamentalist Islamic and Christian practices, she said something profoundly intelligent, in my eyes. She said ''but the dogmatism of secularism can be just as ignorant'', and went on to ask me ''Have you heard about what Fox news are saying about Birmingham?'' Then the two of us shared a belly laugh.
Birmingham is about as ''Sharia no-go'' as Liverpool is. That is, not at all.
As for Paris and London, one of the city's mayors, Mayor Hidalgo of Paris, has gained huge support for her campaign to sue Fox News over clearly false information regarding the city. As Fox Anchor Julie Banderas said, ''No formal designation of these [no go] zones exists in either country, and neither is there any credible information to support the assertion that there are specific areas in these countries that exclude individuals based solely on their religion''.
Steven Emerson, self proclaimed expert on terrorism, told FOx a religious police beat up anyone non-Muslim who doesn't dress in Muslim clothes in London. I've been to London several times this year, and never seen nor heard of this. Not on one news channel, nor has one shred of credible evidence been presented me (or anyone else for that matter) to verify this. Go to London, and you'll see for yourself that it's nonsense. The mockings on twitter, the rebuttal by Prime Minister David Cameron and the harsh jeers from a plethora of Londoners online ought to let you realize it's utter drivel.
The only reason this ''no-go'' nonsense holds any water across the pond is because you, and a lot of conservatives who've never been to London or Paris, want it to be true.