Will Justice Neil Gorsuch Make a Difference?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#1
United States President Donald J. Trump nominated Judge Neil M. Gorsuch to fill an 11
-month-old vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday night. Like the late Supreme
Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Judge Gorsuch is known as a textualist and originalist,
someone who will interpret the U.S. Constitution as the Founding Fathers intended.

During his speech introducing Judge Gorsuch, President Trump said:

When Justice Scalia passed away suddenly last February, I made a promise to the
American people: If I were elected president, I would find the very best judge in the
country for the Supreme Court. I promised to select someone who respects our laws
and is representative of our Constitution and who loves our Constitution and someone
who will interpret them as written.

Shortly after Justice Scalia’s death last February, Judge Gorsuch praised Scalia’s
legacy in a speech highlighting Scalia’s understanding of the distinction between
judge and legislator:

But tonight I want to touch on a more thematic point and suggest that perhaps the great
project of Justice Scalia’s career was to remind us of the differences between judges
and legislators. To remind us that legislators may appeal to their own moral convictions
and to claims about social utility to reshape the law as they think it should be in the future.

But that judges should do none of these things in a democratic society. That judges should
instead strive (if humanly and so imperfectly) to apply the law as it is, focusing backward,
not forward, and looking to text, structure and history to decide what a reasonable reader
at the time of the events in question would have understood the law to be—not to decide
cases based on their own moral convictions or the policy consequences they believe might
serve society best....


To President Trump’s credit, Judge Gorsuch is probably the best person he could
have picked to fill the vacant seat on the Supreme Court.

https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/14536.2.0.0/world/war/will-justice-neil-gorsuch-make-a-difference
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,397
113
#2
If he is a strict constitutionalist, and not someone who feels the need to creatively interpret the very easy to understand Bill of Rights, then, YES, he can make a great difference.

Any justice that feels it is their duty to leave some lasting legacy by stepping all over our rights should be immediately disbarred.

Decisions made like "I know it says 'the right of the PEOPLE', but what they REALLY meant was....." should be grounds for removal from the court.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,062
1,498
113
#3
He has one strike against him. He's a Harvard lawyer. The court is now 6 to 3 Harvard/Yale. Can't we poor non Ivy League Lawyers have at least one seat?
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,397
113
#4
I think we need more Texas lawyers on that court.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,233
6,560
113
#5
If you are referring to the balance of power on the Court, no, not really. It will simply remain as it was before the death of Scalia. The "wild card" on the Court is Kennedy. Never know how he will vote.......

What will make a huge difference is if one of the Liberal Justices decides to retire in the next 4 years.

I am not convinced they will..........but it is possible. I think they will try to hold out until after the 2020 Elections hoping a Dem wins the White House.......but if Trump wins a second term, then the Court could end up with a Conservative majority, and that would have a dramatic and long lasting effect upon our Nation.

The balance of power then would be 5 Conservatives, 3 Liberals, and Kennedy..........meaning Kennedy would lose his power to control how the Court rules on just about every case they hear.
 
S

Susanna

Guest
#6
He has one strike against him. He's a Harvard lawyer. The court is now 6 to 3 Harvard/Yale. Can't we poor non Ivy League Lawyers have at least one seat?
There's no protestants either on that court. I guess SEC Lawyers are too unpredictable for the east coasters.
 

Zmouth

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2012
3,391
134
63
#7
There's no protestants either on that court. I guess SEC Lawyers are too unpredictable for the east coasters.
Nah, it is more that King of Great has, does and will always make Judges dependent on his Will alone, which is the reason that only Roman Catholics (Or Tenth Generation Roman Catholics which I will let you guess what they are called) will hold position of supreme Court Justice, or at least until the UN World Court finally obtains supremacy over the member State Courts.