Any Calvinist Women out there?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
... he is somehow special and above ....
Luke 14:10-11 But when thou art bidden, go and sit down in the lowest room; that when he that bade thee cometh, he may say unto thee, Friend, go up higher: then shalt thou have worship in the presence of them that sit at meat with thee. For whosoever exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.

I believe in predestination and making caricatures of what that means is not gonna convince anyone to believe differently. :rolleyes:
I believe in the teachings of Jesus Christ and making caricatures of that, well, ...
 

lil_christian

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2010
7,489
73
48
27
Okay, guys. We might not agree on HOW we're saved. But we can agree that we ARE saved. That Jesus was born, He died and rose again, and now we are free from bondage. That we did not deserve this love God has given to us.

God didn't even have to create us. But you know what? He did.

He even sent His Son to fix the mess that WE created for ourselves.

I don't believe in Calvinism. Or Arminianism. I believe in the Bible. I believe in Jesus Christ. And THAT is what matters. It's not about how we got to where we are now. That doesn't matter. What does matter is where our hearts are at, and getting closer to God, each and every day.


Can we now call it a day? I feel like if we don't we'll become the people we complain about.
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
Can we now call it a day? I feel like if we don't we'll become the people we complain about.
You already want to quit? Fighting is one of our finest European traditions--it's like eating Camembert cheese with champagne...


-> European wars of religion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The European wars of religion were a series of religious wars waged in Europe from ca. 1524 to 1648, following the onset of the Protestant Reformation in Western and Northern Europe. Although sometimes unconnected, all of these wars were strongly influenced by the religious change of the period, and the conflict and rivalry that it produced."

burn.jpg
 
U

Ugly

Guest
Okay, guys. We might not agree on HOW we're saved. But we can agree that we ARE saved
If you think that question through, you can see the fallacy in the question. Person A) think salvation only happens in X manner, while person B) thinks salvation happens only in Y manner. So can't we agree that we all have salvation? They both disagree on How to be saved, so how can they agree that they are both saved? According to their own doctrines the other is not saved. And neither is anyone who disagrees.
So, to answer your question, for them, No.. we cannot agree that we are saved.
 

lil_christian

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2010
7,489
73
48
27
You already want to quit? Fighting is one of our finest European traditions--it's like eating Camembert cheese with champagne...


-> European wars of religion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The European wars of religion were a series of religious wars waged in Europe from ca. 1524 to 1648, following the onset of the Protestant Reformation in Western and Northern Europe. Although sometimes unconnected, all of these wars were strongly influenced by the religious change of the period, and the conflict and rivalry that it produced."

View attachment 67062
Well, that just gives me warm fuzzies inside....



...no wait. That was worded really badly.
 

lil_christian

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2010
7,489
73
48
27
If you think that question through, you can see the fallacy in the question. Person A) think salvation only happens in X manner, while person B) thinks salvation happens only in Y manner. So can't we agree that we all have salvation? They both disagree on How to be saved, so how can they agree that they are both saved? According to their own doctrines the other is not saved. And neither is anyone who disagrees.
So, to answer your question, for them, No.. we cannot agree that we are saved.
I Christ, I am confident I'm saved. I believe that jimmydiggs is saved. I believe that Grace-Like-Rain is saved. Just to name a few. Do I agree with them on how we all got saved? No. But I'm not going to accuse someone of not being a Christian. It's not up to me. And it's not between me and them. It's between them and Christ.
 
U

Ugly

Guest
I Christ, I am confident I'm saved. I believe that jimmydiggs is saved. I believe that Grace-Like-Rain is saved. Just to name a few. Do I agree with them on how we all got saved? No. But I'm not going to accuse someone of not being a Christian. It's not up to me. And it's not between me and them. It's between them and Christ.
My point was if you have two people thinking salvation comes in two differing ways, someone is going to accuse the other of not being saved. Just go in the bible forum to see.
 
J

Jullianna

Guest
I don't accept "ists" or "isms" anymore than I believe in denominations. If I bear a label, let it be only as a child of the Most High God through faith in the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. Not of my own doing, but solely because of His self-sacrificing love.
 

lil_christian

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2010
7,489
73
48
27
My point was if you have two people thinking salvation comes in two differing ways, someone is going to accuse the other of not being saved. Just go in the bible forum to see.
That's what I'm worried about...we're leaning towards that direction.
 
U

Ugly

Guest
That's what I'm worried about...we're leaning towards that direction.
I'm certain we're there. Just that the Singles area has been able to keep these kinds of conversations at bay. But now that the door has been opened, its only a matter of time for whats in a person heads to be brought out through their fingers.
 
J

Jullianna

Guest
That's what I'm worried about...we're leaning towards that direction.
More and more every day, lil. It's heartbreaking.

We are supposed to be the family of God. We are supposed to be known by our love for one another, not by our bickering. Seeing all of this stuff is highly discouraging to fellow believers and gives an appearance of hypocrisy to unbelievers.

Speak the Truth. Speak the truth in LOVE. But please leave the man made stuff at the door.
 
J

Jullianna

Guest
I'm certain we're there. Just that the Singles area has been able to keep these kinds of conversations at bay. But now that the door has been opened, its only a matter of time for whats in a person heads to be brought out through their fingers.
Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks...

satan must be rejoicing at much of what has been typed in this forum of late.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sep 6, 2013
4,430
117
63
I didn't see anyone saying someone wasn't saved. (Unless it was Praus, and his posts don't really count. We simply cannot add them to the conversation since - I hope - most of them are made in jest.) :p

Just wanted to say that I'm proud of us for having a doctrinal conversation among loved ones. I have found that often when a controversial thread pops up, someone well-meaning posts about how it's all going to go bad, and as a result they create a self-fulfilling prophecy. It's like... they know it COULD go bad, so they go ahead and get the ball rolling without realizing it. It often adds just enough tension to the situation (where there may not have been very much before) to tip the scale.

Just something I've been thinking about on controversial threads. I've seen several lately where that happened. It got ugly directly after someone came in and made statements about how the thread was a bad idea and things were going to get nasty.
 

Descyple

Senior Member
Jun 7, 2010
3,023
48
48
I'm going to suggest something that will end this debate on CC once and or all.

We're going to have a triathlon of events in which two teams of three people made up of CC members from this particular thread will compete, and the winners of this triathlon will have their theological position accepted as the official position of CC. And debates will not be allowed henceforth (yeah, I said henceforth, you got a problem with my stuck-in-the-17th-century vocabulary???).

In honor of debates between Christians in church history (and considering the subject at hand) we will carry out this triathlon in the city of Dordrecht, Netherlands (site of the historic Synod of Dordt debates in the early 17th century).

The three events will be as follows:

1. A "Book of Romans" Speed-Reading Contest (anyone who skips over verses in Romans 9 will be immediately disqualified).

2. A "Book Burning" Contest (we won't actually burn books, but we will see who can come up with the best "burns" (insults) regarding the two writings of the Arminians "Five Articles of the Remonstrants" and John Calvin's "Institutes of the Christian Religion"

3. Potato Sack Races (just because they are soooooooo much fun!!!).


The two teams will be represented by the following CC members:

1. The Calvinist Position (or what I like to call the "Bible-Based" Position):

Grace-Like-Rain, Kayem77, and Myself (NodMyHeadLikeYeah will sub in in case there's an injury or if I need to fix my hair).


2. The Non-Calvinist Position (which includes Arminians and the "Neither Or" Group - which I like to call "Arminians-In-Disguise"):

Lil_Christian, TinTin, and Jullianna (Maxwel will sub in in case there's an injury or if Jullianna is too busy punching us Calvinists in the face!!!).


Good luck to all of you at the Theology Triathlon, and remember kids - LET'S HAVE FUN!!!


P.S. I wrote this in the spirit of humor, so please do not send me any hate mail, unless they all end with Tiny Tim's universal benediction "God bless us, every one"
 

Yahshua

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2013
2,915
817
113
Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks...

satan must be rejoicing at much of what has been typed in this forum of late.

Isaiah 9:2
"The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined."

You know who'll have the last laugh though.

----

Speaking of predestined outcomes; I don't mean to revive this thread but this is how I understand it...maybe it'll help someone:


1. There are two seeds on the earth...only two.

2. God has *predestined* his seed - The Elect - for salvation, and the seed of that old serpent - the children of perdition - he's predestined for destruction. The Elect will not be destroyed, nor will the serpent's seed see salvation.

And Christ was slain from the foundation of the world to secure this destiny. The Elect WILL be saved and the Damned WILL be destroyed...this is a foregone conclusion; two trains on two different tracks leading to two specific outcomes. And these trains can't be derailed.

3. However, each person has a choice on which train to ride. That's all one's free will amounts to: the choice between trains "life" or "death"; between the elect's pre(determined)destination or the pre(determined)destination of the damned.

Deuteronomy 30:19
This day I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live

And the choice is simply (but profoundly) belief in his son, "for God so loves the world..."


4. Now, from God's perspective (being greater than time itself since he "was, is and will be") he's already seen - from time immemorial - who (by their own free will) will choose to believe in his son and who won't...and when. Yet we can't know this because we only exist in the present, one moment at a time. For example, he knew Paul would choose his son, but he also knew it would be after his time as a murderer. He knew Judas would choose against his son, but he also knew it would be after he was selected as an apostles who witnessed all of Christ's miracles.

These men freely made their choice when the time came...but God still foreknew the free choice each would make all on their own, simply because he's outside of time; so big that he exists at all points across time at once. He can see it all at once; time is that small to him.

[Imagine time was a simple ruler...

17cm_wooden_ruler.jpg

If you had a ruler in front of you, notice how you can see the entire length of this ruler at once. No portion of it escapes your gaze. It's the same with God and time.]

Romans 8:29
For whom he did foreknow [because he's outside of time], he also did predestinate [i.e. predetermined the last destination on the "train"] to be conformed to the image of his Son [i.e. the last stop], that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

God doesn't force anyone, as he's the still small voice (1 Kings 19:12). But from God's unique perspective, each person who will ever live has already made their free will choice about his Son, once the time came that they learned the truth. So he's ordered the steps for each path (Psalm 119:133) to reach his final destinations...we've each just gotta walk it out in our own time.

Again, *we* can't know which choice we've ultimately picked in time because we only ever exist in this moment, so there isn't a guarantee for anyone to freely sin, saying "oh, well I'm the elect" or "oh well...I'm the damned". Because of this, I'm thankful and I constantly pray that I never lose the faith I now have.
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
The two teams will be represented by the following CC members:

1. The Calvinist Position (or what I like to call the "Bible-Based" Position):

Grace-Like-Rain, Kayem77, and Myself (NodMyHeadLikeYeah will sub in in case there's an injury or if I need to fix my hair).

2. The Non-Calvinist Position (which includes Arminians and the "Neither Or" Group - which I like to call "Arminians-In-Disguise"):

Lil_Christian, TinTin, and Jullianna (Maxwel will sub in in case there's an injury or if Jullianna is too busy punching us Calvinists in the face!!!).
Daysman: ????

Job 9:33 Neither is there any daysman betwixt us, [that] might lay his hand upon us both.
 
S

Shouryu

Guest
[Imagine time was a simple ruler...

View attachment 67073

If you had a ruler in front of you, notice how you can see the entire length of this ruler at once. No portion of it escapes your gaze. It's the same with God and time.]
Ooooh, I like that way to explain it! I've always believe the same, but explained it differently - I borrow the analogy used on the TV show Fringe, where they pour liquid through a tube..."This is how we experience time...unidirectional, always flowing." Then they hold up a tube filled with the liquid from end to end. "This is how they experience it...not as a flow, but a single solid pool that is completely connected from end to end. So, they see everything at once."

The ruler thing is way simpler.
 

Descyple

Senior Member
Jun 7, 2010
3,023
48
48
POTATO SACK RACE!!

We need team uniforms.
Grace, our team uniforms will be the colors of Red and White with a maple leaf on the front in honor of my country's Canadian flag (since the Triathlon is my idea, I get to pick the logo. Sorry!!!).

And our team motto will be on the back, which will be "Et Reformari Ad Petram" (latin for "Reformed And Ready To Rock).

I will let you come up with our official team name!!!