Who will Win

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,030
8,375
113
Well well well I am going to have to debunk those two red X's.
Your credibility is crashing on the rocks of willful ignorance. How in the world are you two going to redeem yourselves now???

American Mathematical Society: The most irrational number
www.ams.org/publicoutreach/feature-column/fcarc-irrational4
Posthuman isn't going out-gun the American Mathematical Society that's for sure. And a ton of other preeminent top notch mathematicians who have stated the same thing.

Maybe Texas lost their argument at SCOTUS...... but I won mine here.

Here you go posthuman this will help. Maybe you will learn a thing or two while you're at it....

 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,844
13,558
113
Wait, wait, wait...the great state of Texas is deliberately, or in fact
premeditated, filling a lawsuit to undermine the constitutional rights of another American state? What happened to states rights, don’t thread on me and don’t mess with Texas?
it's OK because it has to do with keeping Trump in power indefinitely.
this overrules any other ethic.

((so i've gleaned))
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,030
8,375
113
The Texas suit is done, no further recourse

There are several other cases heading to the Supreme Court,one is on the docket LinWood has a case, Sydney Powell Has Cases, many others not named have cases
Evidently the Texas lawsuit was hasty and quickly compiled. It was dismissed because of a lack of standing not because of a lack of merit. Supposedly new cases are being corrected and reformulated now for submission.

Scotus nevertheless should have ran with it and ended this now. Took a stand and made the constitution iron-clad. There were plenty of good legal reasons to accept the standing of the Texas case. What's a mystery to me is why they took so long to make this declaration.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,327
6,696
113
right after election night, i gave a 35% chance of the election getting overturned. and that was being optimistic.

well, it just dropped to a 15% chance. and that is being VERY optimistic.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,844
13,558
113
Posthuman isn't going out-gun the American Mathematical Society that's for sure. And a ton of other preeminent top notch mathematicians who have stated the same thing.

Maybe Texas lost their argument at SCOTUS...... but I won mine here.

Here you go posthuman this will help. Maybe you will learn a thing or two while you're at it....

you're only looking at one of infinitely many infinite series representations trying desperately to make an ignorant & unwarranted insult stick.


try using your brain instead of searching youtube.

the slow convergence rate of the common infinite series representation you found for φ is due to ρ being ≈ 1
you might try looking into the taylor expansion of cos(π/5)


it's like i said, you look dumber every time you bring it up.
but if you post a random youtube vid i guess it makes you look 'hip' eh
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,030
8,375
113
Supreme Court declines to hear Trump-supported Texas case over election results in four other states

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/scotus-denied-election-texas-election-suit

COWARDS!!! I am absolutely furious!!! :mad: This is the absolute worst scandal that I have seen in my lifetime!
Yes there is a lot of cowardice coming from these judges. If I were a judge in any of these cases I would have taken a stand and said this far and no further. Even if it cost me my life.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
Posthuman isn't going out-gun the American Mathematical Society that's for sure. And a ton of other preeminent top notch mathematicians who have stated the same thing.

Maybe Texas lost their argument at SCOTUS...... but I won mine here.

Here you go posthuman this will help. Maybe you will learn a thing or two while you're at it....

Instead of relying on the knowledge of others do like @posthuman and make your own case.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
you're only looking at one of infinitely many infinite series representations trying desperately to make an ignorant & unwarranted insult stick.


try using your brain instead of searching youtube.

the slow convergence rate of the common infinite series representation you found for φ is due to ρ being ≈ 1
you might try looking into the taylor expansion of cos(π/5)


it's like i said, you look dumber every time you bring it up.
but if you post a random youtube vid i guess it makes you look 'hip' eh
Ha, I just posted the same advice... too funny!!
 
J

Johnjo

Guest
Yes there is a lot of cowardice coming from these judges. If I were a judge in any of these cases I would have taken a stand and said this far and no further. Even if it cost me my life.
You should read “Making Your Case. The Art of Persuading Judges”, by the late Antonin Scalia.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,844
13,558
113
If I were a judge in any of these cases I would have taken a stand and said this far and no further.
that is exactly what they did. they are not going to let a man seditiously litigate his way into stealing an election from the voting public. and the truth is that many Trump-disciples have been threatening to kill them for it.
 
J

Johnjo

Guest
that is exactly what they did. they are not going to let a man seditiously litigate his way into stealing an election from the voting public. and the truth is that many Trump-disciples have been threatening to kill them for it.
True, and there is no mitigating circumstances for people threatening justices upholding the Constitution.
 
J

Johnjo

Guest
This big old question lingers...why would a sitting President do everything in his power to ruin what he in fact did accomplish during his tenure?
 

Truth7t7

Well-known member
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,495
113
Evidently the Texas lawsuit was hasty and quickly compiled. It was dismissed because of a lack of standing not because of a lack of merit. Supposedly new cases are being corrected and reformulated now for submission.

Scotus nevertheless should have ran with it and ended this now. Took a stand and made the constitution iron-clad. There were plenty of good legal reasons to accept the standing of the Texas case. What's a mystery to me is why they took so long to make this declaration.
I read a few conservative legal scholars on the issue?

It's dangerous for setting future precedence, if this was allowed, every futyre Senate, House, Presedential election, in the entire country would be subjected to this ruling

I believe the parties with a direct interest, a candidate, president, President Trump?

It's my opinion, and those that I read up on, SCOTUS didnt want to set future precedence?

The election challenge isnt dead by no means, this was a quick route to SCOTUS
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
This big old question lingers...why would a sitting President do everything in his power to ruin what he in fact did accomplish during his tenure?
Narcissist lens >>>> how he perceives the world, those around him and thinking that he is invincible.
 
J

Johnjo

Guest
Evidently the Texas lawsuit was hasty and quickly compiled. It was dismissed because of a lack of standing not because of a lack of merit. Supposedly new cases are being corrected and reformulated now for submission.

Scotus nevertheless should have ran with it and ended this now. Took a stand and made the constitution iron-clad. There were plenty of good legal reasons to accept the standing of the Texas case. What's a mystery to me is why they took so long to make this declaration.
I think the legal phrase you’re looking for is “circumstantial and coincidental”.

Pretty much like the outgoing President.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.