You do understand that the President does not have any power to amend the U.S. Constitution by Executive Order are any other method. The President cannot even legally initiate the Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. And while Congress itself can not amend the U.S. Constitution; it only is authorized to propose an Amendment, the Amendment has to be ratified by the Legislatures of the States.
Article V
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary,
shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution,
when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
Unfortunately Executive orders have the full force of law when they are used within the scope of the Departments of the Government that Congress has vested with the authority to create and enforce regulations (law).
[FONT=&]Article I,
[/FONT]Sec. 1: All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
Sec 8 (1)The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Sec. 8 (9): To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
Sec. 8 (18) To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
Since Article I, Section 8 lays out the authority of Congress, when Congress opens the door by vesting such Department that authority, the President as the Chief Executive Officer of all those Departments grants him the authority to execute control over those Departments.
Yes, Article III, Sec 1 states, The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. I take it by SCOTUS maaking laws which are illegal and nullified you mean same-sex marriages. SCOTUS did not create marriage laws? But wasn't it Christians who demanded that the States enact the marriage laws because of their religious beliefs?
However, in such you believe that marriages are Constitutional, only if they are between members of the opposite sex?
If you do then you are actually responsible for the same-sex marriages since SCOTUS only exercised their responsibility to the People who choose to establish the religious sacrament of marriage in their prospective States since Congress is prohibited from enacting any law respecting the establishment of Religion.
Article III, Sec. (1) states; The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;... --- between Citizens of different States, —between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
Should have maybe taken the advice of Jesus before sticking marriage laws into Government since it is written instructed those who read his declaration in Luke 20; [34] And Jesus answering said unto them, The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage: [35] But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage: However, considering the passage in Matthew 23:34, I probably have already said enough on that subject.
So do you believe the State of Florida v. Zimmerman was Constitutional or did the people of Florida merely conduct a mock trial?