Federal government routinely hires internet trolls...
- Thread starter PoxEclipse
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You missed a like a couple of months ago when PoxEclipse got chased out the Simple Bible chat room here on CC--by a third-world woman less than half his age.
So I'm looking at Washington D.C. demographics and it's more 50% African-American in 2010, so that's a pretty racist comment (or didn't you know?
)
Demographics of Washington, D.C. - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So I'm looking at Washington D.C. demographics and it's more 50% African-American in 2010, so that's a pretty racist comment (or didn't you know?
)Demographics of Washington, D.C. - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A
I'm a regular poster and all the long time people here know me. So, why the false accusations and ad hominem from you? All I did was rightly state that the map you posted is based on erroneous research (it's well known) and offer a much better alternative.
The relationship between nations and IQ is a controversial area but every empirical scholarly study places Australia around 95 for average IQ.
Over 80 percent of Australia's population is of European ancestry and most of the rest are of Asian heritage with a small minority of indigenous (Aboriginal) background.t
Look at this study:
IQ and Global Inequality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Clearly the IQ of Australia averages 95 in this study which is almost exactly what it was in the other study. Starting to see a pattern here?
It is NOT 60! Australians are not the stupidest people on the face of the earth as your ignorant map falsely claims. LOL.
The relationship between nations and IQ is a controversial area but every empirical scholarly study places Australia around 95 for average IQ.
Over 80 percent of Australia's population is of European ancestry and most of the rest are of Asian heritage with a small minority of indigenous (Aboriginal) background.t
Look at this study:
IQ and Global Inequality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Clearly the IQ of Australia averages 95 in this study which is almost exactly what it was in the other study. Starting to see a pattern here?
It is NOT 60! Australians are not the stupidest people on the face of the earth as your ignorant map falsely claims. LOL.
A
I do consistently but the problem is two-fold. First, there are real conspiracies. Though far fewer in number than the enormous quantity of false conspiracies, some real ones do exist making disproving them impossible.
The second problem has to do with the conspiracy theorists themselves. They tend to be paranoid nutjobs. When you do present a careful analytical case disproving one of their many conspiracy theories, they resort to ad hominem and false assertions that you are "on the other side" or whatever idiocy comports with their paranoid delusions.
The second problem has to do with the conspiracy theorists themselves. They tend to be paranoid nutjobs. When you do present a careful analytical case disproving one of their many conspiracy theories, they resort to ad hominem and false assertions that you are "on the other side" or whatever idiocy comports with their paranoid delusions.
M
So I'm looking at Washington D.C. demographics and it's more 50% African-American in 2010, so that's a pretty racist comment (or didn't you know? )
)
See, perhaps I am not as well read as you, but in my view, there are far more true conspiracy theories than false ones. When I say true, I mean generally true, although they may have a few of the specifics wrong. (e.g. a big one being the 11 September attacks. Whether there were planes, or what type of explosives used is moot to me - the important thing is that it was an inside job, and the highest levels of visible government were complicit, whether in the operation itself, or the concealment after the fact).
I like to think of myself as at least a little paranoid, although preferably moreso, however I do resist all temptations to describe myself as a nutjob.
I also try not to resort to ad hominem attacks and false assertions, but I have to admit I don't like it when people disprove my paranoid delusions with facts and data! Note my comment of "can you prove it?" was not to you. I was just pointing out to Rachel that we can never know the effects of our actions (such as those warning of a government complicit terrorist attack at the London Olympics). Did the police presence at the local bank last night prevent a robbery? Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom, and it seems some have forgotten that price, or mock those who aren't afraid to pay it.
M
I think that man never went to the moon is a fairly obvious one. 2 years prior to the "moon landing", you have the lead astronaut of Apollo 1 sticking a lemon on the landing module for the media, and saying essentially that they're never go to make it to the moon. Then, he and his colleagues are conveniently burned to death in a fire his family claim was murder, and within 2 years, guess what? You have more agreeable astronauts landing on the moon. I can understand that. I wouldn't want to be burned to death in a fire, either. There is a lot of other evidence that the moon landing was a fraud, but I like the history as it indicates a damning agenda.
The reptillian lizards thing is more intriguing, perhaps because there is little evidence (that I have read), but seemingly more accounts (but not generally from 2 or more reliable witnesses for the 1 account). The other thing that interests me about this is that it was the serpent who tempted Eve, and I know that it is the devil (god of this world) and his minions who are the spiritual force behind those who seek to control the planet. People often mistake demons for aliens (in "alien" encounters), as that is the world-view they have been brought up in, so it wouldn't surprise me if other people similarly mistake these manifestations as reptillian, when again it is these same demons. I reserve my decision on this one.
The reptillian lizards thing is more intriguing, perhaps because there is little evidence (that I have read), but seemingly more accounts (but not generally from 2 or more reliable witnesses for the 1 account). The other thing that interests me about this is that it was the serpent who tempted Eve, and I know that it is the devil (god of this world) and his minions who are the spiritual force behind those who seek to control the planet. People often mistake demons for aliens (in "alien" encounters), as that is the world-view they have been brought up in, so it wouldn't surprise me if other people similarly mistake these manifestations as reptillian, when again it is these same demons. I reserve my decision on this one.
M
Awww, come on Age of Knowledge, couldn't you have picked a better "nut-job" poster than that for me? I thought we were friends!
I'm thinking of something definitely a lot more manly, a beard perhaps, dark sun-glasses so the CIA can't easily see who I am. Perhaps a hat, like those detectives used to wear 50 years ago, short hair (I'm old school, remember?) and also a trench coat or similar! Definitely no tattoos, girly fingernail paint, or someone with such effeminate skin and features!
I eagerly await your corrected posting!
I'm thinking of something definitely a lot more manly, a beard perhaps, dark sun-glasses so the CIA can't easily see who I am. Perhaps a hat, like those detectives used to wear 50 years ago, short hair (I'm old school, remember?) and also a trench coat or similar! Definitely no tattoos, girly fingernail paint, or someone with such effeminate skin and features!
I eagerly await your corrected posting!
As for the moon landing, it is entirely possible. - 239k miles with a Saturn V rocket and jet propulsion through zero gravity is a relative cake walk.
The only question is the Van-Allen radiation belt.
But since all the lunar astronauts are bald I think that gives evidence they actually did.
- - I mean, c'mon folks.....it's not like going to Mars.
The only question is the Van-Allen radiation belt.
But since all the lunar astronauts are bald I think that gives evidence they actually did.
- - I mean, c'mon folks.....it's not like going to Mars.
