WikiLeaks: DNC email leak reveals anti-Sanders bias, pro-Clinton collusion

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#21
#21
Utah said:
Such kind, loving words from the one who cries about being attacked. I notice you once again attacked the person rather than attempt to refute their correct analysis. Let the record speak!
Click to expand...
when your lackey proves to be capable of an independent thought rather than just repeating or 'liking' all of your evil personal attacks towards me...then i'll bother giving her an actual response...

and the troll who made the first -entirely unprovoked- personal attack on this thread is in absolutely no position to criticize...

let the record show that you are the ultimate hypocrite...
 
Utah

Utah

Banned
#22
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
251
0
#22
RachelBibleStudent said:
when your lackey proves to be capable of an independent thought rather than just repeating or 'liking' all of your evil personal attacks towards me...then i'll bother giving her an actual response...

and the troll who made the first -entirely unprovoked- personal attack on this thread is in absolutely no position to criticize...

let the record show that you are the ultimate hypocrite...
Click to expand...
More words of kindness. You're digging deeper and deeper . . .

and you're being reported.
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#23
#23
here is an example of a civil reply to what i had initially posted...
http://christianchat.com/christian-...s-bias-pro-clinton-collusion.html#post2715790

note also...desdichado -could- have expressed an opposite opinion by saying something like 'i disagree...i think what you are insinuating is quite a reach'...and it would have still be a civil reply...i understand that he is quite capable of disagreeing in a civil manner...

and here is utah's response...
http://christianchat.com/christian-...s-bias-pro-clinton-collusion.html#post2716302

"You're sick."

any questions?
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#24
#24
Utah said:
More words of kindness. You're digging deeper and deeper . . .

and you're being reported.
Click to expand...
and you've already been reported for the unprovoked personal attack that started this argument...

and whoever wins that battle...know that i will not be bullied any more...
 
Last edited:
Utah

Utah

Banned
#25
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
251
0
#25
By our words we will be vindicated and condemned.

I know my fate. Matthew 12:36-37
 
Utah

Utah

Banned
#26
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
251
0
#26
LiJo said:
You attacked Trump on a DNC thread and claimed you're being attack when Utah brings it to light. So where is the attack?!
Click to expand...
Hey lackey, make me lunch. ;)
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#27
#27
it is plain for anyone to see that my initial post stood for fourteen hours without anyone blowing a fuse and dragging the thread down into the mud...

then a certain someone shows up and goes ballistic with a personal insult...this person is clearly the source of the problem...
 
Utah

Utah

Banned
#28
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
251
0
#28
RachelBibleStudent said:
it is plain for anyone to see that my initial post stood for fourteen hours without anyone blowing a fuse and dragging the thread down into the mud...

then a certain someone shows up and goes ballistic...this person is clearly the source of the problem...
Click to expand...
Backpeddling? Own up to your error in judgment and all will be forgiven.
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#30
#30
Utah said:
Backpeddling? Own up to your error in judgment and all will be forgiven.
Click to expand...
everything was fine here until you showed up and called someone 'sick'...why don't you own up to your responsibility for lowering the discussion?
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#31
#31
Desdichado said:
Yeah, it's rather interesting how we're not seeing RNC emails released. They've been playing favorites with candidates for years.
Click to expand...
a suspicion i have been wondering about for some time is...do we even know if all of the documents released by wikileaks are authentic?

does the media vet them in any way before reporting on them as 'stunning new wikileaks revelations!'

i say this because wikileaks seems to be at least partially a russian 'psychological operations' affair...forged documents are common in espionage...
 
Desdichado

Desdichado

Senior Member
#32
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#32
Sirk said:
I think you wanted to marry into the trump family but didn't make the cut. Lol
Click to expand...
I'm still waiting for Tiffany to say yes. She'll come around, I'm certain...
 
J

jennymae

Guest
#33
#33
RachelBibleStudent said:
a suspicion i have been wondering about for some time is...do we even know if all of the documents released by wikileaks are authentic?

does the media vet them in any way before reporting on them as 'stunning new wikileaks revelations!'

i say this because wikileaks seems to be at least partially a russian 'psychological operations' affair...forged documents are common in espionage...
Click to expand...
We don't know anything for sure. Information needs to be verified by more than one source. Problem is that we more often than not just grab the first piece of information that fits our own personal meaning.
 
Desdichado

Desdichado

Senior Member
#38
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#38
I'm in rare form today. It must be my desire to get this forum to simmer down.
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#39
#39
interestingly while wikileaks releases frequently show political motivation in terms of both target and timing...there is one potential target that wikileaks does not appear willing to provoke...

julian assange in 2010..."The Kremlin had better brace itself for a coming wave of WikiLeaks disclosures about Russia."
assange 'clarifying' later in 2010..."We have material on many businesses and governments, including in Russia. It's not right to say there's going to be a particular focus on Russia."

as of 2016 no major 'russia' material appears to have been released...

this all reinforces the likelihood that wikileaks is a front for russian psychological operations...
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#40
#40
evidently the clinton campaign is now blaming russia and saying this was calculated to benefit trump...

the dots were pretty obvious...even she couldn't miss connecting them...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.