What makes sin pleasurable?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 2, 2009
24,643
4,304
113
#21
My church was organizing an event for none believers and when we asked that question all of a sudden you see silence in the room!! :D

Eventually people started to share and we got all sorts of good answers at the end.

My question is about ANY sin. I'm not talking about sexual sin. Please don't focus on that.

I'd like to know your thoughts on this.

I'll start with my own thoughts first thinking, maybe because what's forbidden is usually desirable OR maybe sin fulfills the needs and desires of our broken nature. Our needs and desires are suppose to be fulfilled by God, but when we lack patience or when we are quick to anger or when our curiosity kills us, we sin.

Your thoughts?
Because....... if it didn't feel good, no one would do it! :p
 
Last edited:
S

st_sebastian

Guest
#22
For me, it's because existence was meant to be enjoyable. This world is shadowed, but it is a shadow of something God called good. Even when we misuse it and although it is no longer perfect, it still reflects the intent.

Sin feels good because God did not completely withdraw his original intention from the world. Just like gravity kept on working and the sun kept shining when sin entered the world, pleasure kept on working roughly as it had before.

The problem is when we chase these approximations, these lesser goods.
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,345
2,157
113
#23
I read a good quote on facebook the other day:

'A sinning Christian is a miserable Christian'

Sounds about right continual unrepentant sin robs you of real joy (as someone earlier has already said).
 

rachelsedge

Senior Member
Oct 15, 2012
3,659
81
48
34
#24
Matt Chandler put it a great way: We listen to the promises of sin over the promises of God. The difference being that the promise of sin never comes to pass, while God is able to keep His promises. Yet, we choose the short-lived pleasure of sin and its "promises" over God's truth so many times.
 
B

biscuit

Guest
#25
My church was organizing an event for none believers and when we asked that question all of a sudden you see silence in the room!! :D

Eventually people started to share and we got all sorts of good answers at the end.

My question is about ANY sin. I'm not talking about sexual sin. Please don't focus on that.

I'd like to know your thoughts on this.

I'll start with my own thoughts first thinking, maybe because what's forbidden is usually desirable OR maybe sin fulfills the needs and desires of our broken nature. Our needs and desires are suppose to be fulfilled by God, but when we lack patience or when we are quick to anger or when our curiosity kills us, we sin.

Your thoughts?
It is part of being accepted into the general community. If one refrains or tries to avoid the sinful lifestyle, they are going to be rejected as weird.
 
A

abbiejean

Guest
#26
It is part of being accepted into the general community. If one refrains or tries to avoid the sinful lifestyle, they are going to be rejected as weird.
Bingo. Totally.
 
I

IloveyouGod

Guest
#28
Exactly!! And that's what's called Stupidity and weakness. Keep doing the wrong thing over and over again!!! Dah!!!! :confused: :eek:


Matt Chandler put it a great way: We listen to the promises of sin over the promises of God. The difference being that the promise of sin never comes to pass, while God is able to keep His promises. Yet, we choose the short-lived pleasure of sin and its "promises" over God's truth so many times.
 
I

IloveyouGod

Guest
#29
Hmmm...so we are weak followers who don't have the strength, confidence n' guts to lead with love and acceptance.

A true Christian is the one who accepts others the way they are with love while making them respect him and wanting to get to know who that person? What does he believe in that makes him so happy and loving to everyone!... :)


It is part of being accepted into the general community. If one refrains or tries to avoid the sinful lifestyle, they are going to be rejected as weird.
 
M

MidniteWelder

Guest
#30
Matt Chandler put it a great way: We listen to the promises of sin over the promises of God. The difference being that the promise of sin never comes to pass, while God is able to keep His promises. Yet, we choose the short-lived pleasure of sin and its "promises" over God's truth so many times.
God delivers; What sin promised and falls short of. Good thoughts Rachel
 
M

MidniteWelder

Guest
#31
How weak and dumb are we to enjoy a "Fake" "Limited" pleasure that will feel SO BAD later on!! :(

Haha very truthful and humble perspective,
It's wise to realize our own weaknesses and limitations and rely on God where we fall short, rather than trying to compensate if God hasn't given one the ability to deliver.
And if God enables us, follow through relentlessly.
 
I

IloveyouGod

Guest
#32
Matthew 23: 11 says But he who is greatest among you shall be your servant. 12 And whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted. :)



Haha very truthful and humble perspective,
It's wise to realize our own weaknesses and limitations and rely on God where we fall short, rather than trying to compensate if God hasn't given one the ability to deliver.
And if God enables us, follow through relentlessly.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#34
Now this is a good problem for the challenge idea method. Good stuff. The church needs to get out of their box and ask these types of questions which lead to other important questions and so on and so forth being careful to qualify conclusions properly.

We could start by recognizing that the Bible (and observation) states some pleasure is immoral. The paradox of bad pleasures is highlighted in the roll call of faith of Hebrews 11, where we read that Moses chose “rather to share ill-treatment with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin” (Heb 11:25 RSV).

“The pleasures of sin” must mean the immediate gratification that some morally bad actions can bring. We can further surmise that pleasures can be “false” when they are morally wrong or when they are overvalued (perhaps to the point of idolatry).

Although in one sense the Bible endorses the person as pleasure-seeker, Paul in 2 Timothy 3:4 delineates what can go wrong with this innate human impulse to seek pleasure when he speaks of people who are “lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God” (RSV). Peter extends the picture when he writes of people who “count it pleasure to revel in the daytime. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their dissipation” (2 Pet 2:13 RSV). Here is a double image of false pleasures—activities that gratify the body temporarily but that are pursued excessively to the neglect of the greater good, God, and that are immoral, displeasing to God.

The most obvious category of pleasurable sins depicted in the Bible is illicit sexual activity. A memorable narrative example is David’s adultery with Bathsheba (2 Sam 11). But the book of Proverbs gives the most detailed account of the false pleasures of illicit sex. The seductress Folly assures her victims that “stolen water is sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant” (Prov 9:17 RSV).

The extended temptation story in Proverbs 7:6–27 is replete with evocative imagery of sexual and sensory pleasure-kisses, a couch decked with coverings, a luxurious linen bedspread, perfume, privacy and the invitation “Come, let us take our fill of love till morning; let us delight ourselves with love” (Prov 7:18 RSV). Equally vivid is the imagery of the “smooth tongue of the adventuress” (Prov 6:24 RSV) and her sexual attractiveness, identified as a “beauty” that a man would desire in his heart and imaged by the woman’s captivating eyelashes (Prov 6:25).

Additional portraits of the perversion of pleasure fill out the description of false pleasures. The proverb “He who loves pleasure will be a poor man” (Prov 21:17 RSV) refers to the person who neglects the duties of work in order to do what is more immediately pleasurable. People can actually come to enjoy immoral acts, so that (for example) they “take pleasure in falsehood” (Ps 62:4 RSV). Addiction and lack of self-control are evident in people who are “slaves to various passions and pleasures” (Tit 3:3 RSV).

The most detailed account of the futility and disillusionment that attend an abandonment to pleasure occurs in Ecclesiastes 2:1–11, where the author decides to “make a test of pleasure” by pursuing discreet sensuality, the acquisition of goods, sex and entertainment. But after keeping his “heart from no pleasure,” he comes up empty: “all was vanity and a striving after wind” (RSV). In this famous test the ancient teacher tried to get more out of the pleasures of life than they can give, whereas other passages in Ecclesiastes show pleasure to be something God gives.

And the imagery asserts places of false pleasure. Ecclesiastes 7:2–4 speaks of a “house of feasting” and a “house of mirth” (NIV “house of pleasure”). In Proverbs 9:13–18 Folly has her own “house” from which she utters her seductive invitation to eat bread “in secret.” The point of the spatial metaphor is at least twofold: (1) many actions require a site where they are performed and with which they are associated, and (2) an indulgent lifestyle surrounds a person and becomes the habitual “world” in which he or she resides. True pleasures are also pictured as having their special places: the psalmist finds his pleasure at God’s right hand (Ps 16:11) and in the temple (Ps 84:4).

The science of sin focuses on those carnal pleasures which are sin (don't confuse those with the ones that are not); however, since we exist in a multi-layered complex reality that incorporates both the material and the spiritual it's important to point out that other components (e.g. psychological, spiritual, etc...) exist as well.

My church was organizing an event for none believers and when we asked that question all of a sudden you see silence in the room!! :D
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#36
"Denial ain't just a river in Egypt" - Mark Twain
 
M

MidniteWelder

Guest
#37
Matthew 23: 11 says But he who is greatest among you shall be your servant. 12 And whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted. :)
.......Amen :)
 
I

IloveyouGod

Guest
#38
That's right AgeofKnowledge. My church is a Coptic Orthodox "Missionary" church. So we don't serve Christians only, we also serve none believers. We do lots of events of that sort for them and with LOTS of prayers God works miracles in people's lives! :)

Thanks AgeofKnowledge :)


Now this is a good problem for the challenge idea method. Good stuff. The church needs to get out of their box and ask these types of questions which lead to other important questions and so on and so forth being careful to qualify conclusions properly.

We could start by recognizing that the Bible (and observation) states some pleasure is immoral. The paradox of bad pleasures is highlighted in the roll call of faith of Hebrews 11, where we read that Moses chose “rather to share ill-treatment with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin” (Heb 11:25 RSV).

“The pleasures of sin” must mean the immediate gratification that some morally bad actions can bring. We can further surmise that pleasures can be “false” when they are morally wrong or when they are overvalued (perhaps to the point of idolatry).

Although in one sense the Bible endorses the person as pleasure-seeker, Paul in 2 Timothy 3:4 delineates what can go wrong with this innate human impulse to seek pleasure when he speaks of people who are “lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God” (RSV). Peter extends the picture when he writes of people who “count it pleasure to revel in the daytime. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their dissipation” (2 Pet 2:13 RSV). Here is a double image of false pleasures—activities that gratify the body temporarily but that are pursued excessively to the neglect of the greater good, God, and that are immoral, displeasing to God.

The most obvious category of pleasurable sins depicted in the Bible is illicit sexual activity. A memorable narrative example is David’s adultery with Bathsheba (2 Sam 11). But the book of Proverbs gives the most detailed account of the false pleasures of illicit sex. The seductress Folly assures her victims that “stolen water is sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant” (Prov 9:17 RSV).

The extended temptation story in Proverbs 7:6–27 is replete with evocative imagery of sexual and sensory pleasure-kisses, a couch decked with coverings, a luxurious linen bedspread, perfume, privacy and the invitation “Come, let us take our fill of love till morning; let us delight ourselves with love” (Prov 7:18 RSV). Equally vivid is the imagery of the “smooth tongue of the adventuress” (Prov 6:24 RSV) and her sexual attractiveness, identified as a “beauty” that a man would desire in his heart and imaged by the woman’s captivating eyelashes (Prov 6:25).

Additional portraits of the perversion of pleasure fill out the description of false pleasures. The proverb “He who loves pleasure will be a poor man” (Prov 21:17 RSV) refers to the person who neglects the duties of work in order to do what is more immediately pleasurable. People can actually come to enjoy immoral acts, so that (for example) they “take pleasure in falsehood” (Ps 62:4 RSV). Addiction and lack of self-control are evident in people who are “slaves to various passions and pleasures” (Tit 3:3 RSV).

The most detailed account of the futility and disillusionment that attend an abandonment to pleasure occurs in Ecclesiastes 2:1–11, where the author decides to “make a test of pleasure” by pursuing discreet sensuality, the acquisition of goods, sex and entertainment. But after keeping his “heart from no pleasure,” he comes up empty: “all was vanity and a striving after wind” (RSV). In this famous test the ancient teacher tried to get more out of the pleasures of life than they can give, whereas other passages in Ecclesiastes show pleasure to be something God gives.

And the imagery asserts places of false pleasure. Ecclesiastes 7:2–4 speaks of a “house of feasting” and a “house of mirth” (NIV “house of pleasure”). In Proverbs 9:13–18 Folly has her own “house” from which she utters her seductive invitation to eat bread “in secret.” The point of the spatial metaphor is at least twofold: (1) many actions require a site where they are performed and with which they are associated, and (2) an indulgent lifestyle surrounds a person and becomes the habitual “world” in which he or she resides. True pleasures are also pictured as having their special places: the psalmist finds his pleasure at God’s right hand (Ps 16:11) and in the temple (Ps 84:4).

The science of sin focuses on those carnal pleasures which are sin (don't confuse those with the ones that are not); however, since we exist in a multi-layered complex reality that incorporates both the material and the spiritual it's important to point out that other components (e.g. psychological, spiritual, etc...) exist as well.
 
M

MidniteWelder

Guest
#40
We got to put things in the right perspective. We are all not more than tools in God's hands! :)

That's a good way of looking at it.
We can choose to be a cooperative tool, a willing tool.
Some people at times fight this then assigning a perspective saying something the effect
"what are we robots?!"
But no, if we were robots we would not be given the free will(given by God
;)) to rebel against God when he wishes to use us.
God will use us whether we like it, realize it or not.
We though, have the choice to be used, (yes USED as we are created by him and for him and his purpose not our own if nobody likes it I suggest take it up with God) to be used as the Potter see's fit. As opposed to the idea of thinking we are created for our own purposes.

This is the reason Jesus stated
"I wish you were one way or the Other" as opposed to being lukewarm...so we are consistent in the way Christ may use us.
While some people don't like the idea of being used
Yep, we as a "follower" a "Slave" and possibly even progress on to being a "friend" must be willing to be used, by God, and I don't see that as a bad thing at all in any respect.
Good things to point out ILoveyouGod
:)