NEW CC Perspectives on Levels of Conspiracy & Corruption in 2020 Election, CV19 & DS Existence
- Thread starter Solemateleft
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
On The Fringe: They Are Exposed Now! (Video)
Monday, August 12, 2024 2:15
They are stuck out in the open now and burning away. The bad guys are running out of places to hide.
Monday, August 12, 2024 2:15
They are stuck out in the open now and burning away. The bad guys are running out of places to hide.
JD Vance Outwits Dana Bash in Heated Interview
By David Rufful Published 5 hours ago
In a recent CNN interview, GOP vice presidential nominee JD Vance engaged in a contentious discussion with host Dana Bash about the Democratic policies of Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.
Vance criticized these policies for negatively impacting Americans, contrasting them with the achievements of former President Trump.
He defended his characterization of Walz as “weird,” citing Walz’s demeanor during his VP announcement.
“We’re running against a set of policies that I think have failed the American people,” Vance said. “President Trump delivered lower prices, lower inflation, a prosperous and peaceful world and also a secure border and Kamala Harris’s policies have produced the exact opposite.”
“So I think that what it is, is two people, Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, who aren’t comfortable in their own skin because they aren’t comfortable with their policy positions for the American people. And so their name calling, instead of actually telling the American people how they’re going to make their lives better. I think that’s weird, Dana, but look, they can call me whatever they want to,” Vance said.
The conversation escalated when Vance addressed accusations regarding Walz’s military service, asserting that Walz misrepresented his experience for political advantage.
“He’s a veteran of a war nodding along in agreement instead of saying ‘no, no, no, I did serve my country and I did it honorably, but I never went to a war zone.’ I’m not criticizing Tim Walz’s service,” Vance said. “I’m criticizing the fact that he lied about his service for political gain, Dana. Now I served in the United States Marine Corps and you know this. And look, there are a lot of things that I’m proud about.”
“He knew he was going to Iraq,” Vance added. “He decided to quit — to retire; whatever word you want to use … because he wanted to run for Congress. He lied about that. He said that when he decided to retire, he did not know he was going to Iraq. That is another untruth, as even his senior military officer said.”
Vance emphasized the importance of honesty in political discourse, particularly in relation to Harris’s judgment.
“The truth is that Tim Walz didn’t tell the truth, and importantly, Dana, this is about Kamala Harris’ judgment.”
In a recent CNN interview, GOP vice presidential nominee JD Vance engaged in a contentious discussion with host Dana Bash about the Democratic policies of Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.
Vance criticized these policies for negatively impacting Americans, contrasting them with the achievements of former President Trump.
He defended his characterization of Walz as “weird,” citing Walz’s demeanor during his VP announcement.
“We’re running against a set of policies that I think have failed the American people,” Vance said. “President Trump delivered lower prices, lower inflation, a prosperous and peaceful world and also a secure border and Kamala Harris’s policies have produced the exact opposite.”
“So I think that what it is, is two people, Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, who aren’t comfortable in their own skin because they aren’t comfortable with their policy positions for the American people. And so their name calling, instead of actually telling the American people how they’re going to make their lives better. I think that’s weird, Dana, but look, they can call me whatever they want to,” Vance said.
The conversation escalated when Vance addressed accusations regarding Walz’s military service, asserting that Walz misrepresented his experience for political advantage.
“He’s a veteran of a war nodding along in agreement instead of saying ‘no, no, no, I did serve my country and I did it honorably, but I never went to a war zone.’ I’m not criticizing Tim Walz’s service,” Vance said. “I’m criticizing the fact that he lied about his service for political gain, Dana. Now I served in the United States Marine Corps and you know this. And look, there are a lot of things that I’m proud about.”
“He knew he was going to Iraq,” Vance added. “He decided to quit — to retire; whatever word you want to use … because he wanted to run for Congress. He lied about that. He said that when he decided to retire, he did not know he was going to Iraq. That is another untruth, as even his senior military officer said.”
Vance emphasized the importance of honesty in political discourse, particularly in relation to Harris’s judgment.
“The truth is that Tim Walz didn’t tell the truth, and importantly, Dana, this is about Kamala Harris’ judgment.”
Breaking: California Senator Flees Democrat Party, Heads To GOP
State Senator Marie Alvarado-Gil has switched her party affiliation from Democrat to Republican, citing concerns about the dominance of the Democratic supermajority and its disconnect from the values of her constituents in California.
In a statement, she expressed frustration with the party’s shift towards the left, criticizing its handling of issues such as crime, homelessness, and education.
Alvarado-Gil, who represents a predominantly Republican district, emphasized her commitment to the needs of her constituents over party ideology.
“Since my first day in office, I have put the interests of my constituents first. I was elected to serve the public, not a political ideology,” Alvarado-Gil stated. “The status quo under a supermajority Democratic rule in the legislature is simply not working for this state. It is after deep reflection I announce that I will be joining the Senate Republican Caucus and the California Republican Party in their fight to fix California.”
“The Democratic Party of today is not the Democratic Party that I signed up with as a new voter,” she said. “It has changed. The pendulum has swung so far to the left that it has disengaged from what true Californians value—our middle-class values, our families, our diversity in California. And frankly, I just could not support an ideology over the will of the people.”
“We have succumbed to a public education system where it is okay where kids don’t read and write by third grade,” she said.
“I’ve been listening to them for the past two years, serving my district that is predominantly a Republican district. I’ve been serving as a representative of the values of our district and a representative of what means the most to our constituents, whether they’re Democrats, Republicans, or no party preference,” she added. “If we know it’s a problem and the supermajority has the ability to impact change, why not do that for the good of Californians?”
Her decision has sparked mixed reactions, with some viewing it as a betrayal while others see it as aligning with her district’s values.
This switch adds a ninth Republican to the California Senate, although Democrats still hold a supermajority in the chamber.
State Senator Marie Alvarado-Gil has switched her party affiliation from Democrat to Republican, citing concerns about the dominance of the Democratic supermajority and its disconnect from the values of her constituents in California.
In a statement, she expressed frustration with the party’s shift towards the left, criticizing its handling of issues such as crime, homelessness, and education.
Alvarado-Gil, who represents a predominantly Republican district, emphasized her commitment to the needs of her constituents over party ideology.
“Since my first day in office, I have put the interests of my constituents first. I was elected to serve the public, not a political ideology,” Alvarado-Gil stated. “The status quo under a supermajority Democratic rule in the legislature is simply not working for this state. It is after deep reflection I announce that I will be joining the Senate Republican Caucus and the California Republican Party in their fight to fix California.”
“The Democratic Party of today is not the Democratic Party that I signed up with as a new voter,” she said. “It has changed. The pendulum has swung so far to the left that it has disengaged from what true Californians value—our middle-class values, our families, our diversity in California. And frankly, I just could not support an ideology over the will of the people.”
“We have succumbed to a public education system where it is okay where kids don’t read and write by third grade,” she said.
“I’ve been listening to them for the past two years, serving my district that is predominantly a Republican district. I’ve been serving as a representative of the values of our district and a representative of what means the most to our constituents, whether they’re Democrats, Republicans, or no party preference,” she added. “If we know it’s a problem and the supermajority has the ability to impact change, why not do that for the good of Californians?”
Her decision has sparked mixed reactions, with some viewing it as a betrayal while others see it as aligning with her district’s values.
This switch adds a ninth Republican to the California Senate, although Democrats still hold a supermajority in the chamber.
LOL, they still think we're stupid... hahaha
Olympics Pres: We Would Screen Out Men if Science Could Tell Men and Women Apart
International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach was confronted by a reporter over the recent controversy of biological males allegedly dominating the Olympics by facing women.
The two boxers in the women’s division, Algeria’s Imane Khelif and Taiwan’s Lin Yu-ting, failed a chromosome tests, but were allowed to participate.
However, President Bach claims the Olympics doesn’t have a way to identify the difference between men and women.
“If somebody is presenting us a scientifically solid system how to identify men and women, we’re the first ones to do it,” he said. “We do not like this uncertainty.”
By failing the chromosome tests, it suggests that Khelif and Yu-ting should have been disqualified.
Some media outlets have claimed Khelif suffers from a rare medical condition known as “Differences of Sex Development.”
The Cleveland Clinic defines DSD as “conditions where a person’s reproductive organs and genitals are ‘mismatched’ at birth. Examples include male chromosomes (XY) and genitalia that appears female (vulva) or female chromosomes (XX) and genitalia that appears male (penis). Some people with DSDs have characteristics of both sexes.”
The International Olympic Committee has faced serious backlash after Khelif and Lin were allowed to repeatedly punch women and dominate the Olympics.
One reporter asked whether the Olympics would be introducing such a test that proves the sex of the athletes.
Bach claims that that no such test exists.
Olympics Pres: We Would Screen Out Men if Science Could Tell Men and Women Apart
International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach was confronted by a reporter over the recent controversy of biological males allegedly dominating the Olympics by facing women.
The two boxers in the women’s division, Algeria’s Imane Khelif and Taiwan’s Lin Yu-ting, failed a chromosome tests, but were allowed to participate.
However, President Bach claims the Olympics doesn’t have a way to identify the difference between men and women.
“If somebody is presenting us a scientifically solid system how to identify men and women, we’re the first ones to do it,” he said. “We do not like this uncertainty.”
By failing the chromosome tests, it suggests that Khelif and Yu-ting should have been disqualified.
Some media outlets have claimed Khelif suffers from a rare medical condition known as “Differences of Sex Development.”
The Cleveland Clinic defines DSD as “conditions where a person’s reproductive organs and genitals are ‘mismatched’ at birth. Examples include male chromosomes (XY) and genitalia that appears female (vulva) or female chromosomes (XX) and genitalia that appears male (penis). Some people with DSDs have characteristics of both sexes.”
The International Olympic Committee has faced serious backlash after Khelif and Lin were allowed to repeatedly punch women and dominate the Olympics.
One reporter asked whether the Olympics would be introducing such a test that proves the sex of the athletes.
Bach claims that that no such test exists.
Joe Biden Finally Admits How He Got Pushed Out
During an appearance on CBS, 81-year-old Joe Biden finally came clean about why he abruptly dropped out of the 2024 presidential race.
Biden admits that he was forced out by key Democrat figures.
“Look, the polls we had showed that it was a neck and neck race. Would have been down to the wire,” Biden said. “But what happened was a number of my Democratic colleagues in the House and Senate thought that I was going to hurt them in the races.”
“And I was concerned if I stayed in the race, that would be the topic you’d be interviewing me about. Why did Nancy Pelosi say? Why did someone… and I thought it’d be a real distraction.”
In July, a source told Politico: “Nancy made clear that they could do this the easy way or the hard way. She gave them three weeks of the easy way. It was about to be the hard way.”
“We were giving him the respect of the weekend to make his decision. We were hopeful that this is the decision we would make,” the source said.
In a series of crucial meetings spread over three days, Biden held private discussions with top Democratic leaders, including Pelosi, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY). Schumer even made a discreet visit to Biden’s beach vacation home in Delaware.
The move to step down was reportedly influenced by Democratic heavyweights such as Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Hakeem Jeffries, all of whom were allegedly worried about the repercussions of Biden’s candidacy on their own electoral prospects. The internal push came in the wake of Biden’s contentious debate performance against former President Donald Trump in late June, which many saw as detrimental to his campaign.
Biden faced significant dissent within the Democratic Party, leading to his decision to withdraw from the presidential race.
Following his exit, he endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris, who has since gained ground against former President Donald Trump.
This development highlights concerns about Biden’s campaign viability, which were also echoed by former President Barack Obama.
Democratic operatives were discussing contingency plans, yet Biden’s abrupt withdrawal surprised even his close advisors.
Shortly after, Nancy Pelosi officially endorsed Harris as the party’s next leader, signaling a shift in the party’s direction amid preparations for a competitive election.
During an appearance on CBS, 81-year-old Joe Biden finally came clean about why he abruptly dropped out of the 2024 presidential race.
Biden admits that he was forced out by key Democrat figures.
“Look, the polls we had showed that it was a neck and neck race. Would have been down to the wire,” Biden said. “But what happened was a number of my Democratic colleagues in the House and Senate thought that I was going to hurt them in the races.”
“And I was concerned if I stayed in the race, that would be the topic you’d be interviewing me about. Why did Nancy Pelosi say? Why did someone… and I thought it’d be a real distraction.”
In July, a source told Politico: “Nancy made clear that they could do this the easy way or the hard way. She gave them three weeks of the easy way. It was about to be the hard way.”
“We were giving him the respect of the weekend to make his decision. We were hopeful that this is the decision we would make,” the source said.
In a series of crucial meetings spread over three days, Biden held private discussions with top Democratic leaders, including Pelosi, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY). Schumer even made a discreet visit to Biden’s beach vacation home in Delaware.
The move to step down was reportedly influenced by Democratic heavyweights such as Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Hakeem Jeffries, all of whom were allegedly worried about the repercussions of Biden’s candidacy on their own electoral prospects. The internal push came in the wake of Biden’s contentious debate performance against former President Donald Trump in late June, which many saw as detrimental to his campaign.
Biden faced significant dissent within the Democratic Party, leading to his decision to withdraw from the presidential race.
Following his exit, he endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris, who has since gained ground against former President Donald Trump.
This development highlights concerns about Biden’s campaign viability, which were also echoed by former President Barack Obama.
Democratic operatives were discussing contingency plans, yet Biden’s abrupt withdrawal surprised even his close advisors.
Shortly after, Nancy Pelosi officially endorsed Harris as the party’s next leader, signaling a shift in the party’s direction amid preparations for a competitive election.
Woman Fired for Refusing Mandated Vaccine Wins $687K
A Tennessee woman, Tanja Benton, has won a nearly $700,000 settlement after being fired for refusing the mandated COVID-19 vaccine by her employer, BlueCross BlueShield.
The federal jury ruled in her favor, citing her sincerely held religious belief against the vaccine’s origins in aborted fetal cell lines.
Benton, a biostatistical research scientist, worked remotely without performance issues but was terminated after requesting a religious exemption.
“As part of its verdict, the federal jury awarded Benton $177,240 in back pay, $10,000 in compensatory damages, and $500,000 in punitive damages, for a total of $687,240,” one report noted.
“A group of employees terminated by BCBST over a Title VII violation regarding religious discrimination are also currently in a class action suit against the employer,” another report stated.
“The mass layoffs came weeks ahead of a Tennessee law that would prevent the company from carrying out the mandate,” it added.
“These are my friends. These are family members. These people will not have the money to take care of their families, and so, the only thing I know to do is to act. We’re doing more than just rallying; we are calling in our elected officials,” Tennessee Neighbors for Liberty director Glenda Pappu said.
Additionally, other employees terminated over the vaccine mandate are engaged in a class-action lawsuit against the company.
A Tennessee woman, Tanja Benton, has won a nearly $700,000 settlement after being fired for refusing the mandated COVID-19 vaccine by her employer, BlueCross BlueShield.
The federal jury ruled in her favor, citing her sincerely held religious belief against the vaccine’s origins in aborted fetal cell lines.
Benton, a biostatistical research scientist, worked remotely without performance issues but was terminated after requesting a religious exemption.
“As part of its verdict, the federal jury awarded Benton $177,240 in back pay, $10,000 in compensatory damages, and $500,000 in punitive damages, for a total of $687,240,” one report noted.
“A group of employees terminated by BCBST over a Title VII violation regarding religious discrimination are also currently in a class action suit against the employer,” another report stated.
“The mass layoffs came weeks ahead of a Tennessee law that would prevent the company from carrying out the mandate,” it added.
“These are my friends. These are family members. These people will not have the money to take care of their families, and so, the only thing I know to do is to act. We’re doing more than just rallying; we are calling in our elected officials,” Tennessee Neighbors for Liberty director Glenda Pappu said.
Additionally, other employees terminated over the vaccine mandate are engaged in a class-action lawsuit against the company.
-
1
- Show all
Live: Musk Interviews Trump on X - Watch Party
Monday, August 12, 2024 20:25
STARTS AT 7:50PM ET: Join me live for a watch party of Elon Musk interviewing Donald Trump on X.
Monday, August 12, 2024 20:25
STARTS AT 7:50PM ET: Join me live for a watch party of Elon Musk interviewing Donald Trump on X.
Incase you missed this BIG NEWS from YESTERDAY!!!
On the Fringe: Tonight Will Break the Internet (Video)
Tuesday, August 13, 2024 1:34
President Trump’s Interview with Elon Musk on X
Tuesday, August 13, 2024 7:28
On the Fringe: Tonight Will Break the Internet (Video)
Tuesday, August 13, 2024 1:34
President Trump’s Interview with Elon Musk on X
Tuesday, August 13, 2024 7:28
We received internal Trump documents from ‘Robert.’ Then the campaign confirmed it was hacked.
The campaign suggested Iran was to blame. POLITICO has not independently verified the identity of the hacker or their motivation.
The campaign suggested Iran was to blame. POLITICO has not independently verified the identity of the hacker or their motivation.
Shhhh, .... When your significant other whispers in your ear and makes the hair stand up on your arms...
Essentially AWAKENING your senses!!!
In the spiritual context, the phenomenon of hair standing up on one’s arm holds a profound meaning. This occurrence, known as ‘piloerection’, is a physical reaction that all mammals share.
Interestingly, this physiological response occurs in response to intense emotions or spiritual experiences. In such cases, the standing up of hair on one’s arm is seen as a sign of heightened spiritual sensitivity or awakening. It is believed that when one’s spiritual senses are awakened, the body responds in unique ways, one of which is the hair standing up on the arms.
Essentially AWAKENING your senses!!!
In the spiritual context, the phenomenon of hair standing up on one’s arm holds a profound meaning. This occurrence, known as ‘piloerection’, is a physical reaction that all mammals share.
Interestingly, this physiological response occurs in response to intense emotions or spiritual experiences. In such cases, the standing up of hair on one’s arm is seen as a sign of heightened spiritual sensitivity or awakening. It is believed that when one’s spiritual senses are awakened, the body responds in unique ways, one of which is the hair standing up on the arms.
New X22 Report: [KH] Next, Do You Attack The King At The Beginning Or End Of The Game?Timing Is Everything
Tuesday, August 13, 2024 18:31
.jpg)
The [DS] is ready to make their next move. They have moved [KH] into position but soon she will be removed from the board. The next player will most likely be [BO] or [MO]. Trump has now returned to X, timing is everything. We are now entering the 4th quarter and all roads lead to Obama. It’s going to get bumpy so faster your seat belts.
Tuesday, August 13, 2024 18:31
The [DS] is ready to make their next move. They have moved [KH] into position but soon she will be removed from the board. The next player will most likely be [BO] or [MO]. Trump has now returned to X, timing is everything. We are now entering the 4th quarter and all roads lead to Obama. It’s going to get bumpy so faster your seat belts.
Despite being pagan garbage, the ancient Greek Olympics at least made some kind of sense. I'd certainly never recommend nude sports: but it really goes to show how seriously they regarded gender distinction. I can only imagine what somebody like Xenophon or Alexander would say about the modern Olympics. They would probably just laugh.