Do you realize that in 1950 the divorce rate was 2.6 per 1000 population and the current is 4.0 per 1000 population and yes that is an increase but not as significant as people suggest. And as far as the reason for the large amount of older single people on big reason is because people have become disillusioned about marriage due to their experiences, world media, others opinions. And the world is degenerating all the time. Which is better a time when women married men that were horrendous to them, had mistresses, etc or a time where women have finally decided that they should hold out for so much better? Just because men because men have always done something (putting other things over God), doesn't mean its the way it should be. We as men need to stop whining about women's new desire for better husbands and just become better husbands.
I just did a quick google search for a few responses to this, and I can't find anything that comes even close to what you are saying. What I did find are some interesting things:
The Center has released total state and regional marriage and divorce numbers (not the same thing as rates) for the years 2000, 1999 and 1998.
The total numbers of U.S. divorces (excluding the non-counting states) reported finalized annually are 957,200 in 2000, 944,317 in 1999, and 947,384 in 1998.
The total numbers of U.S. marriages (including those states) reported celebrated annually are 2,355,005 in 2000, 2,366,623 in 1999, and 2,267,854 in 1998. - The National Center for Health Statistics
I hope you look at the numbers. Half of all weddings in this time frame turn into divorces.
HALF. Tell me that isn't a significant number? Your original statistics don't count the fact that the much older couples grew up in a time when marriage meant something and people still understood gender roles. Times have changed. The new generation of women are different.
Also, the average age of a marriage was at the age of 20 back in 1960. The average age now is 26. The women of today's generation also have had so many sexual partners by the time they get married that they are jaded, emotional messes. This is also not counting the huge amount of single moms out there. This is strictly the man's fault in lots of cases, but there are specific reasons WHY.
In the 1960s, women didn't just say "I need my jerk alpha male." They went for the best provider. The hardworking, dependable beta male got married. Nowadays, women go for the jerk alpha male, because they don't want a provider, they want the best "catch" on the market they can get. When the alpha male runs through her, he drops her right afterword because he refuses to settle down and lower his standards for that girl. It becomes a revolving door til she wakes up at an older age and says "I need a nice guy now who will take care of me." The problem is, the nice guy now has the power, and he is probably embittered by being rejected so much earlier in life. What he gets is to fix her emotional train wreck, possibly take care of another man's kids, and try to measure up to a dilluded image of a "real" man that the girl now possesses due to her emotionally scarred past encounters with the alpha males. What a deal?
Women want their cake and eat it too. Things don't work out that way though. That's my original point with this whole thing. Kiwi is young, so I can't expect her to realize all of the undertones with today's society, but they aren't good. Women being equal in society is perfectly fine. I'm not against feminism as it originally was meant to be. I am against the sexual revolution type feminism that made women better and men inferior and the huge implications that now follow because of it.
So why do I feel this way when I have no trouble meeting women like some might? It's because I see society today for what it is. It's a huge mess. I get hit on all the time by women who have been divorced, have multiple kids, and they think that it's ok. You women don't realize that I DON'T want to marry a girl who got divorced for stupid reasons and then obviously didn't respect her own marriage as a covenant with God. Some women truly did have bad experiences and divorce was the best option, but a lot of cases turned out to be the woman's choosing not his. It makes me fearful to even want to marry a girl based on how many horror stories you hear.
Want to know another good statistic Merridoc? You should have done better research
"
No-fault divorce caused already-climbing divorce rates to jump further. As the preceding statistics reveal, divorce rates in America zoomed to new heights under no-fault. Though not all of the increase can be attributed exclusively to the changes in the law, a significant portion can. In a 1989 study by Justec Research in Virginia on the effects of no-fault divorce in 38 states, the findings revealed "very strong evidence" that no-fault increased divorce in eight states and "some lesser evidence" for increases in eight more. The study's author, lawyer and sociologist Thomas B. Marvell, concludes that "on the average, the no-fault laws increased divorces by some 20 to 25 percent." In none of the states studied did no-fault decrease divorce."
Brian Willats, Breaking Up is Easy To Do, available from Michigan Family Forum, citing Thomas B. Marvell, "Divorce Rates and the Fault Requirement," Law and Society Review 23 (1989), p. 544. Cited in Bryce J. Christensen, "Taking Stock: Assessing Twenty Years of 'No Fault' Divorce", The Family In America, September 1991 , p. 4.
No fault divorce means you can divorce for anything and everything. If you'd like, I'll find evidence to prove that women are the initiators of divorces and breakups 2/3rds of the time. Oh liberalism/feminism has helped society in so many ways, right?